Table of Contents


SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant ý
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
ýPreliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
¨Definitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material  under §240.14a-12
ýPreliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
¨Definitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
ýNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1)Amount Previously Paid:
2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3)Filing Party:
4)Date Filed:

ýNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1)Amount Previously Paid:
2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3)Filing Party:
4)Date Filed:



logoa071.jpg

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To be held on Wednesday, May 18, 201619, 2021
10:00 a.m. Pacific Time
TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS:

The 20162021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders ("Annual Meeting") of Align Technology, Inc. (“Align”("Align" or the "Company") will be heldwebcast virtually on Wednesday, May 18, 2016,19, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time at Align’s corporate headquarters located at 2560 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131.Time. You may begin accessing the webcast using your personalized link in your confirmation email received after registration.
Details regarding admission to the meeting and the business to be conducted are more fully described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.
We are once again pleased to take advantage of the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC rule allowing companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders over the Internet. We believe that this e-proxy process expedites stockholders' receipt of proxy materials, while lowering the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials and reducing the environmental impact of our annual meeting.Annual Meeting. On or about April [___][●], 2016, we mailed to our beneficial and registered stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") containing instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and Annual Report and how to vote online. All other stockholders will continue toThe Notice also contains instructions on how you can request and receive a printed paper copy of the Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report by mail. The Notice also contains instructions on how you can (i) receive a paper copy of the Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report if you only received a Notice by mail or (ii) elect to receive your Proxy Statement and Annual Report over the Internet if you received them by mail this year.   Report.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope that you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote via the Internet or by telephone, or, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card. Voting over the Internet or by telephone or by written proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting regardless of whether you attend in person.
Thank you for your ongoing support of, and continued interest in, Align Technology, Inc.


Sincerely,

ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
signatureofjuliecoletti1.jpg
Roger E. GeorgeJulie Coletti
Senior Vice President, CorporateChief Legal and Legal Affairs, General
Counsel and Corporate SecretaryRegulatory Officer







TABLE OF CONTENTSPage


-i-


ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
2560 Orchard Parkway410 N. Scottsdale Rd. Suite 1300
San Jose, California 95131

Tempe, AZ 85281

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

VIRTUAL MEETING LOGISTICS
image81.jpg


ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Time and Date110:00 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on Wednesday, May 18, 2016
PlaceCorporate Headquarters, 2560 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131
Items of Business
1.
To elect the eight (8)ten (10) directors named in this proxy statement
2.
2To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016
3.
2021
3To ratify an amendment of our bylaws to designate Delaware and the District Courts of the United States as the exclusive forums for adjudication of certain disputes
4To approve the amendment and restatement of our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
5To conduct an advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation
4.
To amend Article V of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the “for cause” requirement for stockholder removal of a director
5.
To amend Article V of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority vote requirement for stockholder removal of a director
6.
To approve our amended and restated 2005 Incentive Plan
7.
6To consider such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof

Adjournments and PostponementsAny action on the items of business described above may be considered at the annual meeting at the time and on the date specified above or at any time and date to which the annual meeting may be properly adjourned or postponed.
Record DateOnly stockholders who owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on March 24, 2016 are entitled to vote.
Meeting AdmissionAll stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. Registration will begin at 9:30 a.m. If you attend, please know that you may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Stockholders holding stock in brokerage accounts (“street name” holders) will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting. 
Voting
Your vote is very important. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote your shares over the Internet or by telephone. If you received a paper copy of a proxy card by mail, you may submit your proxy for the annual meeting by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the pre-addressed envelope provided. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the section entitled General Information - How do I vote?  in the proxy statement.

IMPORTANT MEETING INFORMATION

Technical Issues
Contact 866-612-8937 (toll-free) or 973-873-7684 (international) for any technical difficulties or trouble accessing the virtual meeting, or if you are unable to locate your digital control number.

Adjournments and Postponements
Any action on the items of business described above may be considered at the annual meeting at the time and on the date specified above or at any time and date to which the annual meeting may be properly adjourned or postponed.

Meeting Admission
All stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. Online access will begin at 9:30 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time, and we encourage you to access the Annual Meeting early. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting, stockholders as of the Record Date must register in advance at http://viewproxy.com/aligntech/2021/htype.asp.

Voting
Your vote is very important. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote your shares over the Internet or by telephone. If you received a paper copy of a proxy card by mail, you may submit your proxy for the Annual Meeting by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the pre-addressed envelope provided. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the section entitled Voting Information - How do I vote my shares during the Annual Meeting? in the proxy statement.
This noticeNotice of annual meetingAnnual Meeting and proxy statementProxy Statement and form of proxy are being distributed and made available on the Internet on or about April [___], 2016.[●].

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 18, 2016.19, 2021. The proxy statementProxy Statement and Align Technology, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K are available electronically at http://www.viewproxy.com/aligntech/2016.2021


i




-ii-


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information contained in this Proxy Statement.proxy statement. It does not contain all the information you should consider and as such we urge you to carefully read the Proxy Statementproxy statement in its entirety prior to voting. For additional information, please review the Company’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2020.
MEETING AGENDA AND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS
ItemVoting StandardVote RecommendationPage Reference
1Annual Election of DirectorsMajority of votes castFOR each nominee
2Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmMajority of votes castFOR
3Ratify an Amendment of our Bylaws to designate Delaware and the District Courts of the United States as the Exclusive Forums for adjudication of certain disputes66 2/3% of the Outstanding SharesFOR
4Approval of Amendment and Restatement of our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase PlanMajority of votes castFOR
5Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer CompensationMajority of votes castFOR
ItemVoting StandardVote RecommendationPage Reference
1 -Annual Election of DirectorsMajority of votes castFOR each nominee6
2 -Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmMajority of votes castFOR18
3 -Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer CompensationMajority of votes castFOR21
4 -Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the "for cause" requirement for stockholder removal of a director66 2/3 of outstanding voting stockFOR23
5 -Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority vote requirement for stockholder removal of a director66 2/3 of outstanding voting stockFOR25
6 -Amendment and Restatement of 2005 Incentive PlanMajority of votes castFOR27


DIRECTOR NOMINEES
You are being asked to vote on the election of these 8ten directors. Each member of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors ("Board") is elected annually by majority voting. All directors other than Mr. Prescott and Mr. Hogan are considered by our Board to be independent.
    Committee Memberships*
NameAgeDirector SincePrimary OccupationIndependent?ACCCNCGCTC
Joseph M. Hogan582015President & CEO, Align Technology, Inc.No    
Joseph Lacob601997Managing Partner & CEO of The Golden State WarriorsYes  CX
C. Raymond Larkin (1)672004Principal of Group Outcome LLCYes  X 
George J. Morrow642006Retired, EVP of Worldwide Sales & Marketing, Amgen, Inc.Yes C  
Thomas M. Prescott602002Retired President & CEO, Align Technology, Inc.No   X
Andrea L. Saia582013Retired, Global Head of Vision Care, Novartis AGYesX
X(2)
 
X(2)
Greg J. Santora642004Retired, CFO, Shopping.comYesCX  
Warren S. Thaler532004President, Gund Investment CorporationYesX XX
Mr. Thomas M. Prescott, our former President and Chief Executive Officer who currently continues to serve as a director, was not nominated to stand for re-election and will be retiring from the Board at the Annual Meeting. As a result, the Board has resolved to reduce the size of the Board from 11 to 10 directors at the end of Mr. Prescott's term.
(1)Mr. Larkin is Chairman of the Board of Directors
(2)Ms. Saia's tenure as a member of the Compensation Committee and Technology Committee will commence immediately following the Annual Meeting subject to her continued membership on the Board.
Committee Memberships*
NameAgeDirector SincePrimary OccupationIndependent?ACCCNGCTC
Joseph M. Hogan632015President & CEO, Align Technology, Inc.No
Kevin J. Dallas572018CEO, Wind River SystemsYesX
Joseph Lacob651997CEO & Governor of The Golden State WarriorsYesCX
C. Raymond Larkin, Jr. (1)
722004Retired, Principal of Group Outcome LLCYesX
George J. Morrow692006Retired, EVP of Worldwide Sales & Marketing, Amgen, Inc.YesCX
Anne M. Myong532019Former CEO & CFO of Aura Financial CorporationYesXX
Andrea L. Saia632013Retired, Global Head of Vision Care, Novartis AGYesXXX
Greg J. Santora692003Retired, CFO, Shopping.comYesCX
Susan E. Siegel602017Former Chief Innovation Officer at General Electric and Former CEO of GE Business InnovationsYesXX
Warren S. Thaler582004Consultant, Gund Investment CorporationYesXXX

(1)Mr. Larkin is Chairman of the Board
*AC = Audit; CC = Compensation; NCCGNGC = Nominating and Corporate Governance; TC= Technology; X = Member; C = Chair



-iii-ii

Align Technology, Inc. ("We", "Our", "Align") is a global medical device company engaged in the design, manufacture and marketing of ContentsInvisalign® clear aligners and iTero® intraoral scanners and services for dentistry, and exocad® computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing ("CAD/CAM") software for dental laboratories and dental practitioners. Our products are intended primarily for the treatment of malocclusion or the misalignment of teeth and are designed to help dental professionals achieve the clinical outcomes that they expect and the results patients desire.
Our purpose is to transform smiles and change lives, and we are accomplishing this goal by establishing clear aligners as the principal solution for the treatment of malocclusions and our Invisalign clear aligners as the treatment solution of choice by orthodontists, general dental practitioners and patients globally. To date, over 9.6 million people worldwide have been treated with our Invisalign System.
COVID-19 BUSINESS IMPACTS
In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted our business and the businesses and lives of our customers, their patients and our suppliers in unprecedented ways; requiring us to reevaluate priorities, adapt to new ways of doing business and developing new strategies and plans quickly and revising them frequently as conditions evolved. By the end of 2020, many dental practices had resumed operations although often at capacities less than pre-pandemic levels. Additionally, in virtually all practices the effects of COVID-19 persist, typically in the form of additional preventative safety measures such as added sterilization requirements, increased costs for personal protective equipment and staggered patient visits intended to reduce the risks of cross contamination, each of which contribute to fewer patient visits per day.

Throughout the pandemic, our focus has remained steadfast on the health and safety of our employees, our customers and their patients, operational execution, and continued progress toward our four principal pillars of growth: (i) International expansion; (ii) GP adoption; (iii) Patient demand & conversion; and (iv) Orthodontic utilization.

To help customers through the pandemic and to stimulate demand for our products and services during the recovery, we modified existing programs and implemented new promotions in 2020, some of which remain in effect. For instance, we did not implement annual price increases on our various clear aligner products in 2020, offered promotions to encourage customers with patients in wires and brackets to switch to our Invisalign clear aligners, allowed customers to maintain their promotional status levels notwithstanding declining purchases, increased advertising and launched new media campaigns, generally released virtual solutions, expanded training programs, including online training, all in an effort to help our customers and accelerate our mutual return to normal operations

While we did not meet the original annual performance goals set at the beginning of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our second half recovery was directly attributable to our senior management's crisis management and their dedication to strong operational execution. Our fiscal 2020 financial and strategic highlights and their impact on executive compensation are summarized below.
FISCAL 2020 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Align set new financial records in the second half of2020, to end the year strong after a significant COVID-19 pandemic-related shortfall in the second quarter. Net revenues of $734.1 million and $834.5 million, in the third and fourth quarters of 2020, respectively, were both new quarterly records helping us rebound from a second quarter year-over-year decline of 41.3% to end the year at $2.5 billion in net revenues, up 2.7% compared to 2019. During the year, we served our 9 millionth Invisalign clear aligner patient and shipped 1.6 million Invisalign clear aligner cases, increasing worldwide Invisalign clear aligner volume by 7.9% compared to the prior year. In the fourth quarter alone, we shipped Invisalign clear aligners to a record 77 thousand doctors globally, 7,300 of which were first time customers and we trained 6,400 new doctors on the use of our products. Invisalign case submissions from iTero and other digital scanners increased to 84.0% in the Americas and 73.7% internationally by the fourth quarter of 2020, up from 79.5% and 64.7% in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Operating income in the third and fourth quarters of 2020 was $177.1 million and $213.2 million, respectively, compared to $127.2 million and $151.2 million in the comparable quarters in 2019. For the year, operating income of $387.2 million was down compared to $542.5 million in 2019, primarily as a result of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related business disruptions in the second quarter of 2020.
iii


CORPORATE

image101.jpg

2020 Business Highlights

In addition to those highlights already mentioned, Align's other key announcements in 2020 include:

exocad Acquisition. The $420.8 million second quarter cash acquisition of exocad Global Holdings GmbH, a German dental CAD/CAM software company that offers fully integrated workflows to dental labs and practices with expertise in restorative dentistry, implantology, guided surgery, and smile design to strengthen our digital platform and extend our digital dental solutions towards fully interdisciplinary end-to-end workflows
Virtual Solutions. The launch of Invisalign Virtual Appointment and Invisalign Virtual Care, two continuity of care virtual solutions that offer practice and care transformation to doctors by enabling a range of remote practice services for their patients such as video appointments and care and treatment progress reviews and communications
Software Launches. The launch of ClinCheck 6.0 Pro Software, the latest release of our proprietary 3D treatment planning software showing the planned tooth movements throughout a patient's Invisalign treatment, making it more broadly available to doctors on multiple devices at any time via the cloud. ClinCheck Pro 6.0 software also includes the ClinCheck "In-Face" Visualization tool, enhancing the digital treatment planning experience for doctors and their patients
Clear Aligner Innovations. The introduction of Invisalign G8 with SmartForce Aligner Activation; a clear aligner biomechanical innovation that allows doctors to more predictably treat crowding, crossbite and deep bite cases
Advanced Scanning Technologies. U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance of the iTero Element 5D Imaging System, the first integrated dental imaging system that simultaneously records 3D, intraoral color and near-infrared ("NIRI") imaging and enables comparison over time using the iTero TimeLapse technology. NIRI technology aids in detection and monitoring of interproximal caries lesions above the gingiva without using harmful radiation and provides a new comprehensive approach to clinical applications, workflows and user experience

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
We recognize the importance of corporate governance as a component of providing long-term stockholder value. Since the last Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we have continued to Our Board is responsible for ensuring our governance practices are well-designed and appropriate for our business. We continually
iv


review and update our corporate governance practices to ensure that our policies are aligned with stockholder interests and corporate governance best practices.
INDEPENDENCEIndependenceRecent Change?BEST PRACTICESRecent Change?Best Practices
69 of 810 director nominees are independentDouble-triggerDouble trigger for all cash compensation arrangements in the event of a change of control for all executives, including our CEOþmembers of senior management
Independent Chairman of the Board has strong role with significant governance responsibilitiesStock
Significant stock ownership requirements forreviewed annually:

CEO - 6x his annual base salary
Other senior management - 3x their annual base salaries
Non-employee directors - $400,000
Separate CEO and executives that are reviewed annuallyChairman of the Board rolesIndependent directors meet regularly without management present
The Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees are each wholly comprised wholly of independent directorsThe Board amended ourOur Insider Trading Policy to prohibit officers,prohibits all employees and directors and employees from engaging in short-selling, hedging transactions or pledging Align'sour securities as collateral for loans
þ
Independent directors meet regularly in executive session without management presentAccountability and DiversityThe Board determined to eliminate our Stockholder Rights Plan ("Poison Pill") by not renewing it when it expired in November 2015þ
ACCOUNTABILITYRISK OVERSIGHTRisk Oversight
Annual election of all directorsBoard oversight of our overall risk management infrastructure
Majority voting in uncontested electionsCommittee oversight of certain risks related to each committee's area of responsibility
Annual performance self-evaluations by the Board and committeesThe Board, each of its committees and management actively promote a culture to manage risks as part of our corporate strategy and day-to-day operations
If approved by the requisite voteOur directors offer a diversity of stockholders, theviewpoints, backgrounds, national origins, and experiences. Currently, three of our 10 director nominees are womenDedicated Chief Information Security, Data Privacy and Global Compliance and Ethics Officers responsible for enterprise-wide information security strategy, data privacy, and compliance and ethics policies, standards, processes, technologies and their effectiveness
Our Board approved an amendmenthas delegated oversight responsibility to our AmendedNominating and Restated CertificateGovernance Committee over our environmental, social and governance (ESG) efforts, including those related to corporate social responsibility and our related disclosure effortsWe created a Corporate Social Responsibility ("CSR") organization, appointed a full-time dedicated Senior Director of IncorporationCSR (later promoted to eliminateVice President), established a CSR Committee, and established the requirement that directors can only be removed "for cause"pillars of our comprehensive CSR program philosophy

þ
If approved by the requisite vote of stockholders, the Board approved an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirement to remove a directorþ


-iv-


FISCAL 2015 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Fiscal 2015 was a year of continued solid performance for Align, set forth below are a few highlights.
Strong Revenue Growth

2015 revenues were $845.5 million, an 11% increase from 2014. This revenue growth reflects growth across all customer channels and geographies, as well as the expansion of our customer base and increased utilization by existing doctors.

Record Invisalign Shipments and Strong Growth Trend

In 2015, we shipped a record 583.2 thousand Invisalign cases, an increase of 22% compared to 2014. This reflects 32.5% volume growth from our International doctors and 17.7% volume growth from our North American doctors. These growth rates are due to continued adoption and utilization from international doctors and a solid rebound in North America, both driven by investments in territory coverage and sales and marketing programs. Product and technology innovation is also a key growth driver, and as a result, in 2015 we continued to see increased clinical confidence in Invisalign treatment for our customers worldwide.


-v-


Operating Margin
Full year operating income of $188.6 million, or 22.3% of revenue, includes 1.6 points of impact from the Additional Aligner policy we adopted in July 2015 and foreign exchange rates on a constant currency basis. Effective July 18, 2015, we no longer distinguish between mid-course corrections and case refinements providing doctors the ability to order additional aligners to address either treatment need at no charge, subject to certain requirements. While the policy change was largely immaterial to our cash flows, it did impact the timing at which we recognize revenue. We estimate that 2015 reported revenues and pre tax income were lower by approximately $14 million due to this change.

* Operating Margin for 2013 is Non-GAAP. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP can be found in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

Stock Repurchased in 2015
We generated $238.0 million of cash flow from operations in 2015 from which we repurchased 1.7 million shares, returning approximately $102 million to our stockholders. This reduced our average diluted shares outstanding by 1.0%, which approximated our 2015 annual net burn rate of 1.27%.


-vi-


FISCAL 20152020 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

CEO Succession

On March 26, 2015, we announced that, effective June 1, 2015, Thomas M. Prescott would retire as PresidentOur 2020 senior management compensation program was designed to build upon our outstanding 2019 business and Chief Executive Officer,financial performance. We continued the practice of directly tying a substantial portion of the targeted direct compensation of our members of senior management to variable compensation with 92% and that Joseph M. Hogan would become our new President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board conducted an exhaustive and thoughtful search, looking both externally and internally to identify84% of the best possible individual to lead Align into its next chapter of innovation and growth. With the appointment of Mr. Hogan, the Board believes it fulfilled its goal, selecting the best candidate to bring Align continued success.

Pay for performance

Over 65% of annual target compensation for our CEO and all of our other named executive officers is paid through equity, providing("NEOs"), respectively, being variable. Base salary remained the only fixed direct alignment with returnscompensation component, as outlined in the following table.

COVID-19 Impact

Due to stockholdersthe uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and incentivesthe impact it was having (and was expected to drive long-term business success. The compensation package for our new CEO is designed to motivate him to successfully implementcontinue having) on our business strategyperformance, including lower than expected sales of our Invisalign clear aligners and create sustainable long-term value for stockholders by providingiTero intraoral scanners, our Compensation Committee performed a mid-year review and reassessment of our 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan ("Bonus Plan") performance goals to determine whether the opportunityoriginal metrics and performance goals continued to build significant ownershipappropriately incentivize employees. After its review, the Compensation Committee chose to retain the overall program, reset the original annual performance targets under the Bonus Plan and share in these gains if our stock increases on an absolute basis (RSUs) and if we perform well relativereduce the maximum amount payable to members of senior management. For further details, please see the Nasdaq Composite (MSUs) on total stockholder returns over a three-year performance period.

The tablediscussion below highlights the 2015 compensation for our current CEO, Joe Hogan (at target and not adjusting downwards based on the number of months Mr. Hogan was employed by Align), and the average named executive officer (excluding the CEO). It also shows the delivery of cash versus equity and the significant portion of compensation that is performance-based. See further explanation in the under "Executive Summary Summary" of the Compensation Discussion & Analysis starting on page 3728 of the Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION ELEMENT:DESCRIPTION:
SalaryAnnual base pay
Actual Cash Incentive (bonus)Cash-based Incentive Compensation; annual performance-based bonus
Restricted Stock UnitsOther equity whose value increases with stock price
Market Stock UnitsPerformance-based equity using 3-year relative stock price
Other CompensationIncludes limited perquisites and other personal benefits


-vii-


ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
2560 Orchard Parkway
San Jose, California 95131
_______________________________ 
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE
2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
__________________________________ 
GENERAL INFORMATION

Q:Why am I receiving these materials?
A:Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is providing these materials to you in connection with its solicitation of proxies for use at Align’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. local time, at our corporate headquarters located at 2560 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131 (referred to in this proxy statement as the “Annual Meeting”). As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the items of business described in this proxy statement.

Q:What information is contained in these materials?
A:
The proxy materials include our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting and our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. If you received a paper copy of these materials by mail, the proxy materials also include a proxy card for the Annual Meeting. If you received a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials, see "How do I vote?" below. The information in this proxy statement contains important information regarding our Annual Meeting. Specifically, it identifies the proposals on which you are being asked to vote, provides information you may find useful in determining how to vote and describes the voting procedures.

Q: Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the full set of proxy materials?

A:This year, we are once again pleased to be using the SEC rule that allows companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to many of our stockholders a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders receiving the notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and request a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials. In addition, the notice contains instructions on how you may request to access proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically on an ongoing basis.

Q: Why didn't I receive a notice in the mail about the Internet availability of the proxy materials?

A:We provide some of our stockholders with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy material.

Q: Can I vote my shares by filling out and returning the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?

A: No. The Notice only identifies the items to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. You cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to cast your vote.

Q:Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?
A:If you are a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner who owned our common stock at the close of business on March 24, 2016, the record date for the Annual Meeting, you are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the record date, _________________of our common stock were issued and outstanding and no shares of our preferred stock were issued and outstanding.

Q:What is the difference between holding shares directly or as a beneficial owner, in street name?
A:Most of our stockholders hold their shares as a beneficial owner through a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee. As summarized below, there are some differences between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

1


Stockholder of Record: If on March 24, 2016, the record date, your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Limited, then you are considered the stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy.
Beneficial Owner: If on March 24, 2016, the record date, your shares were held on your behalf in an account with a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares held in street name. If you are a beneficial owner, these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by the organization considered the stockholder of record of your shares. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account. Your nominee has enclosed or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing it on how to vote your shares. Please note that as a beneficial owner, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from the organization that holds your shares and is the stockholder of record, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.

Q:How do I vote?
A:
Voting by Mail. Stockholders who received a paper copy of a proxy card by mail may submit proxies by completing, signing and dating their proxy card and mailing it in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope. Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received prior to the closing of the polls at the Annual Meeting in order for the votes to be recorded.
Voting via the Internet. Stockholders who received a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the Notice. Stockholders who received a paper copy of a proxy card by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card. Most of Align’s stockholders who hold shares beneficially in street name may vote by accessing the website specified in the voting instructions provided by their broker or other nominee. A number of banks and brokerage firms are participating in a program provided through Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions that offers the means to grant proxies to vote shares through the Internet. If your shares are held in an account with a broker or bank participating in the Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions program, you may grant a proxy to vote those shares via the Internet by contacting the website shown on the instruction form received from your broker or bank. Your vote must be received by 8:59 p.m. Pacific Time, on May 17, 2016.
Voting by Telephone. Stockholders of record may submit proxies by following the “Vote by Telephone” instructions on their proxy cards or on the notice of Internet availability, as applicable, until 8:59 p.m. Pacific Time, on May 17, 2016.
Voting in Person at the Annual Meeting. Shares held in your names as the stockholder of record may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting. If, however, you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and if you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you will need to bring a legal proxy from your broker or other nominee authorizing you to vote your shares. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also vote by proxy as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.

Q:What if I don’t give specific voting instructions?
A:In the election of directors, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” If you elect to “ABSTAIN” in the election of directors, the abstention will not impact the election of directors. In tabulating the voting results for the election of directors, only "FOR" and "AGAINST" votes are counted.
For the other items of business, you may vote "FOR", "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN". For these other items of business, if you elect to abstain, the abstention will have the same effect as an "AGAINST" vote.
If you indicate your choice on your proxy on a particular matter to be acted upon, the shares will be voted as indicated.
If you are a stockholder of record and you return a signed proxy card but do not indicate how you wish to vote, the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by the Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement and as the proxy holders may determinesubsection entitled "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan" contained in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presentedthat section for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If you do not return the proxy card, your shares will not be voted and will not be deemed present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists.
If you are a beneficial owner and the organization holding your account does not receive instructions from you as to how to vote those shares, under the rules of various national and regional securities exchanges, that organization may exercise discretionary authority to vote on routine proposals (the ratificationfurther discussion of the appointmentmid-year adjustments to our 2020 Bonus Plan performance goals.

v


image91.jpg

Alignment with Stockholder Interest and Company Performance

Annual cash incentives are capped and subject to challenging performance goals tied to strategic financial goals aimed at increasing stockholder value
The majority of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP assenior management compensation is equity-based to align incentives with long-term stockholder value, with 100% performance-based MSUs comprising 60% of our independent public accountants) but may not voteCEO's 2020 total target compensation and, on non-routine proposals (eachaverage, 55% of the total target compensation of our other five proposals). We encourage you to provide instructions to your broker regarding the voting of your shares.
If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker and the broker has indicated that it does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular proposal, your shares will be considered “broker non-votes” with regard to that matter. Broker non-votes will be considered as represented for purposes of determining a quorum but generally will not be considered

2


as entitled to vote with respect to a particular proposal. Broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast with respect to a particular proposal. Thus, a broker non-vote will make a quorum more readily obtainable, but the broker non-vote will not otherwise affect the outcome of the vote on a proposal that requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote.


Q:Can I change or revoke my vote?
A:Subject to any rules your broker or other nominee may have, you may change your proxy instructions at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a stockholder of record, you may either:named executive officers
Sign2020 stockholder outreach extended to holders of more than 71% of our issued and return another proxy bearingoutstanding stock and included the Chairman of our Compensation Committee, our Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources, our Vice President, Corporate Communications and Investor Relations, and a later date prior to the time we take the vote at the Annual Meeting;
Submit a timely and valid Internet or telephone vote on a later date but prior to the time we take the vote at the Annual Meeting;
provide written noticerepresentative of the revocation to:
Corporate Secretary
Align Technology, Inc.
2560 Orchard Parkway
San Jose, California 95131
prior to the time we take the vote at the Annual Meeting; or

attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request.
If you are a our third party compensation consultant, Compensiabeneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may either:
submit new voting instructions to your broker or other nominee; or
if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker or other nominee giving you the right to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.

Q:What are we voting on and what vote is required to approve each item?
A:The proposals that will be presented at the Annual meeting, our Board's voting recommendations and the vote required and the way the vote is calculated for the proposals is as follows:



3


PROPOSALVote RequiredBoard's Voting RecommendationBroker Discretionary Voting Allowed?
Proposal 1 — To Elect Eight (8) Director NomineesA nominee must receive more "for" votes than "against" votes and the number of votes "for" must be the majority of the required quorumFORNO
Proposal 2 — To Ratify the Appointment of PwC as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal 2016Majority of Shares Entitled to Vote and Present in Person or Represented by ProxyFORYES
Proposal 3 — To Consider an Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive OfficersMajority of Shares Entitled to Vote and Present in Person or Represented by ProxyFORNO
Proposal 4 — Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the "for cause" requirement for stockholder removal of a director

66 2/3% of the Outstanding Shares of Voting Stock, meaning Common Shares OutstandingFORNO
Proposal 5 — Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority vote requirement for stockholder removal of a director

66 2/3% of the Outstanding Shares of Voting Stock, meaning Common Shares OutstandingFORNO
Proposal 6 — Amendment and Restatement of 2005 Equity Plan

Majority of Shares Entitled to Vote and Present in Person or Represented by ProxyFORNO
We will also consider any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting. As of April [___], 2016, we are not aware of any other matters to be submitted for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting, the persons named in the proxy cards will vote the shares they represent using their best judgment.


Q:What constitutes a quorum?
A:
A quorum, which is a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the record date, must be present or represented by proxy in order to hold the Annual Meeting and to conduct business. As of the record date, ___________________ shares of common stock, representing the same number of votes, were outstanding. That means that we need the holders of at least _______________shares of common stock to be represented for us to have a quorum. Your shares will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you attend the Annual Meeting in person. Your shares will be considered present and represented by proxy if you submit a properly executed proxy card or vote via the Internet or by telephone. Under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, abstentions and broker “non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote and so are included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.

Q:Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?
A:We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of proxy materials. The original solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone and other means by directors, and employees of Align. None of these officers, directors or employees will receive special compensation for such services. In addition, we may reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding these proxy materials to you. We have also retained Alliance Advisors LLC to assist us in the solicitation of proxies. Alliance Advisors LLC will solicit proxies on our behalf from individuals, brokers, bank nominees and other institutional holders in the same manner described above. Alliance Advisors LLC will receive a fee of $7,500 plus approved and reasonable out of pocket expenses for these services.



4vi


Q:Who will count the vote?
A:We expect a representative from the Company will tabulate the proxies and act as inspector of the election.

Q:What is the Company’s website address?
A.
Our website address is www.aligntech.com. We make this proxy statement, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended available on our website in the Investor Relations section, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
This information is also available free of charge at www.sec.gov, an Internet site maintained by the SEC that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that are filed electronically with the SEC. Stockholders may obtain free copies of the documents filed with the SEC by contacting our Investor Relations department at by sending a written request to Align Technology, Inc, 2560 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131, Attn: Investor Relations or by sending an email to investorinfo@aligntech.com.

Q:Where can I find the voting results of the meeting?
A:
The preliminary results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. The final results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we will file with the SEC by May 24, 2016.

Q:  What if multiple stockholders share the same address?
A:  To reduce expenses, in some cases, we are delivering one set of voting materials to certain stockholders who share a single address, unless otherwise requested by one of the stockholders.  A separate proxy card is included in the voting materials for each of these stockholders.  If you have only received one set, you may request separate copies of the voting materials at no additional cost to you by calling us at (408) 470-1000 or by writing to us at Align Technology, Inc., 2560 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131, Attn:  Investor Relations.  You may also contact us by calling or writing if you would like to receive separate materials for future annual meetings.

Q:Is there any information that I should know regarding future annual meetings?
A:Stockholder proposals may be included in our proxy statement for an annual meeting so long as they are provided to us on a timely basis and satisfy the other conditions set forth in SEC regulations under Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the annual meeting to be held in 2017, we must receive the proposal at our principal executive offices, addressed to the Corporate Secretary, no later than December 3, 2016. In addition, a stockholder proposal that is not intended for inclusion in our proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 may be brought before the 2017 annual meeting so long as we receive information and notice of the proposal in compliance with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws, addressed to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, not later than March 19, 2017 nor earlier than February 17, 2017.

5


PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees

Our Bylaws provide that our Board is elected each year atof Directors ("Board") will consist of one or more members with the annual meetingnumber of stockholders.directors determined from time to time by resolution of the Board. As of the date of this proxy statement Align's Bylaws fix the current number of directors is set at 9. David C. Nagel is not standing for reelection at the 2016 annual meeting and is not a nominee for election.11. On the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board has nominated the 8ten persons named below for election as directors this year,at the Annual Meeting, each to serve for a one-year term or until the director'sa successor is elected or appointed and qualified. Mr. Thomas M. Prescott, who was our President and CEO immediately prior to Mr. Joseph M. Hogan and who continues to serve as a director, was not nominated to stand for re-election and will be retiring from the Board at the Annual Meeting. As a result, the Board has resolved that effective immediately upon the expiration of Mr. Prescott's term, the size of the Board will be reduced from 11 to 10 directors.
The Board unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" all of the nominees below
Kevin J. Dallas
Joseph M. Hogan
Joseph Lacob
C. Raymond Larkin, Jr.
George J. Morrow
Anne M. Myong
Andrea L. Saia
Greg J. Santora
Susan E. Siegel
Warren S. Thaler
Information concerning each of the nominees can be found in the pages that follow.

In the event any of the nomineesnominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by the then current Board to fill the vacancy. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, our Board isproxy statement, we are not aware of any nominee who is unable or will decline to serve as a director.

Our Bylaws requirestate that a director nominee will beis elected only if heshe or shehe receives a majority of the votes cast with respect to hisher or herhis election in an uncontested election (that is, the number of shares voted “for”"for" a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against”"against" that nominee). Each of our director nominees is currently serving on the Board. If a nominee who is currently serving as a director is not re-elected, Delaware law provides that the director wouldwill continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover"holdover director." Under our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director submits anin advance, a contingent, irrevocable resignation that the Board may accept if stockholders do not re-elect the director. In that situation, our Nominating and Governance Committee would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action. The Board would act on the Nominating and Governance Committee’sCommittee's recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days fromfollowing the date that the election results wereare certified.

You may either vote “For”"For" or “Against”"Against" any nominee you specify.specify, or "Abstain" from voting for any nominee. Unless marked otherwise, proxies returned to us will be voted for each of the nominees named below. If you hold your shares through a broker, bank a broker or other nominee holder or record you must instruct your broker, bank broker or other holder of recordnominee how to vote your shares so that your vote can be counted onfor this Proposal 1.
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” ALL NOMINEES

61



Information Concerning the Nominees

Joseph M. HoganKEVIN J. DALLAS

President & CEO of Wind River Systems, Inc.Committees:
Age: 58
Director since 2015
No Board Committees

57
Mr. Hogan has served as ourTechnology
Director since: 2018
Other Current Public Company Boards: None
Board Determination: Independent

Experience:
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
Wind River Systems, Inc. a software development companyCurrent President and Chief Executive Officer and a& CEO; member of ourthe Board since June 2015. Prior2020 to joining us, Mr. Hogan was Chief Executive Officerpresent
Microsoft Corporation, a software development and solutions companyCorporate Vice President Cloud & AI Business Development1996-2020
NVIDIA Corporation and National Semiconductor (now Texas Instruments, Inc.)1996 and earlier

Skills and Qualifications:
CEO experience and significant leadership roles at large public companies
Authority in strategic business development in IoT, cloud computing, discrete manufacturing, retail, financial services, media and entertainment and healthcare
Cybersecurity expertise and of the risks facing worldwide technology companies in the areas of strategy, finance, and operations
International business experience in European and Middle Eastern markets in roles that included microprocessor design, systems engineering, product management, and end-to-end business leadership

Education:
B.S.c. degree in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, England

JOSEPH M. HOGAN

President & CEO of Align Technology, Inc.Committees:
Age: 63
None
Director since: 2015
Other Current Public Company Boards: None
Board Determination: Not Independent

Experience:
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
Align Technology, IncCurrent President & CEO; member of the Board2015 to present
ABB, Ltd., a global power and automation technologies company based in Zurich, Switzerland, from 2008 to 2013. Prior to ABB, Mr. Hogan worked at CEO2008-2013
General Electric Company (GE) in a variety of executive and management roles, from 1985 to 2008, including eight years as Chief Executive OfficerCEO of GE Healthcare from 2000 to 2008. Mr. Hogan earned a MSBA from Robert Morris University2008 and a B.S. in Business Administration from Geneva College.earlier

Skills and Qualifications:
Significant leadership experience as a CEO and in senior leadership roles at large public companies
Strategic business, market development and sales acumen
Successful chief executive with extensive experience in leading the strategic and operational aspects of large and complex, international organizations across multiple industries including healthcare and information technology
Responsible for Align's operational objectives and serves as an integral connection between the Board and management teams, enabling alignment between the Board's strategic expectations and their implementation and execution
Education:
M.B.A. from Robert Morris University, Pennsylvania
B.S. degree in Business and Economics from Geneva College, Pennsylvania
2


Mr. Hogan is an accomplished chief executive with extensive experience in leading the strategic and operational aspects of large and complex, international organizations in the healthcare and technology industries. As the President and Chief Executive Officer of Align, Mr. Hogan is responsible for management's execution of operational objectives and serves as an integral connection between the Board of Directors and Align's management team, enabling alignment between the Board's strategic expectations and Align's current and future strategy and operations.
JOSEPH LACOB

Joseph Lacob
Co-Executive Chairman and CEO of The Golden State Warriors
Committees:
Age: 6065
Director since 1997
Board committees:
Nominating and Governance (Chair) and
Technology
Director since: 1997
Other Current Public Company Boards: None
Board Determination: Independent

Experience:
Mr. Lacob has served as a director of Align since August 1997 and has been a partner of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers (KPCB), a venture capital firm, since May 1987. In 2011, Mr. Lacob acquired
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
The Golden State Warriors of the National Basketball Association. He is currently the Managing PartnerAssociationCurrent CEO and CEOGovernor of the Warriors. PriorWarriors; member of the Board2010 to joining KPCB in 1987, Mr. Lacob was an executive with present
Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture capital firmPartner1987-2018
Cetus Corporation (now Chiron), FHP International, a health maintenance organization, and the management consulting firm of Booz, Allen & Hamilton. He was previously on the board of directors of Orexigen Therapeutics, a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of pharmaceutical product candidates for the treatment of obesity. Mr. Lacob received his B.S. in Biological Sciences from the University of California at Irvine, his Masters in Public Health from the University of California at Los AngelesHamilton1987 and his M.B.A. from Stanford University.

Mr. Lacob has demonstrated success in his business and leadership skills, serving as a partner of KPCB since 1987. In his role at KPCB, he has gained considerable technology, health care and life sciences industry experience. During his career at KPCB, Mr. Lacob has been closely involved with investments in over fifty life science companies, including the start-up or incubation of a dozen ventures, and with KPCB's medical technology practice, which includes over thirty therapeutic and diagnostic medical device companies. With this extensive business background, Mr. Lacob also brings considerable finance and investment experience that has proven to be valuable in addressing issues that arise at Align.

earlier

Skills and Qualifications:
7Accomplished business leader adept at evaluating and developing strategic opportunities
Extensive educational training and strategic business evaluation and development in technology, healthcare and life sciences industries

CEO experience and senior leadership positions with large public and private organizations

Education:
M.B.A. from Stanford University, Stanford, California
Masters in Public Health from the University of California at Los Angeles
B.S. in Biological Sciences from the University of California at Irvine

C. Raymond Larkin Jr.RAYMOND LARKIN, JR. (CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD)

(Chairman of the Board)
Age: 67
Director since 2004
Board committees:
Nominating and Governance
Mr. Larkin has served as a director of Align since March 2004. In February 2006, Mr. Larkin was appointed as Chairman of the Board. He currently is a
Principal of Group Outcome L.L.C.,Committees:
Age: 72
Nominating and Governance
Director since: 2004
Other Current Public Company Boards: None
Board Determination: Independent

Experience:
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
Group Outcome L.LC, a merchant banking firm concentrating on medical technologies. From 2001Current Principal2007 to 2007, he served as a part time Venture Partner at present
Cutlass Capital, a venture capital firm. Mr. Larkin was previously Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at firmVenture Partner2001-2007
Eunoe, Inc., a medical device company. From 1983 to March 1998, he held various executive positions with Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc., a medical instrumentation company, for which he served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1989 until 1998. Mr. Larkin also held various positions of increasing responsibility at Bentley Laboratories/American Hospital Supply from 1976 to 1983. He serves on the board of directors of Heartware, Inc., a medical device company developing implant devices for the treatment of advanced heart failure. Mr. Larkin received his B.S. in Industrial Management from LaSalle University.
Mr. Larkin brings with him considerable business experience in the medical device industry serving as President
2007 and CEO of a large public company. In his role as President and CEO of Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc., Mr. Larkin took on significant management, strategic and operational responsibilities leading that business through significant growth, including numerous mergers & acquisitions. This operational experience has proven valuable in addressing issues that have arisen at Align. With his knowledge of the medical device and health care industry, Mr. Larkin provides valuable insight to our Board. Mr. Larkin’s experience as a member of the board of directors of various public companies provides Mr. Larkin a deep understanding of the role of the board of directors and positions him well to serve as our Chairman.earlier
United States Marine Corps, Captain1970-1975

Skills and Qualifications:
Long-term CEO and senior leadership experience at large public companies with significant managerial and hands-on operational responsibilities growing companies organically and acquisitively
Deep knowledge and authority in the medical device and healthcare fields
Extensive public and private company board experience
Strong strategic business development and tactical implementation skills

Education:
B.S. in Industrial Management from LaSalle University

3


GeorgeGEORGE J. MorrowMORROW

Former EVP & Global Commercial Operations Amgen, Inc.Committees:
Age: 64
Director since 2006
Board committees:
Compensation (Chair)
69
Mr. Morrow has served as a director of Align since February 2006. From February 2011 until January 2013, Mr. Morrow served as a consultant to Compensation (Chair)
Nominating and Governance
Director since: 2006
Other Current Public Company Boards: Neurocrine Biosciences
Board Determination: Independent

Experience:
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
Amgen, Inc., a global biotechnology company. From 2003 until his retirement in February 2011, he was the Executive Vice President,companyFormer EVP & Global Commercial Operations at Amgen, Inc., where he also served as Executive Vice President of; former EVP & Worldwide Sales and& Marketing between 2001 and 2003. From 1992 to 2001, Mr. Morrow held multiple leadership positions at 2001-2011
GlaxoSmithKline Inc. and its subsidiaries, including President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. He is a member of the board of directors of Vical Incorporated, a company that researches and develops biopharmaceutical products, Safeway Inc., a food and drug retailer and was a member of the board of directors of Human Genome Sciences, Inc., a biopharmaceutical discovery and development company, from March 2011 until its acquisition in August 2012 by GlaxoSmithKline plc. Mr. Morrow holds a B.S. in Chemistry from Southampton College, Long Island University, an M.S. in Biochemistry from Bryn Mawr College and an M.B.A. from Duke University.
As a former executive vice president at Amgen and Glaxo, two large public companies, Mr. Morrow brings to our Board considerable business experience in the medical technology industry. As part of the executive leadership at Amgen, Mr. Morrow has recent front-line exposure to many of the issues facing public companies today, particularly on the operational, regulatory, financial and corporate governance fronts. Mr. Morrow's leadership skills and experience make him knowledgeable of the complex issues facing global companies today and give him an understanding of what makes businesses work effectively and efficiently. These skills and experience are extremely valuable to our Board and enable Mr. Morrow to be an effective Compensation Committee chairman.

1992- 2001

Skills and Qualifications:
Significant sales, marketing and operational global ownership roles with large publicly traded medical and healthcare technology companies
Extensive background in medical device regulatory and compliance, financial, and corporate governance
Expert in growth driven sales compensation strategies and risk mitigation controls
Accomplished leader with the skills and experience that drive business success

Education:
8M.B.A. from Duke University
M.S. degree in Biochemistry from Bryn Mawr College

B.S. degree in Chemistry from Southampton College, Long Island University
Table of Contents

ANNE M. MYONG

Thomas M. Prescott
Former CEO & CFO of Aura Financial LLC
Committees:
Age: 60
Director since 2002
Technology Committee
53
Mr. Prescott served as ourAudit
Compensation
Director since: 2019
Other Current Public Company Boards: None
Board Determination: Independent

Experience:
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
Aura Financial LLC, a financial technology and consumer lending companyFormer CEO & CFO2020
Walmart Global eCommerce, a multinational consumer retail and e-commerce corporationSenior Vice President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer, until his recent retirement in June 2015. Prior to joining Align, Mr. Prescott wasand Senior Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Walmart China Retail2011-2017
Agilent Technologies ChinaVice President and Chief Executive Officer of Cardiac Pathways, Inc. from May 1999 to August 2001 and a consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation from August 2001 to January 2002 after its acquisition of Cardiac Pathways in August 2001. Prior to Cardiac Pathways, Mr. Prescott held various sales, general management and executive roles at Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc. from April 1994 to May 1999, and various management positions at GE Medical Systems from October 1987 to April 1994. In addition, Mr. Prescott served in sales, marketing and management roles at Siemens AG from December 1980 to July 1986. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from Arizona State University and Masters in Management from Northwestern University. Mr. Prescott has served as a member of the Board since joining the Company in 2002.CFO2006-2011

Skills and Qualifications:
CEO experience and senior leadership positions at large public companies
Extensive experience in global operations, finance and digital transformation with a unique expertise in international key markets
Former multinational corporation CFO with a deep understanding of financial reporting and organizational risks, controls and monitoring
Authority in consumer products and e-commerce along with developing and delivering industry transforming technology and innovations

Education:
M.B.A. degree from Harvard Business School
B.B.A. degree in Computer Information Systems from James Madison University
4


As our former CEO, Mr. Prescott 13 years of experience at our Company, he has deep knowledge and understanding of Align and its business. Mr. Prescott’s prior experience as CEO of another publicly traded medical device company demonstrates his leadership capability and business acumen. His experience with strategic and operational issues in the life sciences industry along with his service on the board of directors of other companies in this industry gives him insight into the issues facing this industry and brings valuable expertise to our Board and our Technology Committee.
ANDREA L. SAIA

Andrea L. Saia
Age: 58
Director since 2013
Board committees: Audit
Ms. Saia has served as a director of Align since July 2013. Ms. Saia was previously theFormer Global Head of Vision Care, in the Novartis AG.
Committees:
Age: 63
Audit
Compensation
Technology    
Director since: 2013
Other Current Public Company Boards: LivaNova PLC
Board Determination: Independent

Experience:
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
Alcon, a division of Novartis AG, from 2011 until her retirement in 2012. Prior to this role, she served as President and Chief Executive Officera global healthcare solution providerFormer Global Head of Vision Care2011-2012
CibaVision Corporation, a subsidiary of Novartis from 2008 to 2011. From 2005 to 2007, she relocated to SwitzerlandPresident and served as Chief Executive Officer; member of the Board2008-2011
CibaVision Corporation, a subsidiary of NovartisPresident of Europe, Middle East, and Africa operations CibaVision’s largest regional business unit. She initially joined 2005-2007
CibaVision in 2002 as Corporation, a subsidiary of NovartisGlobal Head of Marketing, and was promoted to President of the Global Lens Business the following year. Prior to Novartis, Ms. Saia was the Chief Marketing Officer for 2002-2005
GCG Partners Inc. Ms. Saia also held senior management and marketing positions with global consumer products companies such as, Procter & Gamble, Co., Unilever, and Revlon Inc.. Ms. Saia earned an M.B.A. from J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Business2002 and a B.S. in BusinessAdministration from Miami University. Ms. Saia also serves on the board of directors of Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., the marketer, producer and distributor of Coca-Cola products in European markets.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Ms. Saia brings to the Board extensive global business experience, a broad understanding of the healthcare, medical device and consumer products industries, strong management skills and operational expertise through her positions at Novartis. In those positions, she dealt with a wide range of issues as they rebuilt and strengthened the innovation and operating functions, and delivered industry leading sales and profit growth. The Board believes that her extensive knowledge of healthcare, medical device and consumer products industries provides her with insights that are particularly helpful and valuable to our board. In addition, Ms. Saia also serves on the board of directors of another publicly traded company, which gives her insight and perspective into current best practices at the board level and enables her to be an effective contributing member of our Board and our Audit Committee, and a strong addition to the Compensation Committee and Technology Committee.

earlier


9


Recent Public Board Experience:
GregCoca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.

Skills and Qualifications:
Successful CEO with additional senior leadership positions at large public companies
Accomplished global business executive with over 30 years of experience in the medical technology and consumer products industries with multinational companies
Extensive global sales and marketing and strategic business development experience
Significant board experience with multinational and other public companies

Education:
B.S. degree in Business Administration from Miami University
M.B.A. degree from J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Business
5


GREG J. SantoraSANTORA

Former CFO of Shopping.comCommittees:
Age: 6469
Director since 2003
Board committees:
Audit (Chair) and
Compensation
Director since: 2003
Other Current Public Company Boards: None
Board Determination: Independent

Experience:
Mr. Santora has served as a director of Align since July 2003. Mr. Santora served as Chief Financial Officer at
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
Shopping.com, a provider of internet-based comparison shoppingInternet-based comparison-shopping resources from December 2003 until September 2005. From 1997 through 2002, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Former CFO; member of the Board2003-2005
Intuit Inc., a provider of small business and personal finance software. Prior to Intuit, Mr. Santora spent nearly 13 years at softwareCFO and Senior VP1997-2002
Apple Computer, in various senior financiala global provider of personal and commercial business hardware and softwareSenior Financial positions including Senior Finance Director of Apple Americas and Senior Director of Internal Consulting and Audit. Mr. Santora, who began his accounting career with Audit1984-1997
Arthur Andersen L.L.P.LLP1974 and earlier

Recent Public Board Experience:
RetailMeNot, Inc.

Skills and Qualifications:
A CPA with over 35 years of large public company CFO and major audit firm senior leadership positions
Authority in e-commerce and financial software, accounting and finance
Expert in compliance, financial reporting and audits
Extensive insight and perspective into current risk identification, internal control development and risk mitigation best practices

Education:
M.B.A. from San Jose State University
B.S. degree in Accounting from the University of Illinois











6


SUSAN E. SIEGEL

Former Chief Innovation Officer of General Electric CompanyCommittees:
Age: 60
Nominating and Governance
Technology
Director since: 2017
Other Current Public Company Boards: Illumina, Inc., has beenNevro, Inc.
Board Determination: Independent

Experience:
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
General Electric and GE Business Innovations, respectively, a CPA since 1974. He serves onglobal digital and industrial solutions providerFormer Chief Innovation Officer and former Chief Executive Officer, respectively2017 to 2019
GE Ventures, a venture capital subsidiary of General ElectricCEO2012-2017
Mohr Davidow Ventures, a healthcare and life science investment firmVC General Partner2006-2012
Affymetrix, Inc., a DNA microarray products providerPresident and member of the board of directors1998-2006

Skills and Qualifications:
Extensive experience identifying, funding, pioneering and implementing industry-shifting ideas in the life sciences, biomedical research and healthcare industries for more than three decades
Over 20 years serving on the boards of fast growth health and life sciences companies
CEO with extensive business strategy, market building, finance, M&A, bioethical and entity risk management experience
Authority in Venture Capital, Healthcare and Life Sciences/Strategy, Operations, M&A
A successful builder of high functioning leadership and organizational teams
Education:
B.S. in Biology from the University of Puerto Rico
M.S. in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from Boston University Medical School

WARREN S. THALER

Former President of RetailMeNot, Inc., a digital coupon site, since May 2013. In addition, he served on the board of directors of Taleo Corporation, a provider of on-demand talent management solutions until its acquisition by Oracle Corporation in April 2012. Mr. Santora holds a B.S. in Accounting from the University of IllinoisGund Investment Corp.Committees:
Age: 58
Audit
Nominating and an M.B.A. from San Jose State University.Governance
Mr. Santora is an experienced financial leader with over 35 years of finance and accounting experience gained through his education and work at a major accounting firm and his later positions as Chief Financial Officer of Intuit and Shopping.com. The compliance, financial reporting and audit expertise Mr. Santora gained in his senior finance and operations roles, including as chief financial officer, has proven valuable in addressing issues that have arisen at Align during Mr. Santora’s tenure as Audit Committee chairman. Mr. Santora service on the board of directors and audit committee of another publicly traded company, gives him insight and perspective into current best practices with respect to finance organizations and the audit committee function.Technology
Director since: 2004
Warren S. ThalerOther Current Public Company Boards: None
Board Determination: Independent

Experience:
Age: 53
Director since 2004
Board committees:
Audit, Nominating and Governance, and Technology
Mr. Thaler has served as a director of Align since June 2004. Since 2001, Mr. Thaler has been President of
CompanyCurrent or Last Position or TitleTenure
Gund Investment Corporation, an investment firm owned by Gordon Gund with extensive, wide-ranging holdings in real estate as well asand public and private equity securities. Since 1990, Mr. Thaler has served on the board of directors of several privately held companies owned by the Gund family. From securitiesCurrent Consultant; former President1990 to 2005, Mr. Thaler was on the board of directors of the Cleveland Cavaliers and Gund Arena Company and from 2001 to 2005 represented the Cleveland Cavaliers as its Alternate Governor at meetings of the National Basketball Association’s Board of Governors. Mr. Thaler received his B.A. from Princeton University and his M.B.A. from Harvard University.
Mr. Thaler’s demonstrated executive level management skills make him an important advisor to our Board. His success in building businesses as well as his finance and investment experience gained at Gund and through his education makes Mr. Thaler well suited for our Audit Committee. Mr. Thaler’s business background makes him a valuable component of a well rounded Board and a key member of the Board’s audit, nominating and governance, and technology committees.
present

Skills and Qualifications:
Over 25 years' experience as a senior executive and as a member of numerous boards of directors and their audit, compensation and technology committees, with extensive involvement in various philanthropic and civic organizations, including the Foundation Fighting Blindness
Strategic emerging technology business investor and advisor
Authority in business management, operations and M&A with significant business development, board governance, and compliance and entity risk management experience
Business operations and management expert
Education:
M.B.A. from Harvard University
B.A. degree from Princeton University
There are no family relationships between any director orand any of Align’sour executive officers.


107


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Policies and Practices
Overview

We are committed to implementing and following high standards of corporate governance, which we believe areis important to the success of our business, creatingcreates stockholder value and maintainingmaintains our integrity in the marketplace. The Board seeks to continuously identify areas where the Company could improve its

We maintain a corporate governance practices to increase transparencypage on our website that includes additional related information, as well as our Global Code of Conduct ("Code"), Corporate Governance Guidelines ("Guidelines"), and improve accountability. Since the last Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Board updated its corporate governances practices by doing the following:
Terminationcharters for each of the Company's Stockholders Rights Plan ("Poison Pill").standing committees of the Board. The corporate governance page can be found by clicking on the "Corporate Governance" link in the "Investors" section of our website at The Board determined to eliminate the Company's Poison Pill by allowing it to expire in accordance with its terms in November 2015.www.aligntech.com.
Approval of Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy. The Board adopted an amendment to the Company's Insider Trading Policy to prohibit executive officers, directors and employees from engaging in hedging transactions or pledging the Company' securities as collateral for loans.
In addition to these governance initiatives, the Board is seeking shareholder approval of the following amendments to the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation at the Annual Meeting, as further described in "Proposal Four" and "Proposal Five".
Eliminate "for cause" requirement for stockholder removal of a director. If approved by the requisite vote of shareholders, the amendment would eliminate the “for cause” requirement for stockholder removal of a director
Eliminate supermajority voting standard for the removal of directors by shareholders.If approved by the requisite vote of shareholders, the amendment would replace the supermajority voting requirement for the ability of shareholders to remove directors with a simple majority of votes cast.
In addition to these changes, weWe also continue to maintain a variety of policies and practices to foster and maintain responsible corporate governance, including the following:
Declassified Board. We have a declassified Board and our bylaws provide for one-year terms for our directors. All of our directors will stand for election to one-year terms at this Annual Meeting.
Majority Voting for Election of Directors. The Board of Directors has adopted majority voting for uncontested elections of directors.
Corporate Governance Guidelines—Our Board has set out its corporate governance practices in the Corporate Governance Guidelines of Align Technology, Inc., a copy of which is available on the Investor Relations section of our website located at http://investor.aligntech.com. Selected provisions of the guidelines are detailed below.
Global Code of Ethics—Conduct. Our Board has adopted a In 2020, we materially revised our Code of Business Conductto emphasize our ongoing commitment to deter wrongdoing, promote integrity and Ethics thatethical conduct, and deliver superior treatment outcomes and experiences to patients. The Code is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of Align, including Align’sour principal executive officer, principal financial officer and controller. ThisIn addition to finding the Code is intended to deter wrongdoing and promote ethical conduct among our directors, executive officers and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Investor Relations section of our website, located at investor.aligntech.com. Stockholdersstockholders may request a free copy in writing free printed copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics from Align Technology, Inc., 2560 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131,410 N. Scottsdale Rd. Suite 1300 Tempe, AZ 85281, Attn: Investor Relations or by sending an email to investorinfo@aligntech.com. We will post on our website at http://investor.aligntech.comany amendments to ourthe Code, of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as any waivers to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that are required to be disclosed by the rules of the SEC or the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.

Global Speak Up Policy. In conjunction with the revision of the Code, we also released our new Speak Up Policy to show our commitment to conducting business ethically, honestly and legally. As the name implies, our Speak-Up Policy is designed to encourage current and former directors and employees and third party business partners such as contractors, consultants, suppliers, distributors and even customers to voice their questions and concerns regarding conduct they believe in good faith to be inconsistent with the Code so that we may respond promptly, objectively, fairly and appropriately.

Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our corporate governance practices can be found in our Guidelines, a copy of which is available on our website. Our Guidelines include policies regarding the size and composition of our Board, director qualifications, independence, nominations and elections, director compensation, and leadership development and succession among other topics.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy. Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits executive officers, directors and employees from engaging in hedging transactions or pledging the Company's securities as collateral for loans.

Declassified Board. Our Board is declassified and all of our directors must stand for election annually.

Majority Voting for Election of Directors. Directors must receive a majority of votes in uncontested elections, meaning the number of votes cast "FOR" a director's election must exceed the number of votes cast "AGAINST" that director's election. As a condition of nomination, all directors submit an irrevocable resignation that becomes effective if the nominee fails to receive a majority of the votes cast and the Board accepts the resignation. If the director fails to receive the requisite votes, the Nominating and Governance Committee will promptly consider the resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject it, or whether other action should be taken.

Significant Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our Board has adoptedWe maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines.guidelines for senior management and non-employee directors as a matter of good corporate governance and to demonstrate that their interests are consistent with those of our stockholders. The ownership requirements are:
PositionStock Ownership
CEO6.0x annual base salary
Other Members of Senior Management3.0x annual base salary
Non-Employee DirectorsAmount equal in market value to $400,000
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines.
The guidelines provide that each
Each member of senior management and non-employee director should own shares of Align’s common stock equal in market value to $250,000. Directors are expected to attain the minimum level of target ownership within a period of five years from the effective date of the policy. Any new director will be expected to attain the minimum level of target ownership within a period ofhas five years from the date she or he or she is first electedbecomes subject to the Board.guidelines to attain the requisite stock ownership. Currently, all directorssuch individuals are in compliance with this policy.these guidelines.

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines. The target ownership guideline set for each executive is based on that person’s relative level of seniority and responsibility. For our CEO, the ratio is 5.0 times his annual base salary. For each executive officer other than our CEO, the ratio is 1.0 times his or her annual base salary. Once established, an executive officer’s target ownership guideline does not re-adjust automatically as a result of changes in his or
8

11


her base salary or changes in the price of the company’s stock. Executive officers are required to achieve the guideline within five years of becoming an executive officer, or, in the case of persons who were executive officers at the time the guidelines were adopted, within five years of the date of adoption of the guidelines. Currently, each executive officer is in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.

For purposes of this policy, “ownership”"ownership" includes:
shares of Alignour common stock directly held directly by the director or officer orheld in trust for the benefit of thesuch director or officermember of senior management or hisher or herhis family member living in the same household,
shares of underlying Align restricted stock units held directly, whether or not yet vested, and
50% of the gain on vested in-the-money stock options, andif any.
shares of underlying Align restricted stock units held directly by a director or officer, whether or not yet vested.
The term “ownership”"ownership" does not include unvested options to purchase our common stock or shares underlying unvested market stock units.

Role of Board.The Board has responsibilityis responsible for reviewing our overall performance rather than day-to-day operations. The Board’sBoard's primary responsibility is to oversee theour management of Align and, in so doing, serve the best interests of Alignus and itsour stockholders. The Board selects, evaluates and provides for the succession of executive officerssenior management and, subject to oversight by the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board nominates for election at annual stockholder meetings individuals to serve as our directors of Align and elects individuals to fill any vacancies on the Board. ItThe Board reviews corporate objectives and strategies and evaluates and approves significant policies and proposed major commitments of corporate resources. ItThe Board participates in decisions that have a potential major economic impact on Align. Management keeps the directors informed of Company activityour activities through regular written reports and presentations at meetings of the Board and Committee meetings.its committees.

Board Leadership Structure; Executive Sessions. We currently separate theThe roles of chief executive officer (CEO)CEO and Chairman of the Board are separated in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The CEO is responsible for setting our strategic direction after consultation and input from the Board and for our day-to-day leadership and performance, of the Company, while the Chairman of the Board provides guidance to the CEO and, in consultation with the CEO and other members of our Board, sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board. We believe that this separation of duties allows the CEO and Chairman to most efficiently use their time and to most effectively fulfill their respective responsibilities, which are critical to the future success of the Company.our success. While our bylawsBylaws and corporate governance guidelinesGuidelines do not require that our Chairman and CEO positions be separate, the Board believes that having separate positions and having an independent outside director serve as chairman is the appropriate leadership structure for Alignus at this time. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that theour independent directors of the Board will meet in executive session at least twice a year. The Board held seven meetings in 2020 and the independent directors met in suchexecutive sessions eight times in 2015.five times.
Meetings
Board Effectiveness. To ensure that our Board and its committees are performing effectively and in the best interests of Align and its stockholders, our directors perform an annual assessment of the Board, its committees and each member.

Director Attendance. For the period of her or his or herservice on the Board serviceand each applicable committee in 2015,2020, each director attended at least 75 percent75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the committees on which she or he or she serves.served.

Committees. During the year, the Board maintained an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee and a Technology Committee. Each committee has adopted a written charter that establishes practices and procedures for such committee in accordance with applicable corporate governance rules and regulations. These charters are available on the Investor Relations section of our website located at investor.aligntech.com.

Outside Advisors. The Board and each of its committees may retain outside advisors and consultants at its discretion and our expense.
12
9


Audit Committee
20152020 Meetings: 14
9
Members:


Greg J. Santora (Chair)

Anne M. Myong
Andrea L. Saia

Warren S. Thaler
Oversees and monitors our accounting and financial reporting processes, our financial statement audits, and our internal accounting and financial controls.controls
Responsible for appointing, compensating, retaining, terminating and overseeing the work of our independent auditors.auditors
Responsible for reviewing the auditorsauditors' proposed scope, approach and independence.independence
Pre-approves audit and non-audit services.services
Provides oversight and monitors our Internal Audit Department.Department
Reviews, approves and monitors our Global Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.Speak Up Policy
Oversees and reviews our risk management policies.Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Compliance Program
Oversees and reviews our cybersecurity, data privacy, and other information technology risks, controls and procedures
Establishes procedures for receiving, retaining and treating complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters.matters
None of the Audit Committee members are employees of Align, and our Board has determined that each member is independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing standards and the rules and regulations of the SEC.SEC
Our Board has determined that Mr. Santora isand Ms. Myong are each qualified as an “audit"audit committee financial expert”expert" within the meaning of the rules of the SEC and has confirmed that the other members of the Audit Committee are able to read and understand financial statements.statements

Compensation Committee
20152020 Meetings: 8

Members:


George J. Morrow (Chair) Dr. David C. Nagel
 (1)

Anne M. Myong
Andrea L. Saia
Greg J. Santora
Ensures that the Company’sour compensation programs successfully align the interest of employees, including executive officers,senior management, with those of the Company’s stockholders.our stockholders
Reviews and administers all compensation arrangements for executive officers,senior management and reviews general compensation goals and guidelines for Align’sour employees and the criteria for which bonuses are to be determined.determined
Retains, oversees, and assesses the independence of compensation consultants and advisors.advisors
Assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs.programs
May form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate, although no such delegation is currently in effect.effect
None of the Compensation Committee members are employees of Align, and our Board has determined that each member is independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing standards.standards

Nominating and Governance Committee
20152020 Meetings: 2
4
Members:


Joseph Lacob(Chair)
Lacob (Chair)
C. Raymond Larkin, Jr.

George J. Morrow
Susan E. Siegel
Warren S. Thaler
Identifies, evaluatesAt the request of the Board, conducts annual reviews and recommends nominees to the Board.makes recommendations concerning Board and senior management succession
Evaluates the composition, organization and governance of the Board and its committees.committees and identifies, evaluates and recommends nominees to the Board
Develops and recommends corporate governance principles applicable to Align
Responsible for the assessment, analysis and implementation of matters involving environmental, sustainability and governance (ESG) initiatives, including those involving our Corporate Social Responsibility efforts described further starting page 58 of this proxy statement

Technology Committee
20152020 Meetings: 1

Members:

Dr. David C. Nagel (Chair) (1)

Kevin J. Dallas
Joseph Lacob
Warren Thaler
Thomas M. Prescott
(2)

Andrea L. Saia
Susan E. Siegel
Warren S. Thaler
Reviews Align'sour technology and development activities.
activities Oversees and advises the Board on matters of innovation and technology.
technology

(1) Dr. Nagel
10


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our Compensation Committee is not standing for reelection toor has ever been a member of our senior management or an employee. None of the Boardmembers of senior management currently serves, or in 2016.
(2) Mr. Prescott was appointed to the Technology Committee in October 2015.
The Nominating and Governance Committee appointed Ms. Saia to serve onpast year has served, as a member of the Compensation Committee andor director (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the Technologyabsence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of any entity that has one or more members of senior management serving on our Compensation Committee effective immediately following the Annual Meeting, subject to her continuing membership on the Board of Directors.or our Board.

13


Process for
Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees and Relevant Criteria.

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers candidates for board membership suggested by Board members, management and stockholders of Align.stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee has also retained from time to time aperiodically retains third-party executive search firmfirms to identify independent director candidates. In considering candidates for director nominee,nominees, the Nominating and Governance Committee generally assembles all information regarding a candidate’scandidate's background and qualifications. While Align does not have a formal diversity policy for board membership, the Board seeks directors who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers, among other factors, diversity with respect to perspectives, backgrounds, skills, experience, and community involvement in its evaluation of candidates for Board membership. Such diversity considerations are discussed by the Nominating and Governance Committee in connection with the general qualifications of each potential nominee. The Nominating and Governance Committee, in its discretion, may designate one or more of its members to interview any candidate. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee may seek input from Align’ssenior management or the Board, who may interview any candidate. The Nominating and Governance Committee recommends director nominees to the Board based on its assessment of overall suitability to serve on the Board in accordance with Align’sour policy regarding nominations and qualifications of directors.

While we do not have a formal diversity policy for Board membership, the Board seeks directors who represent a mix of backgrounds, skills, and experiences, including candidates of gender, racial, and ethnic diversity, that will enhance the quality of the Board's deliberations and decisions. Moreover, our directors have diverse business and professional backgrounds, including experience in finance and accounting, venture capital, medical device, consumer products, technology, brand management and international sales, marketing and operations. Such diversity considerations are discussed by the Nominating and Governance Committee in connection with the general qualifications of each potential nominee.

The following matrix is provided to illustrate the demographic diversity and tenure distribution of the nominees for director to serve on our Board. For more information on each director’s education, qualifications and background, please refer to the section entitled "Information Concerning the Nominees" previously discussed in this proxy statement.

Anne M. MyongKevin J. DallasSusan E. SiegelJoseph M. HoganAndrea L. SaiaGeorge J. MorrowC. Raymond Larkin, Jr.Warren S. ThalerGreg J. SantoraJoseph Lacob
Gender
Male
Female
Race/Ethnicity
African American or Black
Asian or Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White or Caucasian
Tenure0-8 years (50%)15+ years (50%)

The Nominating and Governance Committee has specified the following minimum qualifications that it believes must be met by a nominee for appositiona position on the Board:
the highest personal and professional ethics and integrity;
proven achievement and competence in the nominee’snominee's field and the ability to exercise sound business judgment;
skills and experience that are complementary to those of the existing Board;
the ability to assist and support management and make significant contributions to Align’sour success; and
an understanding of the fiduciary responsibilities that is required of a member of the Board and the commitment of time and energy necessary to diligently carry out those responsibilities.

Recent Board Refreshment. Since 2017, the Board has added three new directors, each of whom has brought valuable and diverse backgrounds and perspectives to the overall composition of the Board. We are committed to maintaining a well-balanced Board that blends a diversity of backgrounds with strategic expertise in fields including technology, cybersecurity, healthcare, life sciences, medical devices, e-commerce, consumer products and manufacturing that we deem necessary for the continued growth and expansion of our business into key domestic and international markets. As a public company in the highly regulated medical device industry our directors also bring a wealth of experience overseeing sales and marketing,
11


operational, finance and accounting, regulatory and compliance and corporate governance practices essential to our success. Our refreshment process reflects this balanced approach as the Board evolves for the future needs while providing essential continuity from the invaluable perspectives of our more tenured directors.

Stockholder Recommendation of Nominees.Under the terms of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Governance Committee is required to considerconsiders recommendations for candidates to the Board from stockholders holding at least 1% of the total outstanding shares of Align common stock (stockholdersstock. Stockholders must have held such common stocktheir shares continuously for at least 12 months prior to the date of the submission of the recommendation).they submit their recommendation. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider persons recommended by Align’sour stockholders in the same manner as a nomineenominees recommended by the Board, individual board members or management.

A stockholder may also nominate a person directly for election to the Board at an annual meeting of our stockholders provided their proposal meets the requirements set forth in our bylaws and the rules and regulations of the SEC related to stockholder proposals. The process for properly submitting a stockholder proposal, including a proposal to nominate a person for election to the Board at an annual meeting, is described abovebelow in the answer to the question "Is there any information that I should know regarding future annual meetings?"

Annual meeting attendance. Align encourages,We encourage, but doesdo not require, Board members to attend the annual stockholder meeting.meetings of stockholders. Last year, one directorthree directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders.

The Board’sBoard's Role in Risk Oversight. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks the Company faces,we face, while the Board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibilityis responsible for the oversight of risk management.risks. In its risk managementoversight role, the Board has the responsibility to satisfy itselfmust be satisfied that the risk managementkey risks to our business and operations are identified and prioritized and that the processes implemented by management to respond to those risks are adequate and functioning as designed. As a critical part of this risk management oversight role, the Board encourages management to promote a culture that actively manages riskspromotes risk identification as part of Align’sour corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. Furthermore, our Board encourages full and open communication between management and the Board. Our Chairman meets regularly with our CEO and other senior members of senior management to discuss strategy and the risks facing the Company.we face. Senior management, attends the quarterlyother employees as well as consultants and advisers routinely attend Board meetings and isare available to address any questions or concerns raised by the Board on risk management-related and other matters. The Board regularly receives presentations from senior management on strategic matters involving our operations to enable it to understand our risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies. The Board also holds strategic planning sessions with senior management and other employees as well as consultants and advisers to discuss strategies, key challenges, and risks and opportunities for the Company.Align.

Our Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers thisits oversight functionresponsibilities directly through our Board as a whole, as well as through the various standing committees of our Board that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, the Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk management in areas of financial risk,and investment risks, internal controls, cybersecurity, data privacy, business continuity, crisis preparedness, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.requirements, including those related to our employee benefit plans. The Compensation Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management ofmanage risks arising from our compensation policies and programs. The Nominating and Governance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management ofmanage risks associated with Board organization, membership, and structure.

14


structure as well as long-term and emergency Board and senior management succession planning. The Technology Committee assists the Board to manage strategic and competitive risks, including technical and market risks associated with product development and investment. When a committee receives a report, the chairmanchair of the committee discusses it with the full Board during the committee reports portion of the next Board meeting. Thismeeting which then enables the entire Board to coordinate the risk oversight role.function.

Cybersecurity. To more effectively address the cybersecurity threats posed today, we have a dedicated Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") who is responsible for leading enterprise-wide information security strategy, policy, standards, process, and technology. Our information security program includes, among other things, vulnerability management, antivirus and malware protection, technology compliance and risk management, encryption, identity and access management, application security, and security monitoring and incident response. Our Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing cybersecurity risks and the cybersecurity program. In 2020, the CISO met with the Audit Committee twice to discuss our cyber risks and threats.

Data Privacy. We have various technical, administrative, and physical safeguards in place to help protect against unauthorized access to, use, or disclosure of the customer, consumer, and patient information and data we collect and store. We have a dedicated Data Privacy Officer ("DPO") who advises the business on privacy risks and assesses the effectiveness of privacy controls and compliance with various legislative and regulatory requirements. Our Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing data privacy risks, as well as steps taken by management to understand and mitigate such risks. The Audit Committee routinely receives updates from the DPO on data privacy risks we face and recommends actions to mitigate those risks.
12



Compliance and Ethics. We have a dedicated Global Compliance & Ethics Officer ("GCEO") who is responsible for implementing and maintaining an effective compliance and ethics program, including the Code, Speak Up Policy and other policies, trainings and communications related to key risk areas such as anti-bribery, anti-corruption, and ethical interactions with healthcare professionals. The GCEO is responsible for reviewing and assessing the effectiveness of our program against related laws and industry best practices. Our Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing compliance and ethics risks, as well as the steps management takes to understand and mitigate these risks.

The Compensation Committee’sCommittee's Role in Risk Oversight.In fulfilling its role in assistingto assist the Board in itsBoard's risk oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee believes thatevaluates the various elements of our compensation program mitigatesprograms to avoid encouraging and mitigating against and does not encourage excessive risk taking and instead encouragesby promoting behaviors that support sustainable value creation. The Compensation Committee annually assesses our compensation programs and has concludedbelieves that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.effect. To arrive at this conclusion, the Compensation Committee assessed our executive and broad-based compensation programs and determined thatassesses the following design features of our senior management and broad-based compensation programs' did not createprograms for undesired or unintentional riskrisks of a material nature and guardedthat they guard against excessive risk-taking:

our compensation program isprograms are designed to provide a balanced mix of cash and equity, annual, and longer-term incentives in order to encourage strategies and actions that are in Align’sthe long-term best interests;interests of us and our stockholders;
base salaries are consistent with an employee’semployees' responsibilities so that they are not motivated to take excessive risks to achieve a reasonable level of financial security;
we annually assess performance under prior year compensation programs and make any adjustments deemed necessary or appropriate in order to mitigate opportunities or motives for excessive risk taking;
based on the review of prior results, we annually review and establish performance goals under our annual cash incentive plan that we believe (A) are reasonable in light of past performance and market conditions, and (B) encourage success without encouraging excessive risk taking to achieve short-term results, and, therefore, do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking;
the performance goals that determine payouts under our annual cash incentive plans are company-wide in order to encourage decision-making that is in the best long-term interests of Alignus and our stockholders as a whole;
under our annual cash incentive plans, achievement of performance goals at levels below full target reduces only the payout related to that goal, not the other goals, and therefore does not result in an “all-or-nothing” approach;
each performance goalthe amount that senior management can receive under our annual cash incentive compensation plan hasis capped as a maximum cap on achievement;of their targets in order in part to avoid excessive risk taking;
the Compensation Committee has discretion over annual cash incentive program payouts;
for our executive officers,senior management, we use a portfolio of equity based incentivesequity-based awards that incentincentivize performance over a variety of time periods with respect to several balanced goals:

Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") retain value even in a depressed market making it less likely that employees will take unreasonable risks to get, or keep, equity grant “ingrants "in the money”money"; and
performance-basedPerformance-based market stock units ("MSUs") measure relative stockholder return over a three-year performance cycle;cycle, thereby retaining value even if the price of our stock decreases in a market downturn; and
executive officers aresenior management is subject to material share ownership guidelines.

Director Independence

In accordance with the NASDAQ listing standards, the Board undertook its annual review of the independence of its directors and considered whether any director had a material relationship with Alignus or itssenior management that could compromise hisher or herhis ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out hisher or herhis responsibilities. As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that Kevin J. Dallas, Joseph Lacob, C. Raymond Larkin, Jr., George J. Morrow, Dr. David C. Nagel,Anne M. Myong, Andrea L. Saia, Greg J. Santora, Susan E. Siegel and Warren S. Thaler are “independent"independent directors." Since Mr. Prescott was employed by Align as recently as 2015 and since Mr. Hogan is currently employed by Align, neither qualifies as our President and CEO, the Board determined that he is not independent.

Although Mr. Prescott's tenure on the Board will end once his current term expires at the Annual Meeting, the Board nonetheless considered his independence during 2020. Because his employment as our President and CEO ended in 2015 after more than a decade, the Board determined that he should not be considered independent.
13



Stockholder Communications with Board

Stockholders may communicate directly with theour non-management directors of Align by sending an email to Board@aligntech.com. Our General Counsel monitors theseThese communications and ensures thatare monitored to ensure appropriate summaries of all received messages are provided to the Board at its regularly scheduled meetings. In addition, the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee has access to this email address and may monitor communications at his option. Where the nature of a communication warrants, our General CounselSenior Vice President, Chief Legal and Regulatory Officer may decide to obtain the more immediate attention of the appropriate committee of the Board or a non-management director, or Align’ssenior management or independent advisors. After reviewing stockholder messages, our Board will determine whether anyan appropriate response isif they deem a response necessary or warranted.

15


Director Compensation
Cash Compensation
In early 2014,Our director compensation program is designed both to attract and fairly compensate highly qualified, non-employee directors to represent and act in the best interests of our stockholders, employees, and the communities we serve. For the purpose of determining non-employee director compensation for 2020, the Compensation Committee requested an updated analysisengaged Compensia to evaluate the competitiveness of our non-employeeprogram. The Compensation Committee considered an overview of the corporate governance environment as well as recent trends and developments relating to director compensation. The Compensation Committee also specifically considered the amounts payable under and the various components of our director compensation policy from Compensia, Inc.,program, as well as the Committee's independentaggregate director compensation advisor. Compensia undertook a detailed reviewcost, in comparison to the boards of recent board compensation trends, includingdirectors of the formsame group of peer companies that the Compensation Committee used in determining senior management compensation. (For further details on our peer group, see the discussion of our "Peer Group" in the Compensation Discussion and amount of cash compensation and equity grants, chairperson retainers and stock ownership guidelines. Compensia also analyzedAnalysis section below). For 2020, the Board's compensation against our compensation peer group. The analysis showed that the Board compensation practices were, in aggregate, generally aligned with market norms and emerging best practices other thanand no changes were made to the provision of per meeting fees. After reviewing the data and analysis prepared by Compensia, theprogram.

Cash Compensation Committee approved, and the Board subsequently ratified, a revised

Our cash compensation program for non-employee director compensation policy. The revised policy, which became effective on July 1, 2014, eliminated per meeting fees which were replaced with the following:directors for fiscal 2020 was: (all amounts paid quarterly in advance)

DescriptionCurrent Fee
Annual Retainer for Board Membership (other than Chairman)$50,000
Annual Retainer for membership on the Compensation and/or Audit Committee$13,500
Annual Retainer for Chair of Compensation Committee and/or Audit Committee$27,000
Annual Retainer for membership on the Nominating and Governance Committee and/or Technology Committee$5,000
Annual Retainer for Chair of Nominating and Governance Committee and/or Technology Committee$10,000
Annual Retainer for Chairman of the Board$210,000
DescriptionCurrent Fee
Annual Retainer for Board Membership (other than Chairman)$50,000 
Annual Retainer for membership on the Compensation and/or Audit Committee (other than the Chairman)$13,500 
Annual Retainer for Chair of the Compensation Committee and/or Audit Committee$27,000 
Annual Retainer for membership on the Nominating and Governance Committee (other than Chairman) and/or Technology Committee$5,000 
Annual Retainer for the Chair of Nominating and Governance Committee$10,000 
Annual Retainer for the Chairman of the Board$100,000 

Equity Compensation. In 2015, we grantedApril 2020, our Compensation Committee approved an annual equity grant of RSUs to our then-current board members (other than Mr. Larkin) having a long term incentive value equivalent to $300,000. For Mr. Larkin's additional responsibilities as the Chairman and each continuing non-employee director,of our Board, the Compensation Committee approved an annual RSU grant of $400,000. The actual number of shares under the RSU awards was calculated using the closing price of our stock on the date of our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, RSUs with a market value of approximately $450,000 and $325,000, respectively. Onstockholders. Accordingly, on May 13, 2015,20, 2020, each non-employee director was granted 5,500 RSUs.other than Mr. Larkin was granted an additional 2,5001,271 RSUs for his service as Chairmanand Mr. Larkin was granted 1,694 RSUs based on the closing per share price of the Board. These RSUsour stock on that date of $236.02. Each of these RSU awards vest 100% upon the earlier of (i) the one yearone-year anniversary of the grant date andor (ii) the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders following the grant date. Assuming the continued service of theeach non-employee director, each of these equity awards willare expected to vest 100% on May 13, 2016.19, 2021.

Total Compensation. The table below summarizes the compensation paid by to our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2015. Mr. Hogan,2020. As our President and Chief Executive Officer, is not included in this table because he is an employee of Align and, as such, receives noCEO, Mr. Hogan's compensation for his service on the Board. The compensation received by Mr. Hogan is shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 51.of this proxy statement.
14


Name
Fees
earned
or paid
in cash
($)
 
Stock
awards
($)(1)
  Total ($)
Joseph Lacob65,000
 323,125
  388,125
C. Raymond Larkin Jr. (2)
210,000
 452,375
  662,375
George Morrow77,000
 323,125
  400,125
Dr. David Nagel73,500
 323,125
  396,625
Thomas M. Prescott (3)
30,416
 __
  __
Andrea L. Saia63,500
 323,125
  386,625
Greg Santora90,500
 323,125
  413,625
Warren Thaler73,500
 323,125
  396,625
NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($) (1)
Total ($)
Kevin J. Dallas55,000 299,981 354,981 
Joseph Lacob65,000 299,981 364,981 
C. Raymond Larkin, Jr.100,000 399,818 499,818 
George J. Morrow82,000 299,981 381,981 
Anne M. Myong63,500 299,981 363,481 
Thomas M. Prescott
55,000 299,981 354,981 
Andrea L. Saia82,000 299,981 381,981 
Greg J. Santora90,500 299,981 390,481 
Susan E. Siegel60,000 299,981 359,981 
Warren S. Thaler73,500 299,981 373,481 
(1)The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of awards of RSUs. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value amounts will ever be realized. The RSUs are time based awards and are not subject to performance or market conditions.

(1)
The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of awards of RSUs. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value amounts will ever be realized. The RSUs are time based awards and are not subject to performance or market conditions.
(2)
Mr. Larkin is the Chairman of the Board.
(3)
Mr. Prescott retired as our President and CEO in June 2015. As a result, until June 2015, he did not receive compensation for his service on the Board. The cash amounts shown here are for Mr. Prescott's membership on the Board and the Technology Committee commencing in June 2015 and October 2015, respectively.

16


The aggregate number of stock awards outstanding at December 31, 20152020 for each non-employee director is as follows:
NameStock Awards
Kevin J. Dallas1,271 
Joseph Lacob1,271 
C. Raymond Larkin, Jr.1,694 
George J. Morrow1,271 
Anne M. Myong1,271 
Thomas M. Prescott
1,271 
Andrea L. Saia1,271 
Greg J. Santora1,271 
Susan E. Siegel1,271 
Warren S. Thaler1,271 

15
NameOption Awards Stock Awards
Mr. Lacob40,000
 5,500
Mr. Larkin60,000
 7,700
Mr. Morrow50,000
 5,500
Dr. Nagel60,000
 5,500
Mr. Prescott (1)
13,125
 356,125
Ms. Saia
 9,066
Mr. Santora
 5,500
Mr. Thaler
 5,500

(1) Mr. Prescott's equity awards were granted to him in during his tenure as our President and CEO.

17


PROPOSAL TWO
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Audit Committee of our Board has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC"), independent registered public accountants, (“PwC”), to audit the financial statements of Align for the year ending December 31, 2016.2021. In making its recommendation to appoint PwC, as Align’s independent registered public accountants, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the non-audit services rendered by PwC is compatible with maintaining the firm’sfirm's independence.

Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Although stockholder ratification of the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accountants is not required by our Bylaws or any other applicable law, the Audit Committee is submitting the selection of PwC to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee and the Board will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm.PwC. Even if the selection is ratified, our Audit Committee, at its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different firm to act as our independent registered public accountants at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders. In addition to the selection of the firm the Audit Committee and its chairperson were directly involved in the selection of PwC’s new lead engagement partner. 

Ratification of the selection of PwC requires that the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting vote “For”"FOR" this Proposal 2. An “Abstention”"ABSTAIN" vote will have the same effect as an “Against”"AGAINST" vote in this Proposal 2. Discretionary votes by brokers, banks and related agents on this routine proposal will be counted towards the quorum requirement and will affect the outcome of the vote.
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”"FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS ALIGN’SOUR INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 20162021


16



18


Fees to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 20152020 and 20142019
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by PwC for the audit of Align’sour annual financial statements for 20152020 and 20142019 and fees billed for audit-related services and tax services rendered by PwC for fiscal 20152020 and 2014:2019:
 
20202019
Audit fees (1)
$5,365,206 $4,251,382 
Audit-related fees (2)
— — 
Tax fees (3)
976,064 1,901,185 
All other fees (4)
10,255 8,330 
Total fees$6,351,525 $6,160,897 

(1)Audit fees — These are fees for professional services performed for the annual audit of our financial statements and review of financial statements included in our quarterly filings, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, and attest services, except those not required by statute or regulation. This category also includes advice on accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of interim financial statements.
(2)Audit-related fees — These are fees related to assurance and related services.
(3)Tax fees — These are fees for professional services performed with respect to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
(4)All other fees — These consist of all other fees billed to us for professional services performed and not reported under "Audit fees," "Audit-related fees" and "Tax fees."
 2015 2014
Audit fees (1)
$2,407,019
 $2,298,528
Audit-related fees (2)
275,557
 147,443
Tax fees (3)
1,091,285
 778,159
All other fees (4)
10,650
 6,150
Total fees:$3,784,511
 $3,230,280

(1)
Audit fees — These are fees for professional services performed by PwC for the annual audit of Align’s financial statements and review of financial statements included in Align’s quarterly filings, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, and attest services, except those not required by statute or regulation.
(2)
Audit-related fees — These are fees for technical advisory consultations performed by PwC that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Align’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit fees”, including fees for due diligence services and pre-implementation assessment of controls relating to enterprise resource planning ("ERP") software system.
(3)
Tax fees — These are fees for professional services performed by PwC with respect to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
(4)
All other fees — These consist of all other fees billed to us for professional services performed by PwC and not reported under "Audit fees," "Audit-related fees" and "Tax fees."

Audit Committee’sCommittee's Policy of Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee’sCommittee's policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants subject to limited discretionary authority granted to our Chief Financial Officer. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accountants and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accountants in accordance with this pre-approval and the fees for the services performed to date. All PwC services in 20152020 and 20142019 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

19
17


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD

The following is the report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors with respect to Align’sAlign's audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015,2020, which include the consolidated balance sheets of Align as of December 31, 20152020 and 2014,2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2015,2020, 2019 and 2018 and the notes thereto.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Align is comprised entirely of independent directors who meet the independence requirements of the Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market and the SEC. In accordance with the written charter adopted by the Board of Directors of Align, the purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight and monitoring of:of among other things:

the integrity of Align’sAlign's financial statements;
Align’sAlign's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
the independent registered public accountant’saccountant's qualifications, independence and performance;
the adequacy of Align’sAlign's internal accounting and financial controls; and
Align’sAlign's internal audit department.

The full text of the Audit Committee’sCommittee's charter is available on the Investor Relations section of Align’sAlign's website (www.aligntech.com)(www.aligntech.com). The Audit Committee regularly reviews its charter to ensure that it is meeting all relevant audit committee policy requirements of the SEC and the NASDAQ listing standards.

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee, among other things, is responsible for:

providing guidance with respect to Align’sAlign's relationship with the independent auditors, including having responsibility for their appointment, compensation and retention;
involved inproviding guidance with respect to the selection of the audit firm'sfirm’s lead engagement partner;
reviewing the results and audit scope;
approving audit and non-audit services;
reviewing and discussing with management the quarterly and annual financial reports;
overseeing and reviewing Align’sAlign's enterprise risk, management policies;privacy and data security; and
overseeing management’smanagement's implementation and maintenance of effective systems of internal controls.
Before selecting PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Align’s independent auditors, the
The Audit Committee carefully considered PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’srecognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of Align's independent accountants. Each year, the Committee evaluates the qualifications, asperformance and independence of Align's independent accountants and determines whether to re-engage the current independent accountants. This included a review of the qualifications of the engagement team, the quality control procedures the firm has established, as well as its reputation for integrity and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing. The Audit Committee’s review also included matters to be considered under the SEC’s rules regarding auditor independence, including the nature and extent of non-audit services, to ensure that the accountants’ independence will not be impaired. In addition,Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter required from theretained PwC as Align's independent accountants for 2021.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 with Align’s management and PwC. The Audit Committee has also discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, "Communications with Audit Committees" issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB").

The Audit Committee also has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’sPwC's communications with the audit committeeAudit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PwC its independence. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has determinedconcluded that the provision of services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPwC of non-audit related services is compatible with maintaining the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPwC as our independent accountants.

In performing its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditors the audited consolidated financial statements in Align's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent accountants the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.
Based upon this review and discussionsthe Audit Committee's discussion with management and the independent accountants and the Audit Committee’sCommittee's review of the representations of management and the report of the independent accountants to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include Align’sAlign's audited consolidated financial statements in Align’sAlign's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152020 for filing with the SEC.
Respectfully submitted by:
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Greg J. Santora, Chair
Andrea L. Saia
Anne M. MyongWarren S. Thaler

20
18


PROPOSAL THREE
ADVISORY VOTEAPPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO APPROVETHE
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS TO DESIGNATE THE COMPENSATIONEXCLUSIVE FORUM FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERSCERTAIN LEGAL MATTERS

Our Board has unanimously declared advisable, adopted and recommends that stockholders approve, an amendment to our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the "Amendment") designating the exclusive forums in which certain claims against us may be brought. The Amendment provides (i) the federal district courts of the United States shall serve as the exclusive jurisdiction for any litigation arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), unless we consent to an alternative forum, and (ii) the Court of Chancery in the state of Delaware (or, if and only if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction, another State court in Delaware or, if and only if all such State courts do not have jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware) will be the exclusive forum for certain actions involving Align unless we consent to an alternative forum. Specifically, the Court of Chancery would be the exclusive forum for (a) derivative actions or proceedings brought on behalf of Align; (b) any action or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by, or other wrongdoing by, any director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of Align to Align or our stockholders; (c) any action or proceeding asserting a claim arising pursuant to, or seeking to enforce any right, obligation or remedy under, any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law ("DGCL"), our Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws (as each may be amended from time to time) (the "Incorporation Documents") (d) any action or proceeding as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware; (e) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Incorporation Documents; or (f) any action or proceeding asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine.The Amendment also clarifies that the provision does not affect suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. The description of the Amendment is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the amendment attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A.

As more fully described in this Proposal Three, we believe that the Amendment will reduce the risk that we could become subject to duplicative litigation in multiple forums, as well as the risk that the outcome of cases in multiple forums could be inconsistent, even though each forum purports to follow Delaware law or federal securities law. Any of these outcomes could expose us to increased expenses or losses.

Reasons for the Proposal

By designating the forums in which certain claims can be brought, we intend to promote the efficient resolution of such claims and avoid duplicative lawsuits being brought in multiple jurisdictions. Since 2018, we have been subject to seven purported stockholder derivative actions in the state and district courts of California and in the district court in New York. While the New York action was eventually transferred to the California district court, these actions demonstrate that we have experienced the litigation of similar or identical claims in multiple jurisdictions, as well as the substantial cost and management distraction related to their defense. In addition, while we have always been a Delaware corporation, we recently moved our headquarters from California to Arizona. In light of the fact that we are no longer headquartered in California, the Board believes that it is prudent to adopt the Amendment to protect us and our stockholders from the potential for future harm from costs associated with the tendency of the plaintiffs' bar to file claims in multiple jurisdictions and in jurisdictions or venues the plaintiffs' bar may deem more convenient or view as more favorable for them rather than consistent and predictable for us and our stockholders overall.

Further, the ability for plaintiffs to litigate claims governed by Delaware law in state courts outside the State of Delaware may mean that claims are brought in jurisdictions which do not apply Delaware law in the same manner as the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. Even if such jurisdictions sought to apply Delaware law in a manner consistent with the courts of the State of Delaware, the outcomes of those cases and cases brought in other forums could be inconsistent with each other and with the manner in which the Delaware courts would decide such cases. In addition, the Board considered the fact that the Delaware courts are widely regarded as the leading courts for the determination of corporate law disputes in terms of precedent, experience and focus. The specialized Delaware Court of Chancery's considerable expertise has led to the development of a substantial and influential body of case law interpreting the DGCL. We expect this will provide us and our stockholders with more consistency and predictability regarding the outcome of corporate disputes, which can minimize the time, cost and uncertainty of litigation for all parties.

Further, the Board believes that designating the federal district courts of the United States as the exclusive forum for claims brought under the Securities Act promotes many of the same benefits to us and our stockholders as discussed above.

19


In reaching its conclusion to recommend that stockholders approve the Amendment, the Board considered that the exclusive forum provisions contemplated by the Amendment may in some instances impose additional litigation costs on plaintiffs in pursuing certain claims, particularly if a plaintiff does not reside in or near the State of Delaware. The Board also weighed the possibility that an exclusive forum provision may limit a plaintiff's ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which such plaintiffs may claim limits their ability to enforce certain rights. The Board believes that the benefits of the Amendment to us and our stockholders far outweigh these potential drawbacks.

Further, some plaintiffs might prefer to litigate claims under the Securities Act in a state court because it may be more convenient or viewed as being more favorable to them, or for other reasons. Again, the Board believes that the substantial benefits to us and our stockholders as a whole from designating the federal district courts of the United States as the exclusive forum for litigation arising under the Securities Act outweigh these concerns.

While the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in March 2020 that federal forum selection provisions requiring claims under the Securities Act be brought in federal court are "facially valid" under the DGCL, there is uncertainty as to whether courts in other jurisdictions will enforce provisions such as those contemplated in the Amendment, including whether a court would enforce the provision requiring claims arising under the Securities Act to be brought in the federal district courts of the United States. If the exclusive forum provision contemplated by the Amendment is found to be unenforceable in a particular action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such an annual advisory voteaction or the validity of the exclusive forum provision on appeal. Conversely, the provision contemplated by the Amendment might impose additional litigation costs on stockholders who assert that the provision is not enforceable or is invalid. The Delaware courts or federal district courts of the United States may also reach different judgments or results than would other courts, including courts where a stockholder considering an action may be located or would otherwise choose to approvebring the compensationaction, and such judgments may be more or less favorable to us than to our stockholders.

Vote Required

Approval of the Amendment requires that the holders of at least 66-2/3% of the outstanding shares of our named executive officers allows our stockholders to provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement every year, and is consistent with our policy of seeking input from, and engaging in discussions with, our stockholders on these matters. Accordingly, this year, we are again requesting you approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers disclosed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," the Summary Compensation table and the related compensation tables, notes, and narrative in this proxy statement.
As we discuss below under the caption “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program is designed to link the actions of our executive officers to business outcomes that drive value for our stockholders. We believe that the most effective way to achieve this goal is to compensate our executive officers for the achievement of specific annual financial goals, certain annual and longer-term key strategic objectives, and the realization of increased stockholder value. We believe the compensation program for our executive officers has been highly effective in achieving these objectives. Align, on a year-over-year basis, grew revenues 11% and delivered operating margins of 22.3%, despite the negative impact of foreign exchange and our Additional Aligner policy adopted during the year. Strong Invisalign case volume growth of 22.0% year over year offset much of these headwinds and enabled us to achieve revenue growth and operating margins above our original forecast. We encourage you to carefully review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 37 of this proxy statement and the compensation tables that follow for additional details on Align’s executive compensation, including Align’s compensation philosophy and objectives, as well as the processes our Compensation Committee used to determine the structure and amounts of the compensation of our named executive officers in fiscal 2015.
The following highlights key aspects of executive compensation with respect to our named executive officers in fiscal 2015:
Approximately 80% - 85% of their target total direct compensation opportunity is variable and tied to achievement of internal performance targets or Align'svoting stock price performance;
Since Align’s achievement of internal financial performance targets was slightly above target in 2015 compared to below target in 2014, each named executive officer received a greater cash incentive award compared to fiscal 2014;
Granted long-term equity awards, including performance-based market stock units, which are earned based on a comparison of Align’s stock price performance to the NASDAQ Composite index over a three-year performance period;
All of our post-employment cash compensation arrangements in the event of a change in control of Align are "double trigger" arrangements that require both a change in control plus a qualifying termination of employment before any cash payments are made.
Previously, our former CEO had a "single trigger" pursuant to which 100% of his equity would vest immediately upon a change of control of Align. With the hiring of Mr. Hogan, however, we eliminated this 100% vesting for the CEO, and Mr. Hogan's employment agreement contains a single trigger provision equivalent to the protection given to our other NEOs whereby the vesting of equity awards is accelerated only by one year immediately upon a change of control.
Executive officers are not entitled to any tax gross-up treatment on any severance or change-of-control benefits;
Align’s compensation programs are reviewed regularly by the Compensation Committee, which has determined the Company’s compensation programs do not create inappropriate or excessive risk that is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company; and
Align continued to demonstrate its prudent use of equity while balancing stockholder concerns with the motivation of our executive officers to achieve the Company’s business goals and create long-term stockholder value. In 2015, Align’s overall equity award adjusted burn rate (which counts each RSU and earned MSU award as 2.5 shares) was 3.5%.

21


We are asking you to indicate your support for the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, we are asking you to vote, on an advisory basis, “For” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:Meeting vote "FOR" this Proposal Three. An abstention vote or a broker non-vote will have the same effect as an "Against" vote in this Proposal Three.
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to Align Technology, Inc.’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion set forth on pages 37 to 49 of this Proxy Statement, is hereby approved.”
This is an advisory vote, which means that this proposal is not binding on us; however, our Board and Compensation Committee values the opinions expressed by our stockholders and will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our executive officers. You may vote for, against or abstain from voting on this matter.
OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”"FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATIONAMENDMENT TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS TO DESIGNATE THE EXCLUSIVE FORUM FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.CERTAIN LEGAL MATTERS

22
20



PROPOSAL FOUR
AMENDMENT OF ARTICLE V OF OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ELIMINATE THE “FOR CAUSE” REQUIREMENT FOR STOCKHOLDER REMOVAL OF A DIRECTOR
A Delaware court recently confirmed that a provision in a Delaware company’s organizational documents that provides that a director may only be removed “for cause” by the stockholders is not valid if the company has a nonclassified board of directors. As a result of this ruling, our Board reconsidered one of the provisions of Article V of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation relating to the removal of a director by the stockholders and determined that it is necessary to amend such provision to conform with the Delaware court’s ruling. Our Board has approved, and recommends that our stockholders approve, an amendment to Article V of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the “for cause” requirement prescribed by Article V for stockholder removal of a director. Article V currently provides that stockholders may remove a director only “for cause” and requires that the removal be approved by the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Provisions of Article V Regarding Stockholder Removal of a Director
The final paragraph of Article V imposes two requirements that must be satisfied for stockholders to remove a director:
the director may be removed only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting; and
the director may be removed only “for cause.”
Text of Article V as Proposed to be Amended by this Proposal Four
If stockholders approve this Proposal Four, but not Proposal Five (which proposes to eliminate the supermajority vote requirement for stockholder removal of a director), the final paragraph of Article V will be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“Vacancies occurring on the Board of Directors for any reason may be filled by vote of a majority of the remaining members of the Board of Directors, even if less than a quorum, at any meeting of the Board of Directors. A person so elected by the Board of Directors to fill a vacancy shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the director for which the vacancy was created or occurred and until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified. A director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed from office at any time by the affirmative vote of 66 2/3% of the outstanding shares of voting stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at an election of directors.”
Effect of this Article V Amendment
If stockholders approve this Proposal Four, Article V will be amended to eliminate the “for cause” requirement currently applicable to any stockholder action to remove a director. Upon the effectiveness of this Article V amendment, a director will be subject to removal by stockholders:
by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting; and
such removal may be with or without cause, in accordance with the provisions of the Delaware General Corporate Law.
Text of Article V as Proposed to be Amended by this Proposal Four and Proposal Five
If stockholders approve this Proposal Four and Proposal Five, the final paragraph of Article V will be amended by both Article V amendments to read in its entirety as follows:

“Vacancies occurring on the Board of Directors for any reason may be filled by vote of a majority of the remaining members of the Board of Directors, even if less than a quorum, at any meeting of the Board of Directors. A person so elected by the Board of Directors to fill a vacancy shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the director for which the vacancy was created or occurred and until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified. A director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed from office at any time by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of voting stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at an election of directors.”

23


Effect of both Article V Amendments under Proposal Four and Proposal Five
If stockholders approve this Proposal Four, Article V will be amended to eliminate the “for cause” requirement and, if stockholders also approve Proposal Five, the final paragraph of Article V will be further amended to eliminate the supermajority vote requirement currently applicable to any stockholder action to remove a director. Upon the effectiveness of both of these amendments, a director will be subject to removal by stockholders:

by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting; and
such removal may be with or without cause, in accordance with the provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Article V if this Proposal Four is not Approved but Proposal Five is Approved
If this Proposal Four is not approved by the stockholders, the current “for cause” requirement described above will remain in place and will continue to require that directors may be removed by stockholders only “for cause,” as described above. However, because Proposal Five is not subject to the approval of this Proposal Four, if Proposal Five is approved by the stockholders, stockholder removal of a director will no longer require that the removal be by the vote of the holders of 66 2/3% of the voting power of our outstanding shares of voting stock, as provided in our current Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, and will instead only require the vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of our outstanding shares of voting stock.
Vote Required to Approve this Proposal Four
Approval of the amendment of Article V of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the “for cause” requirement for stockholder removal of a director requires that the holders of at least 66-2/3% of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting vote “FOR” this Proposal Four. An abstention vote will have the same effect as an “Against” vote in this Proposal Four.
Stockholder approval of this Proposal Four is not conditioned on stockholder approval of Proposal Five.

OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT OF ARTICLE V OF OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPRATION TO ELIMINATE THE FOR CAUSE” REQUIREMENT FOR STOCKHOLDER REMOVAL OF A DIRECTOR


24


PROPOSAL FIVE
AMENDMENT TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ELIMINATE THE SUPER MAJORITY VOTE REQUIREMENT FOR STOCKHOLDER REMOVAL OF A DIRECTOR

Our Board has approved, and recommends that our stockholders approve, an amendment to Article V of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority stockholder vote requirement for stockholder removal of a director. Article V currently requires the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting to remove a director, and provides that stockholders may remove a director only “for cause.”
Provisions of Article V Regarding Stockholder Removal of a Director
Article V imposes two requirements that must be satisfied for stockholders to remove a director:
the director may be removed only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting; and
the director may be removed only “for cause.”
Text of Article V as Proposed to be Amended by this Proposal Five and Proposal Four
If stockholders approve this Proposal Five and Proposal Four, the final paragraph of Article V will be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“Vacancies occurring on the Board of Directors for any reason may be filled by vote of a majority of the remaining members of the Board of Directors, even if less than a quorum, at any meeting of the Board of Directors. A person so elected by the Board of Directors to fill a vacancy shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the director for which the vacancy was created or occurred and until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified. A director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed from office at any time by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of voting stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at an election of directors.”
Effect of Article V Amendments under this Proposal Five and Proposal Four
If stockholders approve this Proposal Five and Proposal Four, the final paragraph of Article V will be amended to eliminate the supermajority vote requirement and will be further amended to eliminate the “for cause” requirement currently applicable to any stockholder action to remove a director. Upon the effectiveness of both of these amendments, a director will be subject to removal by stockholders:

if the number of votes cast in favor of the director’s removal exceed the number of votes cast against the director’s removal; and
such removal may be with or without cause, in accordance with the provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Article V if this Proposal Five is not Approved but Proposal Four is Approved
If this Proposal Five is not approved by the stockholders, the current supermajority vote requirement described above will remain in place and removal of a director by the stockholders will continue to require the vote of the holders of 66 2/3% of the voting power of our outstanding shares of voting stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, as provided in our current Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. In addition, if this Proposal Five is not approved and Proposal Four is approved, the “for cause” requirement applicable to stockholder removal of a director, as described above, will be eliminated.

Vote Required to Approve this Proposal Five

25


Approval of the amendment of Article V of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority stockholder vote requirement for stockholder removal of a director requires that the holders of at least 66-2/3% of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting vote “FOR” this Proposal Five. An abstention vote will have the same effect as an “Against” vote in this Proposal Five.
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT OF ARTICLE V OF OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPRATION TO ELIMINATE SUPERMAJORITY VOTE REQUIREMENT FOR STOCKHOLDER REMOVAL OF A DIRECTOR



26


PROPOSAL SIX

APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE
THE ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2005 INCENTIVE2010 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Our 2005 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Incentive Plan”), which was most recently amended and restated and approved by
The stockholders at our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, allows Alignare being asked to grant stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, stock appreciation rights and other stock-based and cash incentives to employees and consultants of Align and its affiliates and to members of our Board. On March 16, 2016, our Board approvedapprove an amendment and restatement of the Incentiveour 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Amendment”"ESPP"), subject. The amendment and restatement of the ESPP is being submitted for the approval of our stockholders in order to stockholder approval. The Amendment provides:
An increase by 4,500,000 shares in the number of shares authorizedof our common stock available for issuance under the Incentive Plan,ESPP by 2,000,000 shares, from 25,668,8952,400,000 shares to 30,168,8954,400,000 shares. As of March 31, 2021, 253,444 shares of the original 2,400,000 share pool remain available for issuance under the ESPP. If the amendment and restatement of the ESPP is approved by our stockholders, the additional 2,000,000 shares would increase the total number of shares remaining available for future issuance under the ESPP to approximately 2,253,444 shares.
An additional restriction
The amendment and restatement of the ESPP was approved by the Board on the grants that non-employee directors may receive in any fiscal year, such that no non-employee directors mayMarch 24, 2021, and will not be granted in any fiscal year of Align, awards exceeding the lesser of (i) awards covering 100,000 shares or (ii) awards with a grant date fair value of greater than $1,000,000.
Restrictions on the vesting of awards under the Incentive Plan, such that awards generally will vest in full no earlier than the 1-year anniversary of the grant date although up to 5% of the shares reserved in the 2015 Plan may be granted without this minimum vesting requirement.
Flexibility for the administrator to subject awards to forfeiture or recoupment provisions,effective unless and requires (i) awards be subject to recoupment under a company clawback policy and (ii) a participant to reimburse us for any payment in settlement of an award where the participant has engaged in or failed to prevent certain misconduct.
The Incentive Plan has not been materially amended with respect to any other terms or provisions. To the extentuntil it is approved by our stockholders. If our stockholders do not approve this Proposal Six, the Incentive Planamendment and restatement of the ESPP, the amendment and restatement will not take effect, but we may continue as ifto grant rights to purchase shares under the ESPP in accordance with the current terms and conditions of the ESPP. The Board has determined that it is in the best interests of us and our stockholders that the amendment and restatement of the ESPP be approved and is asking our stockholders for their approval of the amendment and restatement of the ESPP.

Summary of the Amendment did not apply and Restatement of the ESPP

The following is a summary of the principal features of the ESPP, as amended and restated, and its operation. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the ESPP, as amended and restated, as set forth in Appendix B.

General. The ESPP was notoriginally adopted by the Board.Board in March 2010 and approved by our stockholders on May 20, 2010. The amended and restated ESPP was approved by the Board on March 24, 2021 and will not be effective unless and until approved by our stockholders. The purpose of the ESPP is to provide a means by which our employees and those of our designated subsidiaries may be given an opportunity to purchase our common stock.
The Incentive Plan is designed to allow Align to deduct in full
Shares Available for federal income tax purposes the compensation recognized by its executive officers in connection with certain awards grantedIssuance. If our stockholders approve this proposal, a total of 4,400,000 shares will be reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan.ESPP. We expect that the number of shares reserved for issuance under the ESPP will last for approximately 11 years.

Components. The ESPP includes two components. One component of the ESPP (the "423 Component") is intended to qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" under Code Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”)423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”"Code"), generally denies a corporate tax deduction for annual compensation exceeding $1 million paid to. The second component of the chief executive officer and other “covered employees,” as determined under Section 162(m) and applicable guidance. However, certain types of compensation, including performance-based compensation, are generally excluded from this deductibility limit. To enable compensation in connection with stock options, stock appreciation rights and certain restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, and other stock and cash incentives awarded under the Incentive PlanESPP is not intended to qualify as “performance-based” within the meaning ofan "employee stock purchase plan" under Code Section 162(m), the Incentive Plan limits the sizes of such awards as further described below. By approving the Amendment, stockholders will be approving, among other things, eligibility requirements for participation in the Incentive Plan, performance measures upon which specific performance goals applicable to certain awards would be based, which are the same as those currently used in the Incentive Plan, limits on the number of shares or compensation that could be made to participants, and other material terms of the Incentive Plan and awards423 (the "Non-423 Component"). The options granted under the Incentive Plan. NotwithstandingNon-423 Component are granted pursuant to rules, procedures or sub-plans adopted by the foregoing, Align retains the abilityBoard designed to grant equity awards under the Incentive Plan that do not qualify as “performance-based” compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m).
Reasons Why You Should Vote to Approve the Amendment
Long-Term Stock Ownership is a Key Component of our Compensation Objective. Our overall compensation objective is to compensate our executives andachieve tax, securities laws or other employees in a manner that attracts and retains the caliber of individuals needed to manage and staff our business in a competitive industry. Our employees are our most valuable asset, and we strive to provide them with compensation packages that are not only competitive but also that reward personal performance, help meet our retention needs and incentivize them to manage our business as owners, thereby aligning their interests with those of our stockholders.
To achieve these objectives we historically have provided a significant portion of our key employees’ total compensation in the form of equity awards through our equity incentive programs, the value of which depends on our stock performance. Our goal is for equity awards to continue to represent a significant portion of our employees’ total compensation. We believe this approach helps to encourage long-term focus and commitment from oureligible employees and provides Align with an important retention tool for key employees, as awards generally are subject to vesting over an extended period of time subject to continued service with us. In addition, we believe we must continue to use equity awards to help attract, retain and motivate employees and other service providers to continue to grow our business and ultimately increase stockholder value as we compete for a limited pool of talented people and face challenges in hiring and retaining such talent.

27


Reserving Shares Available for Granting Equity Awards is Important for Meeting our Future Compensation Needs.
Administration. A significant portion of the compensation for our senior officers is in the form of equity compensation. In addition, approximately 801 of our regular, full-time employees hold outstanding equity awards as of March 1, 2016. If the Amendment is approved, we expect that the share reserve increase will allow us to continue to grant stock-based compensation at levels we deem appropriate for at least the next 3 years, and that we will not have to restructure our existing compensation programs for reasons that are not directly related to the achievement of our business objectives. To remain competitive without stock-based compensation arrangements, it likelyThe ESPP will be necessary to replace components of compensation previously awarded in equity with cash. We do not believe increasing cash compensation to make up for any shortfall in equity compensation would be practical or advisable, because we believe that a combination of equity awards and cash compensation provide a more effective compensation strategy than cash alone for attracting, retaining and motivating our employees long-term and aligning employees’ and stockholders’ interests. In addition, any significant increase in cash compensation in lieu of equity awards could substantially increase our operating expenses and reduce our cash flow from operations, which could adversely affect our business results and could adversely affect our business strategy, including using cash flow for research and development of innovative new products, and improvements in the quality and performance of existing products.
We Manage Our Equity Incentive Program Carefully. We manage our long-term stockholder dilution by limiting the number of equity awards granted for each of our fiscal years and granting what we believe to be the appropriate number of equity awards needed to attract, reward and retain employees.
Overhang. As of March 1, 2016, Align had outstanding under the Incentive Plan stock options covering 467,880 shares and 2,542,151 unvested restricted stock units (including market-performance based restricted stock units assuming maximum levels of achievement). Accordingly, the approximately 3,010,031 shares subject to currently outstanding awards (commonly referred to as the “overhang”) represent approximately 3.8% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Subject to approval by our stockholders, the overhang resulting from the number of shares requested under the Amendment will be approximately 12.5% (which includes currently outstanding stock awards, plus shares available grant under our current available pool and the proposed pool).
Under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information” on page 36 as required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules, we provide information about shares of our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of December, 31, 2015. To facilitate the approval of this Amendment, set forth below is certain additional information. As of March 1, 2016:
80,167,047 shares of our common stock were outstanding.
The market value of one share of our common stock was $67.86.
The number of shares remaining available for future grants, under the Incentive Plan was 3,484,132.
The weighted average exercise price of all outstanding stock options was $15.37.
The weighted average remaining contractual term for all outstanding stock options was 1.94 years.
Historical Burn Rate. We look at the rate at which we grant awards under our equity incentive programs (also known as our “burn rate”) by measuring the number of shares subject to equity awards granted in a fiscal year divided by the weighted average equivalent of shares of common stock outstanding for that fiscal year. Our 3-year average adjusted burn-rate for the Incentive Plan is 4.0% (adjusted so that each full-value award is counted as two and one half shares of stock) is below the burn rate cap published by Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”), a leading proxy advisory service, for companies in our industry.
Anticipated Forfeitures. We currently forecast granting awards covering approximately 6,500,000 shares over the next 3 year period (calculated using a fungible ratio of 1.9 in accordance with the terms of the Plan), which is equal to 8.1% of our common shares outstanding as of March 1, 2016. We also anticipate cancellation of options and forfeitures of restricted stock unit awards of approximately 850,000 shares over this period (calculated using a fungible ratio of 1.9), based on our historic rates. If our expectation for cancellations is accurate, our net grants (grants less cancellations) over the next 3 year period would be approximately 5,650,000 shares (calculated using a fungible ratio of 1.9), or approximately 7% of our common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2016. The proposed share reserve under the Amendment would increase the number of available shares under the Incentive Plan from 3,484,132 to 7,984,132. If the Amendment is approved our stockholders, we expect that this increase to the share reserve would meet our equity compensation needs for approximately the next 3 years.
We Strive to use Compensation and Governance Best Practices. The new 1-year minimum vesting and forfeiture provisions above will add to the already existing compensation and governance best practices we use in the Incentive Plan and will work to strengthen the connection between equity awards and long-term performance that enhances stockholder value.

28


Summary of the Incentive Plan
The following is a summary of the material features of the Incentive Plan (as it is proposed to be amended by the Amendment) and its operation. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Incentive Plan itself. A copy of the Amendment is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B.
Purpose. The purposes of the Incentive Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide incentives to individuals who perform services to Align and to promote the success of Align’s business.
Administration. The Incentive Plan is administered by the Board or a committee designated byof the Board (in either case, the “Plan Administrator”"Administrator"). To make grantsThe Administrator has full and exclusive discretionary authority to certain officersconstrue, interpret and key employees of Align intended to be an exempt transaction under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Rule 16b-3”), the members of the committee must qualify as “non-employee directors” under Rule 16b-3. In the case of awards intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m), administration must be by a committee consisting of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m).
Subject toapply the terms of the Incentive Plan,ESPP, to designate separate offerings under the Plan Administrator has the sole discretion to select the employees, consultants, and directors who will receive awards,ESPP, to determine eligibility, to adjudicate all disputed claims filed under the number of shares covered by each award,ESPP and to determineestablish such procedures it deems necessary for the terms and conditions of awards, to modify or amend each award (subject to the restrictionsadministration of the Incentive Plan), includingESPP. Subject to accelerate vesting or waive forfeiture restrictions, and to interpret the provisions of the Incentive PlanESPP, every finding, decision, and outstanding awards.

determination made by the Administrator will, to the full extent permitted by law, be final and binding upon all parties.
Eligibility
Eligibility. . The Incentive PlanUnless the Administrator provides that nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance shares, performance units, and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) may be granted to employees (including officers) and consultants of Align and its affiliates and to membersotherwise (consistent with the terms of the Board. Incentive stock options may be granted onlyESPP and, where applicable, Code Section 423), our employees and those of our designated subsidiaries whose customary employment is at least 20 hours per week and more than 5 months in a calendar year are eligible to employees of Align or its parent or subsidiaries. The Plan Administrator will determine which eligible personsparticipate in the ESPP; except that for the 423 Component, no employee will be granted awards. In addition, the Plan Administrator may grant other incentives payable in cash or sharesan option under the Incentive PlanESPP (i) to the extent that, immediately after the grant, such employee would own 5% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our capital stock or the capital stock of any Align parent or subsidiary, or (ii) to the extent that her or his rights to purchase stock under all of our employee stock purchase plans accrues at a rate which exceeds $25,000 worth of stock (determined at the fair market value of the shares at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such rights are outstanding at any time, as determined byin accordance with Code Section 423 and the Plan Administrator toregulations thereunder. For purposes of the Non-423 Component, any employee (or group of employees) may be excluded from participation in the best interestsESPP or an offering under the ESPP if the Administrator determines, in its sole discretion,
21


that participation of Align and subject tosuch employee is not advisable or practicable for any terms and conditions the Plan Administrator deems advisable.reason. As of March 1, 2016,31, 2021, approximately 801[●] employees and 10 consultants of Align or its affiliates and 8 members of our Board were eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan.ESPP.

Shares Available underSubject to the Incentive Plan. We are asking stockholders to approve an increase of 4,500,000 shareslimits set forth in the previous paragraph, the maximum aggregate number of shares reservedavailable that any participant may purchase under the Incentive Plan. If stockholders approve the Amendment, a maximum aggregate of 30,168,895 sharespurchase period will be available for issuance under2,500 shares and the Incentive Plan. If the Amendment is not approved by stockholders, approximately 25,668,895 shares will be available for issuance.
Any shares subject to options or SARs will be counted as one share for purposes of determining the availablemaximum number of shares for issuancethat may be purchased during each purchase period by all participants under the Incentive Plan. Any shares subjectESPP will be 400,000 shares.

Offerings

The ESPP is implemented by offerings of rights to restricted stock, RSUs or performance shares or unitseligible employees. Each offering will be in such form and will contain such terms and conditions as the Administrator deems appropriate, which, for the 423 Component, will comply with Code Section 423(b) and all employees granted rights under an offering will have the same rights and privileges. The provisions of separate offerings need not be identical. The ESPP generally has a series of consecutive, overlapping 24 month offering periods, with each offering period consisting of 4 six-month purchase periods commencing generally on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The Non-423 Component will be implemented by a series of six-month offering periods with a per sharenew offering period commencing generally on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The first day of any offering is referred to as the "offering date."

An eligible employee may become a participant in the ESPP by delivering an enrollment agreement to our stock administration office (or its designee), on or unitbefore a date determined by the Administrator prior to the offering date or by following an electronic or other enrollment procedure determined by the Administrator. An enrollment agreement will authorize participant contributions, generally in the form of payroll deductions unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, which may not be less than 1% or exceed 15% of a participant's compensation (as defined in the ESPP) during the offering. Generally during an offering, a participant may change the rate of her or his participation level, except that a participant may only make one change to her or his participation level during each purchase priceperiod. Additionally, any increase in the rate of a participant's participation level will apply only to future purchase periods under the ESPP.

On the offering date, each participant is granted a right to purchase shares. An offering includes purchase periods of approximately six months in duration. The right expires at the end of the offering, or potentially earlier in connection with an employee's termination (described below), but is exercised on generally the last day on which our common stock is actively traded during the purchase period (the "purchase date"). If the fair market value of our common stock on any purchase date is lower than the fair market value of a share on the date of grant that were granted prior to May 16, 2013, will be counted as 1.5 shares for purposes of determining the available number of shares for issuance under the Incentive Plan. To the extent a share that was subject to an award that counted as 1.5 shares against the shares reserved under the Incentive Plan is recycled back into the Incentive Plan (as described below), the Incentive Plan will be credited with 1.5 shares. Any shares subject to restricted stock, RSUs or performance shares or units with a per share or unit purchase price lower than the fair market value of a share on the date of grant that were granted on or after May 16, 2013, will be counted as 1.9 shares for purposes of determining the available number of shares for issuance under the Incentive Plan. To the extent a share that was subject to an award that counted as 1.9 shares against the shares reserved under the Incentive Plan is recycled back into the Incentive Plan (as described below), the Incentive Plan will be credited with 1.9 shares. Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired shares of our common stock. As of March 1, 2016, the closing price of our common stock on NASDAQ was $67.86 per share.
If an award expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercisedthe offering date, then all participants in full or, with respect to RSUs, performance shares or units, is terminated due to failure to vest, the unpurchased shares (or for awards other than options or SARs, the unissued shares) which were subject theretooffering period automatically will become available for future grant or sale under the Incentive Plan (unless the Incentive Plan has terminated). Upon thebe withdrawn from such offering period immediately after exercise of a SAR settledtheir option on such purchase date and automatically re-enrolled in shares, the gross number of shares covered byimmediately following offering period on the portion offirst day thereof.

Purchase Price. Unless and until the award so exercised will cease to be available underAdministrator determines otherwise, the Incentive Plan. Shares that have actually been issued under the Incentive Plan under any award will not be returned to the Incentive Plan and will not become available for future distribution under the Incentive Plan, except if shares issued pursuant to restricted stock, RSUs, performance shares or performance units are repurchased by Align or are forfeited to Align due to failure to vest, such shares will become available for future grant under the Incentive Plan. Shares used to pay the exercise or purchase price of an award and/or to satisfyfor shares is the tax withholding obligations related to an award will not become available for future grant or sale under the Incentive Plan. To the extent an award under the Incentive Plan is paid out in cash rather than shares, such cash payment will not result in reducing the number of shares available for issuance under the Incentive Plan.

29


Prohibition on Repricing and Exchange Programs.  The Incentive Plan prohibits any program providing participants the opportunity to transfer outstanding awards to a financial institution or other person or entity selected by the Administrator, exchange awards for awards of the same type, awards of a different type, and/or cash, or have the exercise price of awards repriced (i.e., increased or reduced).

Options. The exercise price of options granted under the Incentive Plan is determined by the Plan Administrator and must not be less than 100%lesser of: (a) 85% of the fair market value of Align’sour common stock on the offering date, of grant (except as permitted under Section 424(a) of the Code). Options granted under the Incentive Plan expire as determined by the Plan Administrator, but in no event later than seven (7) years from date of grant. However, incentive stock options granted to stockholders owning more than 10% of the voting stock of Align must have an exercise price per share no less than 110%or (b) 85% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant and the term of such option must be no more than 5 years from the date of grant. The fair market value of Align’s common stock generally is determined by reference to the price of Align’sour common stock on the determinationpurchase date.
Options become exercisable at such times and under such conditions as are determined by
Payment of Purchase Price; Contributions. On each purchase date, each participant's accumulated payroll deductions (or other contributions) will be applied to the Plan Administrator and as are set forth inpurchase of whole shares of our common stock, up to the individual option agreements. An option is exercised by giving notice to Align specifying themaximum number of full shares to be purchasedpermitted under the ESPP and tendering payment ofa given purchase period. Currently, a participant may make contributions under the purchase price together with any applicable tax withholdings. The method of payment ofESPP only by payroll deductions, unless the exercise price for the shares purchased upon exercise of an option will be determined by the Plan Administrator. Each option grant is evidenced by an agreement that specifies the exercise price, the term of the option, the forms of consideration for exercise, and such other terms and conditions as the Plan Administrator, in its sole discretion, will determine.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A SAR gives a participant the rightpermits participants to receive the appreciation in the fair market value of Align common stock between the date of grant of the SAR and the date of its exercise. The Plan Administrator, subject to the provisions of the Incentive Plan, will have complete discretion to determine the terms and conditions of SARs granted under the Incentive Plan. However, no SAR may have (i) a term of more than 7 years from the date of grant or (ii) an exercise price below 100% of the fair market value of Align’s common stock on the grant date (except as permitted under Section 424(a) of the Code).
Upon exercise of a SAR, the holder of the SAR will be entitled to receive payment from us in an amount determined by multiplying (i) the difference between the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise over the exercise price by (ii) the number of shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised. At the discretion of the Plan Administrator, such payment may be incontribute amounts through cash, shares or a combination of both. Each SAR grant will be evidenced by an agreement that specifies the exercise price, the term of the SAR, the conditions of exercise, and such other terms and conditions as the Plan Administrator will determine.
Termination of Employment. The Incentive Plan gives the Plan Administrator the authority to vary the terms of the individual option and SAR agreements, including exercisability of the award following termination of service with Align. In the absence of a period specified in the option or SAR agreement, generally if a participant ceases to be an employee, director or consultant for any reason other than disability, death or misconduct, then the participant will have the right to exercise his or her outstanding award for 3 months (or 12 months if termination is due to death or disability) after the date of termination, but only to the extent the option or SAR is vested on the date of termination. In no event will an option or SAR be exercisable beyond its term.
Restricted Stock. Awards of restricted stock are rights to acquire or purchase shares, which vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Plan Administrator in its sole discretion. Shares of restricted stock may not be transferred by the participant until vested. Unless otherwise provided by the Plan Administrator, a participant will forfeit any shares of restricted stock as to which the restrictions have not lapsed prior to the participant’s termination of service. Participants holding shares of restricted stock will have the right to vote the shares and to receive any dividendscheck or other distributions paid on such shares; however, if dividends or other distributions are paid in the form of shares, such shares will be subject to the same restrictions as the original award. The Plan Administrator may, in its sole discretion, reduce or waive any restrictions and may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed. Each restricted stock award will be evidenced by an agreement that specifies the period of restriction, the number of shares granted, and such other terms and conditions as the Plan Administrator will determine.
Restricted Stock Units. The Plan Administrator may grant RSUs under the Incentive Plan, which represent a right to receive shares at a future date asspecified means set forth in the participant’s award agreement. Each RSUenrollment agreement prior to each purchase date.

Withdrawal. Generally, a participant may withdraw from an offering by delivering a withdrawal notice to our stock administration office (or its designee) in such form as we provide or following an electronic or other procedure determined by the Administrator. The participant will receive her or his accumulated contributions from the offering promptly after the effective date of her or his withdrawal. Once a participant withdraws from a particular offering, the participant must re-enroll in the ESPP in order to participate in future offerings under the ESPP.

Termination of Employment. Rights granted under the Incentive Plan will be evidenced by an agreement that specifies the number of shares subject to the award and such other terms and conditions as the Plan Administrator will determine. RSUs will result in a payment to a participant only if the performance goals or other vesting criteria the Plan Administrator may establish are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. Earned RSUs will be paid, in the sole discretion of the Plan Administrator, in the form of cash, shares, or a combination of both. The Plan Administrator may establish vesting criteria in its discretion, which may be based on company-wide, divisional, business unit or individual goals, applicable

30


federal or state securities laws, or any other basis, and which may include the performance goals listed below. The extent to which the vesting criteria are met will determine the number of RSUs to be paid out to the participant.
After the grantESPP terminate immediately upon cessation of a restricted stock unit award, the Plan Administrator, in its sole discretion, may reduceparticipant's employment with us and any of our designated subsidiaries for any reason. Once a participant's employment is terminated, we will distribute to such terminated employee all her or waive any vesting criteria that must be met to receive a payout and may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed. A participant will forfeit any unearned RSUs as of the date set forth in the award agreement.
Performance Units and Performance Shares. Performance units and performance shares also may be grantedhis accumulated contributions under the Incentive Plan. Each award of performance shares or units granted under the Incentive Plan will be evidenced by an agreement that specifies the performance period and other terms and conditions of the award as the Plan Administrator will determine. Performance units and performance shares will result in a payment to a participant only if the performance goals or other vesting criteria the Plan Administrator may establish are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. Earned performance units and performance shares will be paid, in the sole discretion of the Plan Administrator, in the form of cash, shares, or a combination of both. The Plan Administrator may establish performance objectives in its discretion, which may be based on company-wide, divisional, business unit or individual goals, applicable federal or state securities laws, or any other basis, and which may include the performance goals listed below. The extent to which the vesting criteria are met will determine the number and/or the value of performance units and performance shares to be paid out to the participant.
After the grant of a performance unit or performance share, the Plan Administrator, in its sole discretion, may reduce or waive any performance objectives or other vesting provisions for such performance units or shares and accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed. Performance units will have an initial value established by the Plan Administrator on or before the date of grant. Performance shares will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a share on the grant date. A participant will forfeit any performance shares or units that are unearned or unvested as of the date set forth in the award agreement.
Other Cash or Stock Awards. In addition to the awards described above, the Plan Administrator may grant other incentives payable in cash or shares under the Incentive Plan as it determines to be in the best interests of Align and subject to such other terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, including awards intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m).offering generally without interest.
Performance Goals
. Awards
Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization, Dissolution or Liquidation, or Change of restricted stock, RSUs, performance shares, performance units and other incentives under the Incentive Plan may be made subject to the attainment of performance goals relating to one or more business criteria within the meaning of Section 162(m) and may provide for a targeted level or levels of achievement including: cash flow; cash position; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; earnings per share; economic profit; economic value added; equity or stockholder’s equity; market share; net income; net profit; net sales; operating earnings; operating income; profit before tax; ratio of debt to debt plus equity; ratio of operating earnings to capital spending; return on net assets; revenue; sales growth; share price; or total return to stockholders. The performance goals may differ from participant to participant and from award to award, may be used to measure the performance of Align as a whole, or (except with respect to stockholder return metrics) a business unit or other segment of Align, or one or more product lines or specific markets and may be measured on a growth basis or relative basis to a peer group or index. The performance goals will be calculated in accordance with Align’s financial statements, generally accepted accounting principles, or under a methodology established by the Plan Administrator prior to or at the time of issuance of an award, which is consistently applied with respect to a performance goal in the relevant performance period.Control
To the extent necessary to comply with the performance-based compensation provisions of Section 162(m), with respect to any award granted subject to performance goals, within the first 25% of the performance period, but in no event more than 90 days following the commencement of any performance period (or such other time as may be required or permitted by Section 162(m)), the Plan Administrator will, in writing: (i) designate one or more participants to whom an award will be made, (ii) select the performance goals applicable to the performance period, (iii) establish the performance goals, and amounts of such awards, as applicable, which may be earned for such performance period, and (iv) specify the relationship between the performance goals and the amounts of such awards, as applicable, to be earned by each participant for such performance period. Following the completion of each performance period, the Plan Administrator will certify in writing whether the applicable performance goals have been achieved for such performance period. In determining the amounts earned by a participant, the Plan Administrator may reduce or eliminate (but not increase) the amount payable at a given level of performance to take into account additional factors that the Plan Administrator may deem relevant to the assessment of individual or corporate performance for the performance period. The Plan Administrator also may determine what actual award, if any, will be paid in the event of a participant’s termination of employment (whether as a result of death or disability or otherwise, and whether prior to or following a change in control of Align) prior to the completion of a performance period or upon a change in control of Align. A participant will be eligible to receive payment pursuant to an award intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) for a performance period only if the performance goals for such period are achieved.

31


Individual Award Limitations. The Incentive Plan contains annual individual grant limits intended to satisfy Section 162(m). Specifically, the maximum number of shares or cash (as applicable) which could be issued to any one individual in any fiscal year (i) pursuant to options or SARs is 1,000,000 shares, (ii) pursuant to restricted stock awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) is 500,000 shares, (iii) pursuant to RSUs intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) is 500,000 shares, and (iv) pursuant to performance shares intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) is 500,000 shares, and the maximum dollar value which could be awarded to any one individual in any fiscal year pursuant to the grant of performance units intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) is $5,000,000. In addition, in connection with his or her initial service with Align, an individual may be granted additional awards of up to a maximum of (i) 1,000,000 shares covering options or SARs, (ii) 500,000 shares covering restricted stock awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), (iii) 500,000 shares covering RSUs intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), and (iv) 500,000 shares covering performance shares intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Other types of incentives payable in cash under the Incentive Plan that the Plan Administrator may determine to grant have a maximum dollar value of $5,000,000 per fiscal year for any participant. No non-employee director may be granted in any fiscal year awards exceeding the lesser of (i) awards covering 100,000 shares or (ii) awards with a grant date fair value of greater than $1,000,000 (other than any awards granted to such director while he or she was a consultant or employee of Align or its affiliates).
Non-Transferability of AwardsChanges in Capitalization. . Awards granted under the Incentive Plan generally are not transferable, other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution, and all rights with respect to an award granted to a participant generally will be available during a participant’s lifetime only to the participant.
Misconduct. If a participant terminates service with Align as a result of his or her misconduct (as defined in the Incentive Plan) or the participant engages in misconduct while holding an outstanding award, then all awards granted under the Incentive Plan that the participant holds will terminate immediately and the participant will have no further rights with respect to those awards.
Minimum Vesting Requirements for Awards. In general, awards will vest in full no earlier than the 1-year anniversary of the grant date. The Incentive Plan provides certain limited exceptions to this limitation.
Adjustments. In the event ofthat any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares,common stock, other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation,
22


split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of sharescommon stock or other securities of Align,our securities, or other change in theour corporate structure affecting Align’sthe common stock the Plan Administrator,such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent diminutiondilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Incentive Plan,ESPP, then the Administrator will adjust the number and class of shares of our common stock thatwhich may be delivered under the Incentive Plan, and/orESPP, the number, classpurchase price per share and pricethe number of shares of our common stock subject tocovered by each outstanding award,option under the ESPP which has not yet been exercised, the maximum number of shares a participant can purchase during a purchase period and the award grant limitations (including the maximum number of shares issuablethat can be purchased during a purchase period by all participants under the Incentive Plan and the individual award limitations described above).ESPP.

Dissolution or LiquidationLiquidation. . In the event of Align’s proposed dissolution or liquidation, the Planoffering period will be shortened by setting a new purchase date and will terminate immediately prior to the completion of the dissolution or liquidation, unless provided otherwise by the Administrator. The new purchase date will be prior to the dissolution or liquidation. If the Administrator shortens any offering periods then in progress, the Administrator will notify each participant as soon as practicablein writing or electronically, at least ten business days prior to the effectivenew purchase date, of such proposed transaction. An award will terminate immediately prior to consummation of such proposed actionthat the purchase date has been changed to the extentnew purchase date and that the awardright will be exercised automatically on the new purchase date, unless the participant has not been previously exercised.already withdrawn from the offering.

Merger or Change inof Control. In the event of oura merger or changeChange in controlControl (as defined in the Incentive Plan)ESPP), each outstanding award will be treated asthen the Plan Administrator determines, including, without limitation, that each award be assumedsurviving corporation or substituted for by the successor corporation (or aits parent or subsidiary ofmay assume outstanding rights under the successor corporation). If the successor corporation does not assumeESPP or substitute forsimilar rights. If no surviving corporation assumes outstanding rights or substitutes similar rights, the award, options and SARsAdministrator will become fully vested and exercisable, all restrictions on restricted stock, RSUs and performance shares and units will lapse, andshorten the offering with respect to awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria generallywhich such right relates by setting a new purchase date on which such offering will end. The new purchase date will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels and all other terms and conditions met. In such event,prior to the Plantransaction. If the Administrator shortens any offering periods then in progress, the Administrator will notify participants holding options and/each participant in writing or SARselectronically prior to the date of the merger or Change in Control, that the award is fully vested and exercisable for a period of time aspurchase date has been changed to the Plan Administrator may determinenew purchase date and that the awardright will terminate upon expiration of such period. With respect to awards granted to non-employee directors that are assumed or substituted for, ifbe exercised automatically on the new purchase date, of or following such assumption or substitution such director is terminated in his or her capacity as a director other than upon his or her voluntary resignation, then he or she will fully vest in and haveunless the right to exercise options and/or SARs as to all ofparticipant has already withdrawn from the shares subject to such awards, all restrictions on restricted stock, RSUs and performance shares and units will lapse, and with respect to awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels and all other terms and conditions met. The Plan Administrator will not be required to treat all awards similarly in the transaction.offering.
Forfeiture Events.
All awards granted under the Incentive Plan will be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment rights in favor of Align under our clawback policy. In addition, the Plan Administrator may provide in an award

32


agreement that the participant’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to such award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of specified events.
Amendment and Termination of the Incentive PlanESPP. . The Plan Administrator will have the authority tomay, at any time and for any reason, amend, suspend or terminate the Incentive Plan atESPP or any time, except stockholder approvalpart of the ESPP. If the ESPP is terminated, the Administrator may elect to terminate all outstanding offering periods either immediately or upon completion of the purchase of shares on the next purchase date (which may be sooner than originally scheduled, if determined by the Administrator), or may elect to permit offering periods to expire in accordance with their terms (and subject to any adjustments described above). If an offering period is terminated prior to expiration, all amounts credited to a participant's account that were not used to purchase shares will be required for any amendmentreturned to the Incentiveparticipant (without interest) as soon as administratively practicable. Without stockholder consent and without limiting the foregoing, the Administrator is entitled to change the offering periods, designate separate offerings, limit the frequency and/or number of changes in the amount withheld during an offering period, establish the exchange ratio applicable to amounts withheld in a currency other than U.S. dollars, permit payroll withholding in excess of the amount designated by a participant in order to adjust for delays or mistakes in our processing of properly completed withholding elections, establish reasonable waiting and adjustment periods and/or accounting and crediting procedures to ensure that amounts applied toward the purchase of shares for each participant correspond with contribution amounts, and establish such other limitations or procedures as the Administrator determines in its sole discretion advisable which are consistent with the ESPP. If the Administrator determines that the ongoing operation of the ESPP may result in unfavorable financial accounting consequences, the Administrator may modify, amend or terminate the ESPP to reduce or eliminate such accounting consequence.

Participation in Plan Benefits

Participation in the ESPP is voluntary and is dependent on each eligible employee's election to participate and her or his determination as to the extent required by any applicable laws. Any amendment, suspensionlevel of payroll deductions or termination will not, without the written consent of the participant, impair any rights of any participant under any award previously granted. If stockholders approve the Amendment, the Incentive Plan will terminate on the 10-year anniversary of Align’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, unless the Plan Administrator terminates it earlier pursuant to the terms of the Incentive Plan.
Number of Awards Granted to Employees, Consultants and Directors
Subject to the annual numerical limitsother contributions. Accordingly, future purchases under the Incentive Plan, the number of awards (if any) that an employee, consultant, or director may receive under the Incentive Plan isESPP are not determinable. Non-employee directors are not eligible to participate in the discretionESPP. As of March 31, 2021, the Plan Administrator and therefore cannot be determined in advance. Our executive officers and non-employee members of the Board have an interest in this proposal because they are eligible to receive awards under the Incentive Plan. The following table sets forth: (a) the total number of shares subject to RSUs (including market-performance based restricted stock units assuming maximum levels of achievement), and (b) the weighted average per unitclosing price of RSUs granted during the last fiscal year. No other types of awards, including options, were granted under the Incentive Plan during the last fiscal year.our common stock was $[●] per share.

Name of Individual or GroupNumber of Shares Subject to RSUs (#) 
Weighted Average per Unit Value of
RSUs ($)
    
Joseph M. Hogan222,000 64.55
Thomas M. Prescott98,000 56.78
David L. White23,000 56.78
Raphael S. Pascaud24,000 56.78
Zelko Relic24,000 56.78
Roger E. George21,400 56.78
All executive officers, as a group381,320 61.30
All directors who are not executive officers, as a group138,700 57.36
All employees who are not executive officers, as a group559,962 57.16
Summary ofCertain U.S. Federal Income Tax Information

The following paragraphs are intended as a summary423 Component of the U.S. federal income tax consequencesESPP, and the right of participants to U.S. taxpayers and Align of equity awards grantedmake purchases thereunder, is intended to qualify under the Incentive Plan as of the date of this filing. The summary is based on existing U.S. laws and regulations, and there can be no assurance that those laws and regulations will not change in the future. The summary does not purport to be complete and does not discuss the tax consequences upon a participant’s death, or the provisions of Sections 421 and 423 of the tax lawsCode. Under these provisions, no income will be taxable to a participant until the shares purchased under the ESPP are sold or otherwise disposed of. Upon sale or other disposition of any municipality, state or foreign country in whichthe shares, the participant may reside. As a result,generally will be subject to tax consequences for any particular participant may vary based on his or her individual circumstances.
Nonstatutory Stock Options. No taxable income is recognizedin an amount that depends upon the grantholding period. If the shares are sold or otherwise disposed of a nonstatutory stock option with a per share exercisemore than two years from the first day of the applicable offering and one year from the applicable date of purchase, the participant will recognize ordinary income measured as the lesser of (a) the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of such sale or disposition over the purchase price, at least equal toor (b) the excess of the fair market value of a share of the underlying stock on the offering date that the right was granted over the purchase price for the right. Any additional gain will be treated as long-term capital gain. If the shares are sold or otherwise disposed of grant. Upon exercise,before the expiration of these holding periods, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal togenerally measured as the excess of the fair market value (on the exercise date) of the shares purchased over the exercise price of the option. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares would be capital gain or loss.
Incentive Stock Options. No taxable income is recognized when an incentive stock option is granted or exercised (except for purposes of the alternative minimum tax, in which case, the spread upon exercise will be an alternative minimum tax adjustment item). If the participant exercises the option and then later sells or otherwise disposes of the shares more than 2 years after the grant date and more than 1 year after the exercise date, the difference between the sale price and the exercise price will be taxed as long-term capital gain or loss. If the participant exercises the option and then later sells or otherwise disposes of the shares before the end of the 2 or 1 year holding periods described above, he or she generally will recognize ordinary income at the time of the sale equal to the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date minus the exercise price of the option and any additional gain or loss will be capital gain or loss.shares are purchased

33
23


Stock Appreciation Rights. No taxable income is recognized uponover the grant of a stock appreciation right with a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of the underlying stock on the date of grant. Upon exercise, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the amount of cash and the fair market value of any shares received.purchase price. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any lateron such sale or disposition of the shares wouldwill be long-term or short-term capital gain or loss.
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units and Performance Shares. A participant generally will not recognize taxable income at the time an award of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares or performance units are granted. Instead, he or she will recognize ordinary income in the first taxable year in whichloss, depending on how long the shares underlying the award vests (that is, becomes either (i) transferable or (ii) no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture). However, the recipient of a restricted stock award may elect to recognize income at the time he or she receives the award in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares underlying the award (less any amount paid for the shares) onhave been held from the date the awardof purchase. The Company generally is granted.

Cash Payments. A participant will recognize ordinary income upon receipt of a cash payment pursuant to any award in an amount equal to the cash received.

Tax Effects for Align. Align generally will benot entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an award under the Incentive Plan in an amount equalfor amounts taxed as ordinary income or capital gain to a participant except to the extent of ordinary income recognized by participants upon a participant and at the time the participant recognizes such income (for example, the exercisesale or disposition of a nonstatutory stock option). Special rules limit the deductibility of compensation paid to Align’s Chief Executive Officer and to each of its three (3) most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Financial Officer. Under Section 162(m), the annual compensation paid to any of these specified executives will be deductible onlyshares prior to the extent that it does not exceed $1,000,000. However, Align can preserve the deductibility of certain compensation in excess of $1,000,000 if the conditions of Section 162(m) are met. These conditions include stockholder approvalexpiration of the Incentive Plan, setting limits on the number of awards that any individual may receive and for awards other than certain stock options, establishing performance criteria that must be met before the award actually will vest or be paid. The Incentive Plan has been designed to permit the Plan Administrator to grant awards that qualify as performance-based for purposes of satisfying the conditions of Section 162(m), thereby permitting Align to continue to receive a federal income tax deduction in connection with such awards.holding periods described above.
Section 409A
. Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”) sets forth requirements with respect to how an individual may elect to defer compensation and select the timing and form of distribution of the deferred compensation. Section 409A also generally provides that distributions must be made on or following the occurrence of certain events (e.g., the individual’s separation from service, a predetermined date, or the individual’s death). Section 409A imposes restrictions on an individual’s ability to change his or her distribution timing or form after the compensation has been deferred.
Awards granted under the Incentive Plan with a deferral feature will be subject to the requirements of Section 409A. If an award is subject to and fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A, the recipient may recognize ordinary income on the amounts deferred under the award, to the extent vested, which may be prior to when the compensation is actually or constructively received. Also, if an award that is subject to Section 409A fails to comply with Section 409A’s provisions, Section 409A imposes an additional 20% federal income tax on compensation recognized as ordinary income, as well as interest on such deferred compensation. In addition, certain states such as California have adopted similar provisions.
THE FOREGOING IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE EFFECTSEFFECT OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION LAWS UPON THE PARTICIPANTPARTICIPANTS AND ALIGN WITH RESPECT TO AWARDS GRANTEDUS UNDER THE INCENTIVE PLAN ANDESPP. IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE AND REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CODE. IN ADDITION, THIS SUMMARY DOES NOT DISCUSS THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYMENT OR OTHER TAX REQUIREMENTS, THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF A PARTICIPANT’SPARTICIPANT'S DEATH OR THE PROVISIONS OF THE INCOME TAX LAWS OF ANY MUNICIPALITY, STATE OR FOREIGN COUNTRYNON-U.S. JURISDICTION IN WHICH THE EMPLOYEE OR CONSULTANTPARTICIPANT MAY RESIDE.

Vote Required andRequired; Recommendation of Board Recommendationof Directors
The
The affirmative vote of a majority of the holdersvoting power of the then-outstanding shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is required to approve the Amendment to the Align Technology, Inc. 2005 Incentive Plan, as amendedamendment and restated. Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted “FOR” approvalrestatement of the Amendment and its material terms.ESPP. An abstention vote will have the same effect as an "Against" vote in this Proposal Four.
The Board believes it is in the best interests of Align that stockholders approve the Amendment, which will (i) increase the number of shares that are available for awards under the Incentive Plan, (ii) make awards subject to minimum vesting requirements subject to certain limited exceptions and (iii) make awards subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment under certain circumstances.

34


OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THIS PROPOSAL FOUR AND RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR”"FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2005 INCENTIVEAND RESTATEMENT OF OUR 2010 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED).

24





35


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information as of December 31, 20152020 about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and rights granted to employees, consultants or members of our Board of Directors under all existing equity compensation plans, including the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2001 Stock2005 Incentive Plan and the 2005 Incentive2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, each as amended, and certain individual arrangements.

Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, RSUs and MSUs
(a)
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding optionsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column a)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders859,149 (1)$— 4,950,369 (2)(3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total859,149 $— 4,950,369
(1)Includes 631,905 restricted stock units, including 227,244 market-performance based restricted stock units at target, which have an exercise price of zero.
(2) Includes 325,665 shares available for issuance under our ESPP. We are unable to ascertain with specificity the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding rights or the weighted average exercise price of outstanding rights under the ESPP.
(3) Our 2005 Incentive Plan, as amended, provides for the granting of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock units, market stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units and performance shares to employees, non-employee directors, and consultants. Shares granted on or after May 16, 2013 as an award of restricted stock, restricted stock unit, market stock units, performance share or performance unit ("full value awards") are counted against the authorized share reserve as one and nine-tenths (1 9/10) shares for every one share subject to the award, and any shares canceled that were counted as one and nine-tenths (1 9/10) against the plan reserve will be returned at the same ratio. Full value awards granted prior to May 16, 2013 were counted against the authorized share reserve as one and one half (1 1/2) share for every one share subject to the award, and any shares canceled that were counted as one and one half against the plan reserve will be returned at this same ratio. As of December 31, 2020, we have a total of 27,783,379 shares authorized and reserved, of which 5,313,294 shares are available for issuance which excludes 688,590 of potentially issuable MSUs if performance targets are achieved at maximum payout.
25
Plan Category 
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, RSUs and MSUs (1)
 
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options (2)
 
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column)(1) (2) (3)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3,185,509 $15.14 6,550,307
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders   
Total 3,185,509 $15.14 6,550,307



(1)
Includes 2,078,136 restricted stock units, including 611,150 market-performance based restricted stock units at target, which have an exercise price of zero.
(2)
Includes 1,133,749 shares available for issuance under our ESPP. We are unable to ascertain with specificity the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding rights or the weighted average exercise price of outstanding rights under the ESPP.
(3)
Our 2005 Incentive Plan, as amended, provides for the granting of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock units, market stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units and performance shares to employees, non-employee directors, and consultants.  Shares granted on or after May 16, 2013 as an award of restricted stock, restricted stock unit, market stock units, performance share or performance unit ("full value awards") are counted against the authorized share reserve as one and nine-tenths (1 9/10) shares for every one (1) share subject to the award, and any shares canceled that were counted as one and nine-tenths against the plan reserve will be returned at the same ratio.  Full value awards granted prior to May 16, 2013 were counted against the authorized share reserve as one and one half (1 1/2) share for every one (1) share subject to the award, and any shares canceled that were counted as one and one half against the plan reserve will be returned at this same ratio. As of December 31, 2015, we have a total of 23,283,379 shares authorized and reserved, of which 4,869,639 shares are available for issuance which excludes 546,933 of potentially issuable MSUs if performance targets are achieved at maximum payout.

PROPOSAL FIVE

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Board believes that an annual advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers allows our stockholders to provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement every year, and is consistent with our policy of seeking input from, and engaging in discussions with, our stockholders on these matters. Accordingly, this year, we are again requesting that you approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers disclosed in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," the Summary Compensation table and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative in this proxy statement. Our compensation program is designed to motivate and reward exceptional performance in a straight-forward and effective way, while also recognizing the success of our business. We delivered a remarkable second half of 2020 in the midst of an unprecedented global pandemic, achieving numerous financial and operating milestones in the process, including six-month record net revenues of $1.6 billion, representing 24.8% year-over-year growth, with clear aligner net revenues up 24.7% and systems and services net revenues up 25.3% year-over-year. We believe the compensation paid to our NEOs for 2020 appropriately reflects and rewards their contributions to that performance and is aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

We encourage stockholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 28 of this proxy statement, which describes the details of our executive compensation program and the decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2020.

Shareholders are being asked to approve the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
"RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the SEC's executive compensation disclosure rules, which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables, is hereby approved."

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on Align, the Board, or the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions expressed by stockholders in their votes on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions regarding named executive officers. It is expected that the next say-on-pay vote will occur at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.

You may vote "FOR", "AGAINST," or "ABSTAIN" from voting on this matter.
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
36
26


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This section explains how we compensate our named executive officers (NEOs).(each, a "NEO" and collectively, the "NEOs,") although much of the discussion also applies to all our senior management whose titles are senior vice president and above. Our NEOs for fiscal 2015year 2020 include our CEO, CFO and three other most highly compensated members of senior management. They are:
Joseph M. Hogan, our President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO
David L. White,John F. Morici, our Chief Financial Officer
Raphael S. Pascaud, our Chief Marketing Portfolio & Business Development Officer
Zelko Relic, ourCFO and Senior Vice President, Research & DevelopmentGlobal Finance
Roger E. George,Simon Beard, our Senior Vice President Corporate and Legal AffairsManaging Director, Americas
Julie Tay, our Senior Vice President and General CounselManaging Director, Asia Pacific

In accordance with the SEC’s executive compensation disclosure rules, we have also included discussion and disclosure of compensation for Thomas M. Prescott,Raj Pudipeddi, our formerSenior Vice President and Chief ExecutiveProduct, Innovation & Marketing Officer who retired in June 2015.

Executive Summary

2020 Executive CompensationThe 2020 executive compensation program was designed to build upon our outstanding 2019 business and financial performance.
Our executive compensation program emphasizes performance-based pay:
92% of our CEO's total-target annual compensation was subject to annual performance goals or tied to the value of our common stock.
84% of our other NEO's total-target annual compensation, on average, was subject to annual performance goals or tied to the value of our common stock.
Based on strong performance following significant second quarter COVID-19 pandemic-related sales and business disruptions, we rebounded to achieve a weighted average of 361.5% of our revised financial targets resulting in our NEOs receiving annual incentive payments (bonuses) of 120% of their second half of 2020 target award opportunities.
CEO Transition.
Strong Compensation Pay PracticesCore governance principles and practices are employed to align the compensation of senior management with stockholder interests.
There were no changes to our Long-Term Incentive compensation program in 2020.
After a mid-year reassessment, we made responsible adjustments to our existing Annual Cash Incentive Plan to focus management efforts on a strong second half of 2020 recovery by resetting performance metrics and reducing the maximum potential bonus opportunity by 50%.
We continue to carefully manage equity burn rates with our overall equity-based burn rate for 2020 at 0.5% and our adjusted gross burn rate at 1.2%.

Strong Company PerformanceOur stock price increased 91.5% in 2020 as we outperformed both the NASDAQ Composite and S&P 500 Index. Our three-year total stockholder return ("TSR") of 140.5% far exceeds the NASDAQ Composite Index three-year TSR of 86.7% and the S&P 500 Index three-year "TSR" of 40.5%.
Second half 2020 net revenues were a record $1.569 billion, a 24.8% increase over the same six month period in 2019.
We shipped a record 1.1 million Invisalign cases in the second half of 2020, an increase of 33.2% compared to the same period in 2019.
Second half 2020 operating income was $390.3 million, up 40.2% compared to the same period in 2019, and 24.9% of second half 2020 net revenues.
Our cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2020 was $960.8 million which was primarily driven by strong cash flow from operations of $662.2 million.

2020 Business Highlights

2020 was dominated by tMr. Hogan,he COVID-19 pandemic and its unprecedented disruptions to our CEO, joined Align in June 2015 after the retirement of our then CEO, Thomas M. Prescott. Our board of directors conducted an extensive search for candidates to find a new CEO. The board believed that Mr. Hogan was the ideal choice as CEO due to his extensive experience in leading the strategicbusiness and operational aspects of large and complex, international organizations in the healthcare and technology industries. In designing Mr. Hogan’ compensation package, the Compensation Committee engaged its independent compensation consultant, Compensia, to examine peer CEO compensation,employees as well as pay packages for recently hired CEOs,the businesses and lives of our customers, their patients and our suppliers. In response, we reevaluated priorities, adapted to create a compensation offer that focusednew ways of doing business and developed new strategies and plans quickly and revised them frequently as conditions evolved. Throughout, our senior management remained steadfast to our objectives, focusing on aligning Mr. Hogan’s performance directly with stockholder interests. The offer also needed to be attractive when compared to other compensation opportunities available to Mr. Hogan. Following a reviewthe health and analysissafety of such data, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the following compensation package:our employees,

Annual base salary of $950,000;
A one-time signing bonus of $1,500,000;
A target annual cash incentive opportunity of 150% of annual base salary; and
An equity award of 111,000 RSUs and 111,000 MSUs.
More details of Mr. Hogan’s pay package can be found on page 51.

In connection with Mr. Prescott’s retirement, we entered into a Transition Agreement with him pursuant to which he received the following benefits: (i) seven months’ salary continuation through December 31, 2015 for an aggregate amount of $393,750; (ii) eligibility to receive a prorated annual bonus (5/12th) for 2015 as determined by the Board and based upon the recommendation of the Board’s Compensation Committee in accordance with Align’s standard practices; and (iii) a one-time bonus of $25,000 intended to assist with post-termination medical care costs (in lieu of any reimbursement of COBRA premiums).


3727

our customers and their patients, operational execution and continued progress toward our four principal pillars of Contentsgrowth: (i) International expansion; (ii) GP adoption; (iii) Patient demand & conversion; and (iv) Orthodontic utilization.

2015Align continued to set new records in the second half of Business Highlights.
In 2015, we delivered:

Net revenue growth of 11%,2020, ending the year strong with net revenues of $845.5$734.1 million and $834.5 million, in 2015the third and fourth quarters of 2020, respectively, both new quarterly records following a second quarter year-over-year decline of 41.3%. Overall, we ended the year with $2.5 billion in net revenues, up 2.7% compared to $761.72019 and we served our 9 millionth Invisalign clear aligner patient. Growth in 2014, despite negative impactthe second half of foreign exchange2020 was markedly more pronounced. We shipped 1.1 million Invisalign clear aligner cases, increasing worldwide Invisalign clear aligner volume by 33.2% compared to the same six month period in the prior year. In the fourth quarter of 2020 alone, we shipped Invisalign clear aligners to a record 77,000 doctors globally, 7,300 of which were first time customers and we trained 6,400 new doctors on the adoptionuse of our Additional Aligner policyproducts. Invisalign case submissions from iTero and other digital scanners increased to 84.0% in July 2015. Under this policy,the Americas and 73.7% internationally by the fourth quarter of 2020, up from 79.5% and 64.7%, respectively in the fourth quarter of 2019.

While we no longer distinguish between mid-course corrections and case refinements providing doctorsdid not meet the ability to order additional aligners to address either treatment needoriginal annual performance goals established at no charge. While this policy change was largely immaterial to our cash flows, it did impact the timing at which we recognize revenue. We estimate that 2015 reported revenues and pre tax income were lower by approximately $14 million due to this change.
585.2 thousand Invisalign cases shipped, up 22% from 478.0 cases in 2014, with 32.5% year-over-year volume growth from our International doctors and 17.7% year-over-year volume growth from our North American doctors.
Operating marginsbeginning of 22.3% of our net revenues, which were negatively impacted by 1.6 points2020 due to the adoption ofCOVID-19 pandemic, the Additional Aligner policy as well asCompensation Committee believes our second half recovery was directly attributable to senior management's role in response to the negative impact from foreign exchange rates.pandemic and their dedication to strong operational execution. Our second half 2020 financial highlights compared to the same period in 2019 and our three-year total stockholder return are illustrated in the graph below.
p11.jpg
Our three-year TSR is 141% compared with the three-year Nasdaq Composite Index three-year TSR of 61%.

We also repurchased a total of 1.7 million shares under a share repurchase program, returning approximately $102 million of cash to stockholders, approximately 1.0% of our diluted shares outstanding, which approximated our 2015 annual net burn rate of 1.27%.

Our executive officerssenior management continued to demonstrate solid execution of Align's keyagainst our strategic growth drivers: Market Expansion, Product Innovationdrivers. In addition to the highlights mentioned above, in 2020 we:

exocad Acquisition. Closed the $420.8 million second quarter cash acquisition of exocad Global Holdings GmbH, a German dental CAD/CAM software company that offers fully integrated workflows to dental labs and Brand Strength. In 2015:practices with expertise in restorative dentistry, implantology, guided surgery, and smile design to strengthen our digital platform and extend our digital dental solutions towards fully interdisciplinary end-to-end workflows

Virtual Solutions. Launched Invisalign Virtual Appointment and Invisalign Virtual Care, two continuity of care virtual solutions that offer practice and care transformation to doctors by enabling a range of remote practice services for their patients such as video appointments and care and treatment progress reviews and communications
We announcedSoftware Launches. Launched ClinCheck 6.0 Pro Software, the latest release of our proprietary 3D treatment planning software showing the planned tooth movements throughout a patient's Invisalign treatment, making it more broadly available to doctors on multiple innovations designeddevices at any time via the cloud. ClinCheck Pro 6.0 software also includes the ClinCheck "In-Face" Visualization tool, enhancing the digital treatment planning experience for doctors and their patients
Clear Aligner Innovations. Introduced Invisalign G8 with SmartForce Aligner Activation; a clear aligner biomechanical innovation that allows doctors to improve clinical applicabilitymore predictably treat crowding, crossbite and predictabilitydeep bite cases
Advanced Scanning Technologies. Announced U.S. FDA 510(K) clearance of treatment outcome, including:

the launch of Invisalign G6 for treatment of severe crowding and bimaxillary protrusion; and
in March 2015, we announced the next generation iTero Element Intraoral Scanner with improved imaging technology that is designed to enable significantly faster scan speed, accuracy, intuitive operation, and visualization capabilities. We began shipping the iTero Element Intraoral Scanner5D Imaging System, the first integrated dental imaging system that simultaneously records 3D, intraoral color and near-infrared ("NIRI") imaging and enables comparison over time using the iTero TimeLapse technology. NIRI technology aids in September 2015.detection and monitoring of interproximal caries lesions above the gingiva without using harmful radiation and provides a new comprehensive approach to clinical applications, workflows and user experience
We grew ourTrained 21,100 new Invisalign teenage segment 21% year over yeardoctors, 9,075 in the Americas and 12,025 internationally
Increased Invisalign total utilization rates to 16.1 cases per doctor compared to 16% 15.9in 2014, demonstrating2019
28



Alignment of Compensation with Performance

Before the COVID-19 pandemic began, our continued progressCompensation Committee believed the foundation and share gain among teenage patients.
We grew international Invisalign case shipments 32.5% year over year driven by both an increaserefinements made in recent years to our senior management compensation program were instrumental in helping us accomplish difficult strategic growth drivers quickly. The Compensation Committee believed the numberdesign and implementation of doctors submitting cases and in the number of cases submitted per doctor in our EMEA regions as well as continued expansion of our customer base in the Asia Pacific region.
We believe the compensation program formaterially contributed to our executive officers was instrumentalstrong financial performances most recently in helping Align achieve continued strong execution2019 leading to significant increases in stockholder value. After the massive disruptions to our business and the businesses of our strategic initiatives as well as solid financialcustomers in the second quarter of 2020, the Compensation Committee chose to fine-tune the program in lieu of making drastic changes. The Compensation Committee believes these adjustments provided additional motivation that helped to drive our second half performance.

38


Alignmentthe COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan" for a further discussion of Executive Compensation with Performance-Highlightsthe mid-year adjustments to our 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan ("Bonus Plan") performance goals portion of the compensation program.

With the foundation of the compensation program having been in effect for several years:

We have created long-term, sustained value for our stockholders. Our stock price increased from $56.20 to $65.85 per share during 2015, reflecting strong stock price appreciation and a one-year total stockholder return of 17%. This compares to the Nasdaq Composite Index one-year TSR of 6%. Our three-year TSR is 141%140.5% compared with the three-year NasdaqNASDAQ Composite Index three-yearTSR and S&P 500 TSR of 61%.86.7% and 40.5%, respectively.

Stockholders indicated strong support for our executive compensation program in 2015. In 2015, we held our fourth annual stockholder advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. Approximately 94% of the total votes cast at our 2015 annual meeting voted in favor of our named executive officer compensation. As we evaluated our executive compensation practices since that vote, we were mindful of the strong support our stockholders expressed for our executive compensation program. As a result, the Compensation Committee generally believes that the stockholder advisory vote affirmed stockholder support of our approach to executive compensation and they did not believe it was necessary to make any significant changes to our executive compensation program.

Our compensation program continuesWe continue to emphasize performance-based pay.Our compensation program is designed to pay more when our financial and strategic performance is robust and less when it is not, providing built-in flexibility in the management of our operating expenses and enabling us to preserve and alter strategic programs when economic conditions are unfavorable.unfavorable or warrant adjustments. A significant portion of our executive officers’the compensation of senior management is variable and tied to the success of our business and the individual performance of our executives.each member of senior management. Consistent with this pay-for-performance orientation, Align believeswe believe that annual cash incentive (bonus) awards and long-term equity compensation should together represent the most significant portion of total target direct compensation. As a result, a larger portion of our executive officers’senior management's total target compensation is at risk relative to Align’s other employees.that of our employees generally. We believe this is appropriate because our executive officersthe members of senior management bear the greatest responsibility for Align’sour results and can exert the greatest influence on Align’sour performance. As illustrated by the chartschart below, in fiscal 2015,2020, approximately 86%92% of our CEO’s total-target compensation and approximately 80% of our other named executive officers total-targetCEO's total target direct compensation was subject to annualcompletely "at-risk" based on our performance goals or tied to the value of our common stock.against measurable performance objectives.
ceo1.jpg

Annual cash incentive awards reflected positive 2015 Companystrong second half 2020 Corporate performance.The Compensation Committee seeks to motivate senior management to continuously improve theour financial performance of the Company and to achieve our key strategic prioritiesobjectives through a cash incentive (bonus) plan that rewards higher performance with increased incentive opportunities. This provides us with a variable expense structure, allowing us to reducereducing our compensation costs in challenging times and reward performancerewarding achievements when business conditions and results warrant. For fiscal 2015,Based on our strong financial results in the second half of 2020, we achieved a weighted average of 100.6%361.5% of our revised second half financial targets and key strategic objectives. In addition, based on an assessment of each NEOs performance during the year, individual performance multipliers ranging from 105% to 130% were awarded.targets. As a result, the 2020 annual incentive payments forto our NEOs were between 106% and 131%120% of their second half 2020 target award opportunity. Please see the discussion below under "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan" for a further discussion of the mid-year adjustments to the 2020 Bonus Plan.
29


Equity awards are tied to the value of our common stock.Value received under our annual equity awards varies based on our stock price performance. In particular, payouts of our MSUsthe market stock units ("MSUs") awarded to our executive officerssenior management vary based on the relative performance of our stock compared to the NASDAQ Composite Index. MSUs granted in 20152020 are earned based on Align’sour relative stockholder return over a three-year performance period, with 100% of the earned shares vesting at the end of three years. For MSUs granted in 2012February 2017 that vested in February 2015, Align2020, our stock outperformed the NASDAQ Composite Index by 70%approximately 121.2% during the applicable performance period. As a result, due to Align’s continued outstanding

39


stock price performance compared to the NASDAQ Composite Index in 2015, theour NEOs who were granted 2012 MSUs in February 2017 earned 150%a maximum payout of 200% of their February 2017 target awards. Our Compensation Committee specifically designed our MSU award program to closely tie actual long-term performance with long-term pay, and total stockholder return has been, and is expected to continue to be, the key measurement of our performance under this program.

Compensation Policies and Practices

We endeavorIn designing our compensation program, we adhere to maintain compensation governance best practices:practices, including the following:

Compensation Committee Composed Solely of Independent Directors. TheOur Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors and it directly retains an independent compensation consultant.

Annual Say-on-Pay Votes. We elected to hold ansubmit annual stockholder advisorycompensation proposals ("say-on-pay") vote,to stockholders for advisory votes, and the Compensation Committee considers the outcome of the advisory votevotes in making future compensation decisions.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. We maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines for senior management and non-employee directors as a matter of good corporate governance and to demonstrate that the interests of senior management and non-employee directors are consistent with those of our stockholders. In 2020, our stock ownership guidelines for each member of senior management other than our CEO were 3.0x their annual base salaries. Ownership guidelines for our CEO were 6.0x his annual base salary. The stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers.non-employee directors call for each non-employee director to own shares having $400,000 in market value.

No “single-trigger”"single-trigger" on Cash Compensation. All of our post-employment cash compensation arrangements in the event of a change in control of the Company are “double-trigger”"double-trigger" arrangements that requirerequiring both a change in control of the Company plusAlign and a qualifying termination of employment before any cash payments are paid. In addition, the employment agreements entered into by our CEO, CFO as well as others who join or are promoted to a senior management role after September 2016 provide that such individuals will only receive accelerated vesting of their stock if they are terminated without cause or for convenience within 18 months of a change of control (double trigger).

Annual Compensation-Related Risk Assessment. Align’s executiveOur compensation policies are structured to discourage inappropriate risk-taking by our executives. In 2015, the Compensation Committee determined to caprisk-taking. There are no guarantees that bonuses will be paid under our annual cash bonus incentive program and in 2020 awards were capped at 240% of target for our executive officers(revised mid-year to 120%) in part to discourage excessive risk taking. The Compensation Risk Assessment located on page 15 ofabove in this proxy statement describes the Compensation Committee’sCommittee's assessment that the risks arising from our company-wide compensation programs are reasonable, in the best interest of our stockholders, and not likelyunlikely to have a material adverse effect on us.

No Hedging or Pledging Companyof Our Stock. Employees may not directly or indirectly engage in transactions intended to hedge or offset the market value of Align’sour common stock owned by them.they own. In addition, in 2015, we amended our Insider Trading Policy to further prohibitprohibits employees from directly or indirectly pledging Alignour common stock as collateral for any obligation.

Carefully Manage Equity Burn Rates. We are committed to carefully managing the dilutive impact of equity compensation awards. Management and the BoardCompensation Committee regularly evaluate share utilization levels by reviewing the dilutive impact of stock compensation. Align’sFor fiscal 2020, our overall equity-award-based gross burn rate for fiscal 2015 was 1.4% and Align's adjusted gross burn rate was 3.5%.were 0.5% and 1.2%, respectively. Gross burn rate is defined as the number of equity awards granted in the year divided by shares outstanding. Adjusted gross burn rate includes a premium applied to full-value shares (e.g., RSUs and MSUs) of 2.5:1. We do not reprice, buyout or exchange underwater stock options and there is no liberal counting or recycling of shares.

2020 STOCKHOLDER SAY-ON-PAY VOTE

At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in May 2020 ("2020 Meeting"), our stockholders were asked to cast a non-binding advisory vote ("say-on-pay") to approve the compensation for our 2019 fiscal year named executive officers ("2019 NEOs"). At the 2020 Meeting, approximately 89% of the votes cast by our stockholders were in support of our "say-on-pay" proposal. Based on the results of this vote and our shareholder outreach, the Compensation Committee believes our stockholders strongly support our approach to NEO and senior management compensation.

30


STOCKHOLDER OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

Recognizing that stockholders are the owners of Align, we maintain outreach programs that are open dialogues in which we actively encourage and welcome feedback from stockholders regarding all aspects of our business, including the outreach program itself. Our engagement is year round and can include members of our Board and various members of senior management, including our CEO, CFO, and other organizational leaders from select internal organizations depending on the circumstances, including Legal, Human Resources, Operations, Sales and Marketing, Product Development and Investor Relations. In return, we use every element of the program to provide stockholders with honest, candid information on the most pressing and relevant issues we face, sharing the rationale for our corporate strategy and the impact of Board oversight in key areas.

In 2020, we were forced to adapt our engagement strategy as a result of travel and gathering restrictions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, during the year we reached out to stockholders representing more than 71% of our shares outstanding and were successful speaking with stockholders representing over 23% of our shareholders. In addition to virtually attending numerous investment analyst-sponsored industry conferences, we hosted a webcast Investor Day in November which drew more than 600 viewers from around the globe.

Input from stockholders, analysts and customers is shared internally, including with our Board, to be used in future strategic, operational, compensation and governance decisions, as appropriate. The feedback from stockholders with whom we spoke in 2020 was universally positive. Once again, they appreciated the opportunity (through our outreach) to furnish input on compensation, governance and related matters of importance to them. Common themes expressed by the stockholders were gratitude for management's candor regarding the impacts of the pandemic and our efforts to help our employees, customers and suppliers stay safe while mitigating and thereafter recovering from the significant business impacts of shutdowns and closures. Additional topics raised during our outreach included board and CEO succession planning and disclosure of environmental, social and governance ("ESG") related matters. Finally, stockholders expressed general satisfaction with the 2019 senior management compensation program; making limited suggestions on ways to better measure long-term overall corporate performance.
Meaningful Compensation and Governance Changes in Response to Stockholder Feedback
In response to the feedback from our stockholders in recent years, the Board and Compensation Committee have overseen expanded disclosures on our website and in our securities filings including, most recently, our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2021, and in this proxy statement, adopted new policies and practices designed to increase transparency and respond to all areas of significant stockholder feedback, and have commenced efforts to implement additional stockholder suggestions in the future.

Compensation Related Matters
What We Have Heard From StockholdersHow We Have Responded
Stockholders prefer that the Compensation Committee avoid large one-time equity awards, regardless of the size, design or purpose of the awards.The Compensation Committee committed to avoid large future one-time equity awards similar to the award granted to our CEO in 2018 except under extraordinary circumstances and only following stockholder outreach.
Increase proxy transparency with respect to the performance elements and goal setting of the annual compensation program.We continue to expand discussion of the setting and determination of performance targets for the annual compensation program, including with regard to MSUs and, in 2020, the mid-year reassessment of our annual cash incentive plan, both of which are entirely performance-based.
31



Non-Compensation Related Matters
What We Have Heard From StockholdersHow We Have Responded
Stockholders recommended we increase stockholder outreach and routinely work to build proactive relationships with stockholders throughout the year.We expanded our outreach program with more virtual meetings and an in-depth Investor Day with presentations from most members of senior management regarding the current state of our business and future expectations.
Stockholders requested interest in additional disclosures regarding our ESG policies and practices.We continue to expand our ESG disclosures on our website and within this proxy statement.

In 2020, we created a Corporate Social Responsibility ("CSR") organization, appointed a full-time dedicated Senior Director of CSR (later promoted to Vice President), established a CSR Committee, and established the pillars of our comprehensive CSR program philosophy.
Stockholders discussed Board governance topics including the following:

• Board Tenure & Board Succession












• CEO Succession Planning Disclosure
We have addressed these concerns as follows:

• We engaged a third-party consultant to assist in the design and implementation of a Board succession program.

• The Nominating and Governance Committee has enhanced our director onboarding and continuing education programs to support our existing directors and to facilitate future directors.

• Each December, the Board conducts an executive succession planning summary with the assistance and input of management, where appropriate, including with regard to all Senior Vice Presidents and the CEO.


• Our Board and Nominating and Governance Committee are actively engaged with a third-party consultant designing and implementing a succession program for our senior management team.

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Core Objectives

The objective of our executivesenior management compensation program is to encourage managementour corporate leaders to achieve our financial and strategic objectives and createobjectives; thereby creating value for our stockholders. We remain committed to our longstanding compensation philosophy which incorporates the following principles:

Offer competitive compensation. We seek to provide competitive compensation opportunities to attract, retain and incent superior talent.

Reward performance. A significant portion of the total target compensation forof our NEOs is tied to the achievement of financial and strategic objectives. We believe that this supports our pay-for-performance philosophy by directly and substantially linking rewards to the achievement of measurable financial targets and a shared set of critical strategic priorities. By also rewarding individual performance, we seek to foster a meritocracy.recognize outstanding individual contributions.

Link the interests of our executivessenior management with those of our stockholders. A significant portion of total target compensation for our NEOs is tied to the achievement of financial and strategic objectives and is in the form of long-term equity-based compensation. This structure is designed to focus decision-making and behavior on goals that are consistent with Align’sour overall strategy.



4032


How We Implement and Manage our Executive Compensation Programs
The table below specifies the responsible parties and their respective roles in the determination of the compensation fordetermining our NEOs:NEOs' compensation:
Responsible PartyRoles and Responsibilities
Compensation CommitteeSets Align'sour overall compensation philosophy, which is reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.reviews and approves
Reviews and approves our compensation programs; designs and monitors the execution of these programs.programs
Reviews and approves all cash basedcash-based compensation arrangements for our executive officerssenior management (other than our CEO).
Reviews and recommends to our Board of Directors all cash basedcash-based compensation arrangements for our CEO.CEO
No member of the Compensation Committee is a former or current officer of Align or any of its subsidiaries. No executive officermember of Alignsenior management serves as a member of the Board or compensation committeeCompensation Committee of any entity that has one or more executive officersmembers of senior management serving on Align'sour Board or Compensation Committee.Committee
Consultant to the Compensation Committee (Compensia, Inc. an independent executive compensation consulting firm retained directly by the Compensation Committee to assist it in performing its responsibilities.)
Compensia attends meetings of the Compensation Committee and communicates outside of meetings with its members and management with respect to the design and assessment of compensation packages for our executive officers.senior management. In 2015,2020, Compensia provided the following services below on behalf of the Committee:
Analyzed whether the compensation packages of our executive officerssenior management were consistent with our compensation philosophy and competitive within the market relative to our peer companies.companies
Assisted in defining the appropriate peer group of comparable companies.companies
Assisted in the design of our compensation programs for executivessenior management and boardBoard members, including discussing evolving compensation trends.trends
Reviewed the effectiveness of our compensation programs.programs
Provided advice on stock ownership guidelines for executive officerssenior management and directors.directors
Compiled and provided market data to assist in setting our compensation philosophy, plan parameters and measures.measures
Conducted a comprehensive review of Board compensation paid to the Board and provided recommendations to the Compensation Committee and the Board regarding director pay structure.structure
Provided updates on NASDAQ listing standards, Say-on-Pay results, and Dodd-Frank regulatory developments.developments
In addition, the Compensation Committee conducted a formal review of Compensia’s independence and is satisfied with the qualifications, performance and independence of Compensia. Compensia performed no other work for the Company.
Align
Executive OfficersSenior Management (Assisted by Company Staff)

Management's role is to advise the Compensation Committee regarding the alignment and weighting of our performance measures under our annual cash incentive awards with our overall strategy, the impact of the design of our equity incentive awards on our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly talented executives and the competitiveness of our compensation program. Our CEO plays a significant role in setting the compensation for other NEOs. The CEO conducts performance reviews for the other NEOs and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the other NEOs’NEOs' compensation. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to accept, reject, or modify the CEO's recommendations. Any executive officer who participates in Compensation Committee meetingsThe CEO leaves the meetings during discussions and deliberations of individual compensation actions affecting them personally and during the Compensation Committee’s executive sessions.him personally. Ultimately all decisions regarding executivesenior management compensation are made by the Compensation Committee or in the case of CEOour CEO's cash compensation, the full Board upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee.
How We Determine Compensation
Competitive Positioning.Within the overall framework of the objectives and principles discussed above, the Compensation Committee exercises its judgment in making executivesenior management compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee takes into consideration the unique roles played by each executive officermember of senior management and seeks to individually tailor their compensation to align their pay based on the factors below:

market comparison data (peer group data and survey data);
subjective elements, such as:
the scope of the executive’sindividual's role;

the individual's:
41
33


the executive’s:experience;
experience;qualifications;
qualifications;
skills; and
performance during the fiscal year (see discussion below on "Role of Individual Performance”Performance");
internal equity; and
Align’sour operational and financial performance.

After reviewing these various competitive positioning factors (none of which is determinative), the Compensation Committee relies upon the judgment of its members and makesto make appropriate adjustments to an executive’s compensation.the compensation of senior management to meet our corporate objectives.

The Use of Market Comparison Data.In connection with the Compensation Committee’sCommittee's continuing assessment of the competitiveness of Align’s executivesenior management's pay levels and practices relative to its peers, the Compensation Committee considers compensation data gathered from: (i) compensation data from a selected peer group of companies, and (ii) published surveys with data from a broader mix of technology and life science companies.

Peer Group

The Compensation Committee reviews the Company’sour peer group at least annually and makes adjustments to its compositions,composition, taking into account changes in both the Company’sour business and the businesses of the companies in the peer group. For compensation decisions that were made inapplicable to fiscal 2015,year 2020, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Compensia, selected thereviewed and approved a peer group that consists entirely of medical device and technology product companies, which are the industries from which we primarily recruit executive talent. The peer group was chosen based on the following selection criteria:

Industry-medical device companies and software as a servicemedical technology companies, (SaaS). We believe thatwhich are the SaaS industry is a relevant industry for market comparison purposes due to the integral role that software systems and software development has in our products and services;industries from which we primarily recruit executive talent;

Market Capitalization-companies with a market capitalization of between approximately $1.4$5.9 billion and $13.0$94.8 billion based upon the companies’ trading ranges at the time of selection;selection which approximated 0.25 to 4.0 times our market capitalization at that time; and

Revenue-companies with revenue of between approximately $200$695.0 million to $2.3$6.2 billion based upon the last four quarters of revenue at the time of selection.selection which approximated 0.3 to 3.0 times our rolling four quarters of revenues at that time.

Primarily as a result of our market capitalization growth, the following two companies from our 2019 peer group were removed for 2020 as they no longer met the selection criteria: Globus Medical and Integra LifeSciences Holdings. The Compensation Committee elected to retain the other eighteen medical device companies from the 2019 peer group and added two new companies for 2020, each of which satisfied the primary selection criteria detailed above. At the time of selection of the peer groupCompensation Committee's assessment in the third quarter of 2014, Align's rolling four quarters of revenue was approximately $687 million and its market capitalization was approximately $4.3 billion. The2019, we compared to the 2020 peer group as follows:

Revenue ($B)Market Capitalization ($B)Market Capitalization as a Multiple of Revenue
Peer Group 50th Percentile$2.7$13.96.0x
Align$2.1$23.711.4x
Percentile Rank20%78%85%

34


Based on this analysis, the Compensation Committee determined that the following table includes the companies in our peer group:
group constituted an appropriate comparative reference for determining senior management compensation for fiscal year 2020:
Software-as-a ServiceABIOMEDMedical DeviceIntuitive Surgical
ANSYSAgilent TechnologiesMasimo
Bio-Rad Laboratories*
athenahealthBruker*Mettler-Toledo
CommVaultBio-TechneCepheid*PerkinElmer
Concur TechnologiesDentsply SironaResmed
DexComTeleflex
Edwards LifesciencesThe Cooper Companies
InformaticaHologicGenomic Health
j2 GlobalHaemonetics
Medidata Solutions*Illumina
MicroStrategyIntegra LifeSciences
NetSuiteInsulet
Quality SystemsMasimo
Rackspace HostingNuVasive
ServiceNowResmed
TIBCO SoftwareSirona DentalVarian Medical Systems
IDEXX LabsThoratecWaters
IlluminaVolcanoZimmer Biomet Holdings*
*Indicates new additions to the peer group. In addition, Quality Systems, Genomic Health, Masimo and Volcano were removed from our peer group because they no longer met the market capitalization selection criteria.
*Indicates new additions to the peer group

Reference Peers
42

TableIn 2020, the Compensation Committee also considered the compensation data of Contentsother companies as reference peers, which are companies identified by management as key business or labor market comparators. The compensation data of these companies was used for informational purposes only and were not used in setting senior management compensation levels because the financial profiles of these companies are outside the peer group development parameters.


Survey Data

When peer data is not available, the Compensation Committee reviews various pay surveys, including the Radford Technology Survey. In addition, the Compensation Committee may review the data separately to understand pay differences, if any, by industry or business segment and to assess whether any changes in pay data from year to year reflect true market trends.
Role of Competitive Data and the Compensation Committee’sCommittee's Discretion
The Compensation Committee uses the following percentiles of peer group and survey data as a reference point for assessing appropriate base salary, target total cash compensation and equity compensation for our executive officers:
Element of CompensationTarget Percentile
Base salary
50th percentile
Target total cash compensation
65th to 75thpercentile
Equity compensation
50th to 75thpercentile

While we believe that comparisons to market data are a useful, tool, we dothe Compensation Committee does not believe that it is appropriate to establish executivesenior management compensation levels based solely on a comparison to market data. Due to the variations between companies reporting and the roles for which compensation for these companies is ultimately disclosed, directly comparable information is not available from each peer group company with respect to each of our named executive officers.NEOs. In considering market compensation data, the Compensation Committee recognizes that executivessenior management roles at different companies can playvary significantly, different roles, with different responsibilities and scopes of work, even though they may hold similar titles or nominal positions. The Compensation Committee therefore uses the market data only as a reference point and incorporates flexibility into our compensation programs and in the assessment process to respond to and adjust for the evolving business environment and other subjective elements described in the competitive positioning factors above. After reviewing these various factors, the Compensation Committee relies upon the judgment of its members and makes adjustments to an executive’sadjust senior management compensation below or above these percentile ranges.ranges as it deems appropriate.

Role of Company Performance. The Compensation Committee believes that senior management should be rewarded based on their success as a team. Consistent with this belief, the achievement of shared financial and critical strategic goals, which we describe below under “Annual Cash Incentive Compensation” is the primary factor in determining the amount of cash incentive payments.

Role of Individual PerformancePerformance. . Although the Compensation Committee believes that the largest portion of the total target compensation of each executive’s total compensationmember of senior management should be based on our executive officers’their success as a team and thus based on achievement
35


of shared financial and critical strategic goals, it also believes that there should be some ability to reward individual contributions. To evaluate individual performance, we set annual individual goals are setfor each year for the executive officers.member of senior management. These include shared financial and strategic objectives as well as objectives that are directly related to each executive officer’sindividual's specific business function. Except with respect to his own performance, this assessment is based on our CEO’sCEO's recommendation to the Compensation Committee on how well the executivean individual performed hisher or herhis job, and such assessment is largely (although not exclusively) qualitative, not quantitative, in nature. There is no specific weight given to any one individual goal or objective. This subjective evaluation of the impact of the individual contributions on actual compensation is not a formula based process resulting in a quantifiable amount of impact, but rather involves the exercise of discretion and judgment. This enables the Compensation Committee to differentiate among executivesindividuals and emphasize the link between personal performance and compensation.
Role of Company Performance. The Compensation Committee believes that our executives should be rewarded based on their success as a team. Consistent with this belief, the achievement of shared financial and critical strategic goals, which we describe below under “Annual Cash Incentive Compensation” is the primary factor in determining the amount of cash incentive payments.
The Use of Tally Sheets.The Compensation Committee uses tally sheets to understand thesenior management total annual compensation of the executive officers, and to provide perspective on the executive’s wealth accumulation from our compensation programs. Compensation previously paid to the executive officers,each individual, including amounts realized under prior equity-based compensation awards, did not affect the Compensation Committee’sCommittee's compensation decisions for 2015.2020. The Compensation Committee believes that compensation should reflect the executive’san individual's performance and the market value of hisher or herhis services and does not want to create a disincentive for exceptional performance.
The Principal Components of Senior Management Compensation of our Executive Officers
The principal components of each executive officer’sthe target total compensation package at Alignof each member of senior management are:
base salary;
annual cash incentive awards; and
long-term equity-based incentive grants;grants.
In determining the mix of compensation among these elements, the Compensation Committee does not assign specific ratios. Instead, the Compensation Committee typically structures compensation so that a significant portion of the target total direct compensation is "at-risk" or performance-based, with the actual value realized subject to the achievement of short-term or long-term corporate and financial performance goals. In 2020, approximately 92% of our CEO's target total direct compensation was structured as "at-risk" performance-based. The "at-risk" performance-based compensation of our other NEOs was approximately 84% of their target total direct compensation. By linking a significant portion of the compensation payable to each member of senior management to performance, the Compensation Committee emphasized incentive-based variable pay, which is consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy and creates a strong alignment with long-term stockholder value. In reviewing the equity portfolio for our NEOs for 2020 annual focal awards, the Compensation Committee determined that a mix of 67% MSUs and 33% RSUs closely aligned all of our NEOs' compensation with the interests of our stockholders.
severanceceo20201a.jpg
* Target Total Direct Compensation reflects annual base salary, annual cash incentive opportunity and changethe grant date fair value of control arrangements.equity awards.

43



Base Salary

Base salary is intended to provide a fixed, baseline level of compensation that is not contingent upon Align’sour performance. Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, base salaries generally represent a modest proportion of the total compensation opportunity for our executive officers.senior management. In January 2015,2020, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of our NEOs, comparing these salaries to the base salary levels at theof companies in our peer group, as well as considering the roles and responsibilities and potential performance of the NEOs and their positioning for other elements of their compensation. After this review, the Compensation Committee made the adjustments to base salary set forth in the table below. Mr. Relic’s 15% increase
36


Name2019 Base Salary2020 Base SalaryPercentage Increase
Joseph M. Hogan$1,130,000 $1,175,000 4.0%
John F. Morici$500,000 $540,000 8.0%
Simon Beard$440,000 $520,000 18.2%
Julie Tay(1)
$495,000 $520,000 5.1%
Raj Pudipeddi$465,000 $490,000 5.4%
(1) Ms. Tay's annual base salary is payable in Singapore dollars. Values in the table are converted into U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate in effect as of each pay date. As of December 31, 2020, as a result of fluctuations in exchange rates, Ms. Tay's actual salary in 2020 was made in connection with his strong individual performance as well as closing a significant gap between his salary and the salary of other members of the executive management team and moving it to more closely approximate the market 50th percentile.$533,157.

Name 2014 Base Salary 2015 Base Salary Percentage Increase over 2014
Joseph M. Hogan N/A $950,000 N/A
Thomas M. Prescott $650,000 $675,000 3.8%
David L. White $407,000 $424,000 4.2%
Raphael S. Pascaud $350,000 $369,000 5.4%
Zelko Relic $310,000 $358,000 15%
Roger E. George $354,000 $370,000 4.5%

Mr. Hogan’sThe base salary of $950,000 was basedeach NEO reflects our significant growth and the role of each NEO in that achievement. For Mr. Beard, his increase is primarily a reflection of his increased responsibilities as Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Americas which required him to relocate to the United States in September 2019 on a reviewthree year employment assignment away from his family. Ms. Tay's increase includes the impact of peerexchange rates between her local currency, the Singapore dollar, and our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. In the case of Mr. Hogan, his base salary reflects his position as our most senior executive officer, his vigorous leadership since joining Align as our CEO, compensation, as well as pay packages for recently hired CEOs as discussed above under “CEO Transition”.our strong performance during his tenure, and recognition of the salary that someone with his proven ability and track record could command in the competitive market.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

Annual Cash Incentive Plan. Align usesWe use a cash incentive compensation plan to reward senior management, including all of our NEOs, for achieving and surpassing pre-established financial goals. In December 2019, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of our Annual Cash Incentive Award plan ("Bonus Plan"). Based on its review, the Compensation Committee determined that the pool of funds available to pay out awards to our senior management for performance in 2020 would continue to be based on the extent to which we met or exceeded predetermined goals under selected financial metrics. Consistent with prior years, the Compensation Committee selected two financial metrics, weighted as identified below, for purposes of funding the overall Bonus Plan pool for 2020:

Revenue - 60%
Operating Income - 40%
Considered in the aggregate, the Compensation Committee believes these metrics are strong indicators of our overall performance and our ability to a lesser extentcreate stockholder value. These measures balance propelling growth while encouraging efficiency and are aligned with our strategic priorities of international expansion, GP adoption, patient demand and conversion and orthodontist utilization. In determining actual bonuses to be awarded to each member of senior management, bonus amounts are adjusted, either up or down, based on her or his overall performance and contribution to the achievement of key strategic measures, which are expected to increase stockholder value. All of our NEOs participated in the executive bonus plan. Bonus determinations for fiscal 2015 performance were calculated using the following formula:goals.




The Individual and Company Multipliers are each derived based on performance and are equally weighted.

chart3a061.jpg
Target Bonus Percentage.The target award opportunity is the amount of cash incentive compensation that our NEOseach member of senior management could expect to earn if Align’swe achieved our financial and strategic performance goals for the year are achieved. Each executive officer is assigned a target award opportunity of 60% of his or her base salary, except for Mr. Hogan who is assigned a target award opportunity of 150% of his base salary. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Prescott’s target award opportunity was 100% of his base salary.year. The incentive targets for members of the NEOssenior management were set by the Compensation Committee based on the scope and significance of their roles as theour leaders, of Align, with theour CEO receiving the highest target due to his greater responsibilities. The target awards as a percent of base salary for each member of senior management (other than our CEO) was 70% of base salary in 2020, consistent with 2019. Mr. Hogan's 2020 target award opportunity also remained unchanged at 150% of his base salary. In addition, in order to appropriately encourage and reward a range of acceptable performance and contributions in fiscal year 2020, our awards arewere structured so that the actual payout under an executive officer’s award canto a member of senior management could be as low as 0% of target or up to a maximum award of 240% of target.

37


As a result of the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business in the first half of 2020, our Compensation Committee performed a mid-year review and reassessment of our 2020 Bonus Plan performance goals. Following this review and reassessment, the Compensation Committee determined not to redesign the Bonus Plan, but instead to simply reset the original annual performance targets under both of the financial metrics to focus solely on second half of 2020 recovery efforts based on revised, mid-year internal estimates. In so doing, the Compensation Committee also reduced by half the potential target payout amounts, from 100% to 50%, and reduced the maximum amount payable under the Bonus Plan to members of senior management from 240% to 120% of their bonus award opportunity. Had the Compensation Committee not made this mid-year revision, there would have been no payments to senior management under the full-year Bonus Plan. Please see the further discussion below under "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan" for a more detailed discussion of the mid-year adjustments to our 2020 Bonus Plan performance goals.

Individual Multiplier.Factor. The Individual MultiplierFactor reflects each executive’s individual performance and is determined at the Compensation Committee’s discretion based on the recommendationCommittee's assessment of the CEO. Thisspecific performance appraisal process is largely subjective, with much discretion exercised by our CEO andof each member of senior management in light of the Committee.achievement of her or his individual goals. There is no specific weight given to any one individual goal or performance criterion. The Compensation Committee considers each executive officer’s performance in lightthe views of that individual’s achievement of his or her individual goals. The assessment is based on our CEO and Compensation Committee’s determinations regarding how well the executiveeach performed hisher or herhis job, and such assessment is qualitative, not quantitative, in nature. The CEO does not provide input to the Compensation Committee onregarding his own performance. Individual performance that meets expectations yields a 100% multiplier, with a maximum rating of 200%.multiplier.

44



Company Multiplier.The Company Multiplier is the same for all executive officers. The Company Multipliermembers of senior management. It is determined based on pre-established goals under selected financial targets. The Compensation Committee reviewed the structure of the Bonus Plan and key company strategic objectives. While managementselected two financial metrics that focused on (1) growth and (2) profitability for purposes of funding the overall pool. Management typically recommends the performance targets for bonus pool funding the Bonus Pool based on our Annual Operating Plan,annual operating plan as well as reference to historical performance and revenue and operating profit growth rates at select comparable medical device companies, but the targets are ultimately approved by the Compensation Committee and reviewed by the BoardBoard. For 2020, the Compensation Committee originally established 100% Bonus Pool funding based on revenue of Directors. At$2,862.0 million and operating income of $636.0 million or 22.2% of revenues. These targets were later reset (and the beginningbonus opportunity reduced by 50%) to focus solely on performance objectives for the second half of 2015,2020 of $1,451.0 million and $298.0 million for revenue and operating income, respectively, or 20.5% of revenues. Please see the Committee reviewed the structurediscussion below under "Impact of the executive bonus plan and determined that it was appropriateCOVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan" for a further discussion of the mid-year adjustments to continue to focus on (1) growth, (2) profitability, and (3) the achievement of critical strategic priorities.our 2020 Bonus Plan performance goals.

The following table below shows the performance metrics used in 20152020 and our level of performance with respect to these metrics:metrics.
Measure/Weight/
Calculates
Why do we use this measure?
Original Target (2020)
(in millions)
Achievement (2020)
(in millions) (1)
Revised Target
(2H 2020)
(in millions)
Achievement (2H 2020)
(in millions) (1)
Level of Achievement vs Revised Target(2H 2020) Impact on
Company
Multiplier
Revenues (1) (2) (3) (60%)
Improvement in this measure aligns with our overall growth strategy$2,862$2,472$1,343$1,564116.4%304%
Operating income (1) (2) (3) (40%)
Directly links incentive payments to profitability and provides incentives to employees (including management) to share in our profitability. Because profitability encompasses both revenue and expense management, the Compensation Committee believes this measure encourages a balanced, holistic approach to managing our business. The Compensation Committee considers operating profit before taxes because management cannot predict or directly affect our taxes or our tax rate.$636$387$262$387147.7%447%
COMPANY MULTIPLIER:120%
Measure/Weight/
Calculated
 Why do we use this measure? 
Target
(in millions)
 
Achievement
(in millions)
 Level of Achievement of Target 
Impact on
Company
Multiplier
             
Revenue (1)(2) (40%)
 Improvement in this measure aligns with our overall growth strategy. $881.6 $880.4 99.9%  39.8% 
             
Adjusted Non-GAAP Operating income  (1) (2) (30%)
 Directly links incentive payments to Company profitability and we want our employees (including our executives) to share in our profitability. Because profitability encompasses both revenue and expense management, the Compensation Committee believes this measure encourages a balanced, holistic approach by our executives to manage our business. The Compensation Committee considers operating profit before taxes because our executives cannot predict or directly affect our taxes or our tax rate. $264.6 $268.2 101.4%  33.1% 
Roadmap Elements (30%)

Delivering key elements of Company roadmap projects or initiatives, including meeting delivery dates and feature set requirements. (4)
 
Critical to our achievement of our multi-year strategic corporate priorities, specifically, increased adoption and frequency of use by our customers, the orthodontist and general practitioner dentist and increased consumer demand. (3)
 100%  92.4%  92.4%  27.7% 
COMPANY MULTIPLIER:       100.6% 


(1)(1)During the second half of 2020, revenue and operating income achievement were adjusted downwards by $5.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The adjustments were due to a 0.8% benefit in foreign exchange compared to the assumptions made in our revised second half operating plan. On a full year basis there would not have been a similar adjustment as the impact from foreign exchange was below the minimum threshold required for adjustment. The Compensation Committee had previously approved adjustments (upwards or downwards) to our full-year 2020 Bonus Plan results in the event the impact of foreign exchange was above 4.7 percentage points. No other adjustments were made to either the target or the level of achievement.
The threshold performance and the level of performance at which the funding for that particular financial performance measure will be capped as follows:

(2)The target performance and the level of performance at which the funding for that particular financial performance measure will be capped as follows:
A rating of zero if achievement is below 90%. of target. Company performance below target automatically reduces only the payout related to that goal, not the other goals,goal, as we want executivessenior management to have the same incentive to achieve other financial goals as well as their individual performance goals even if our performance tracks below the target during the course of the year;
38


A rating ranging from 60%90% to 100% if achievement meets or exceeds the minimum performance level but does not achieve the target performance level; and

A rating of 101% to 200%and above if achievement meets or exceeds the target performance level. Each individual financial metric is uncapped; however, once the Company Multiplier reaches 240% in the aggregate, which was reduced to 120% based on the Compensation Committee's mid-year review and reassessment of the performance goals as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, the adjusted the Bonus Pool is fully funded. Therefore, in the aggregate, as originally approved the Bonus Pool for senior management could not exceed 240% funding, which was later reduced to 120%. Please see the discussion below under "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan" for a further discussion of the mid-year adjustments to our 2020 Bonus Plan performance goals.

(2)
(3)The Compensation Committee has the discretion to exclude the following items from Revenues and Operating Income:
(a)significant and/or extraordinary items that are not indicative of our core operating performance that are separately stated on our financial statements;
(b)items identified as non-GAAP in our quarterly earnings announcements; and
(c)other discrete items as necessary that may result in unintended gain or loss under the bonus plan.

Adjusted Non-GAAP Operating Income was adjusted to exclude stock based compensation expense. The Compensation Committee also has the discretion to exclude the following items from Revenue and Operating Income:


45


(a)significant and/or extraordinary items that are not indicative of our core operating performance that are separately stated on our financial statements;

(b)items identified as non-GAAP in the Company’s quarterly earnings announcements; and

(c)other discrete items as necessary that may result in unintended gain or loss under the bonus plan.
The Compensation Committee believes that the items listed in (a) through (c) above are not indicative of our core operating performance. Appendix AThe only adjustment made to this proxy statement includes a reconciliation of adjusted Non-GAAP operating income and Revenue achievement to the most comparable GAAP measures.our 2020 bonus plan results is described in note (1) above.
(3)

Management believes, and the Committee concurs, that the specific strategic initiatives and performance goals established for each of these strategic priorities represent confidential business information, the disclosure of which would result in meaningful competitive harm.
(4)
For each strategic performance measure, a rating ranging from 0% to 150% based on relative achievement of the particular measure.

The Compensation Committee believes that the financial metrics performance objectives originally established for the financial and key strategic objectives representrepresented meaningful improvements over 2019 annual performance for the organization and therefore, are reasonably difficult to attain which isthat the revised objectives would incentivize a swift and significant rebound after the unanticipated COVID-19-related material declines in line with our pay-for-performance philosophy.the first half of 2020. Finally, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to apply judgment in the final determination of cash incentive awards and can adjust actual results (up or down) to reflect the impact of certain extraordinary items or events to more accurately reflect the overall performance of the management team.

In addition, the Board of Directors retains authority to pay additional discretionary bonuses outside the executive bonus planBonus Plan if warranted by performance not measured under the plan. In 2015,2020, neither the Board nor the Compensation Committee did not authorizeauthorized any such discretionary bonus payments outsideto our NEOs.

Impact of the executive bonus planCOVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected our business and the business of our customers throughout fiscal year 2020. Beginning in the first quarter and continuing into the second quarter, we experienced a rapid and unanticipated downturn in sales initially in Asia, particularly in China. As the virus spread beyond China, into Europe and thereafter the Americas in early March, sales quickly decelerated as the practices of many of our customers were severely curtailed or completely closed. By mid-March 2020, most governments in EMEA and North America had begun to our NEOs, except with respect to Mr. Hogan who received a one-time cash bonus payment in connection with commencing employmentclose or already had closed non-essential businesses and initiated stay at home orders, with the Company.vast majority of dental practices completely shut down or severely restricting patient visits. As a result, our sales fell sharply and rapidly.

As the COVID-19 pandemic response evolved during the second quarter of 2020, dental practices began to reopen such that by the end of the second quarter practices across every region had largely reopened and were beginning to again see patients, although at varying capacities and the vast majority below pre-pandemic levels of operations. Despite the re-openings, our key financial metrics for the first half of 2020 materially trailed our results for the first half of 2019. For the six months ended June 30, 2020, we recorded net revenues of $903.3 million, a decrease of 21.4%compared to the same period in 2019.

As reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, we anticipated that, at least in the short term, our business could continue to be particularly susceptible to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We believed that all or a material portion of our products could be viewed as discretionary purchases and therefore more susceptible to any global or regional recession resulting from efforts to prevent or delay the spread of the virus. Moreover, we expected that efforts to slow or prevent a recurrence of the spread of the virus were likely to continue causing disruptions and uncertainties in the markets and require significant costs and efforts on the part of our customers to ensure the health and safety of their patients resulting in curtailed operations by our customers and decreased patient visits for an indeterminate period of time. The uncertain scope and duration of the pandemic, and the uncertain timing of the global recovery and economic normalization, was so unprecedented and made internal forecasting so difficult that we discontinued providing quarterly financial guidance.

Due to the impact caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on our business performance and the uncertainties expected to continue, including lower than expected sales of our Invisalign clear aligners and iTero intraoral scanners, our Compensation Committee performed a mid-year review and reassessment of our 2020 Bonus Plan performance goals to determine whether the original metrics and performance goals continued to appropriately incentivize employees in light of revised 2020 financial performance estimates. The result of this review and reassessment being the Compensation Committee's decision to reset our
39


performance targets to the second half of 2020. In addition,setting the revised targets, the Compensation Committee utilized the same methodologies it used when setting the original 2020 annual performance goals other than restricting the performance targets to the six month period of the second half of 2020. The Compensation Committee also reduced the potential target payout amounts by 50% and similarly reduced the maximum amount payable to members of senior management by half, from 240% to 120%.

In revising the financial metric targets and potential bonus awards, the Compensation Committee determined that the revised goals were reasonable and justifiable based on several factors, including the following:

although the performance targets were revised for employees and senior management, the revised targets for senior management were higher than those of other employees and therefore required higher achievements for senior management;
rebounding from the material declines in connectionthe first half of 2020 to achieve strong financial performance amidst the significant uncertainties in the broader macroeconomic and societal environments caused by the COVID-19 pandemic should be appropriately encouraged;
the changes to the performance targets were due to global factors outside the control of senior management and were implemented to motivate and incentivize them to quickly recover from an unprecedented and evolving global health crisis; and
the revised goals were set at levels that, if met, would likely increase shareholder value and the Company's valuation.

The Compensation Committee believes the mid-year goal and performance achievement revisions were necessary and appropriate to incentivize and align the interests of senior management with Mr. Prescott’s retirement, he receivedtwo principal drivers of shareholder value and consistent with our internal business plan and our overall compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee furthermore believed that this approach better incented senior management and aligned their interests with those of the shareholders than alternatives. For instance, the Compensation Committee could have chosen to leave the goals unchanged and make discretionary awards at the end of 2020. The Compensation could have also granted one-time awards but it did not. The Company also did not implement any salary reductions, employment furloughs or layoffs in a $25,000 cash payment intendedshort-term effort to assist with post-termination medical care costs (in lieuimprove operating income.

Without the mid-year adjustments, there would have been no payouts under the Bonus Plan based on our actual results for 2020 despite our strong recovery in the second half. Under the revised performance goals, the 2020 payouts under the Bonus Plan to senior management were 120% of any reimbursementtheir target award opportunity. The Compensation Committee believes that our strong operating results and stock performance in 2020 validate the soundness of COBRA premiums).their decision-making as reflected in the summary and discussion above under the heading "Executive Summary" and subheading "2020 Business Highlights," which include our one-year and three-year TSR of 91.5% and 140.5%, respectively.

For 2021, the Compensation Committee has once again selected the same financial metrics (i.e., revenue and operating income) and set annual targets similar to the approach it has used in previous years.

Awards to the NEOs. The Compensation Committee awarded the cash incentive awards set forth below to the NEOs for 20152020 performance. The amounts payable to the NEOs were confirmed by the Compensation Committee after review of our 2020 annual and second half results on January 26, 2021 and the payments were made to our U.S. based NEOs in accordance with our normal payroll practices on February 5, 2021 and on February 19, 2021 for Ms. Tay who is based in Singapore. These awards are also set forth below in the Summary Compensation Table on page 51 under the heading “Non-Equity"Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”Compensation." Consistent with our philosophy of linking pay to performance and the reduction in the maximum payout potential, our NEOs received cash payouts of 120% of target.
NameTarget Incentive Award (as % of Base Salary)Target Incentive AwardCompany MultiplierIndividual MultiplierActual Incentive AwardActual Award as % of Target
Joseph M. Hogan150%$1,762,500 120%100%$2,115,000 120%
John F. Morici70%$378,000 120%100%$453,600 120%
Simon Beard70%$364,000 120%100%$436,800 120%
Julie Tay (1)
70%$364,000 120%100%$447,000 120%
Raj Pudipeddi70%$343,000 120%100%$411,600 120%
(1) Ms. Tay's annual base salary is payable in Singapore dollars. Values in the Actual Incentive Award column are calculated after conversion of her base salary into U.S. dollars after taking into account fluctuation in the exchange rate as of each executive officer's total cash compensation increasedpay date throughout 2020. Ms. Tay's base pay was initially established at $520,000. As of December 31, 2020, as a result of fluctuations in 2015, reflecting the Company Multiplier having increased from 95%exchange rates, Ms. Tay's actual salary in 2014 to 100.6% in 2015. In addition, the Compensation Committee (with input from our CEO, other than with respect to himself) also performed a full evaluation of the individual performance component for each NEO2020 was $533,157 and determined that each NEO should receive an Individual Performance Multiplier of between 106% to 131%,her Actual Incentive Award is based on their respective contributions to the Company in their respective divisional or functional capacities.this amount.

40
Name Target Incentive Award (as % of Base Salary) 
Target Incentive Award
(in 000s)
 Company Multiplier Individual Multiplier
Actual Incentive Award
(in 000s)
 Actual Award as % of Target
Joseph M. Hogan 150% 
   $831 (1)
 100.6% 115%$960 115.6%
Thomas M. Prescott 100% 
   $281(1)
 100.6% 110%$310 110.6%
David L. White 60% $208 100.6% 105%$268.7 105.6%
Raphael S. Pascaud 60% $238 100.6% 130%$311.3 130.8%
Zelko Relic 60% $215 100.6% 115%$248.5 115.7%
Roger E. George 60% $222 100.6% 110%$245.7 110.7%

(1)
The awards for Mr. Hogan and Mr. Prescott were pro rated based on the number of months they were employed by the Company in 2015.


46


Long-Term, Equity-Based Incentive Awards

We use equity compensation to align our named executive officers’NEOs' interests with those of our stockholders and to attract and retain high-caliber executives through recognition of anticipated future performance. We determine appropriate grant amounts, if any, by reviewing competitive market data, individual performance assessments and business objectives with the Compensation Committee at least annually.
Award TypeRationale for 2015 portfolio
2020 Portfolio
Why RSUs?We believe RSUs reward retention (even in the event of a decline in Align’s share price)the price of our stock) and provide an incentive to grow the value of Align’sour stock. In addition, RSUs enable our executivessenior management to accumulate stock ownership in Align, which reinforces the Company.
alignment of their objectives with those of our stockholders.
Why MSUs?We believe MSUs provide a vehicle that has more consistent value delivery compared to stock options which also aligns the long-term interests of our executive officerssenior management and stockholders by rewarding executivessenior management for Align’s performance measured in relation to other companies over a specified period. The actual number of shares of our common stock issuable under MSUs varies based on over-orover- or under-performance of Align’sour stock price compared to the NASDAQ Composite Index during the three-year performance period. If Align under-performs the NASDAQ Composite Index, the percentage at which the MSUs convert into shares of Alignour stock will be reduced from 100%, at a rate of twothree to one (two-percentage-point(three-percentage-point reduction in units for each percentage point of under-performance), with a minimum percentage of 0%. This means that no shares will vest if Align underperformswe underperform the NASDAQ Composite by 50approximately 33 percentage points. If Align outperformswe outperform the NASDAQ Composite Index, the percentage at which the MSUs convert to shares will be increased from 100%, at a rate of twothree to one (two-percentage-point(three-percentage-point increase in units for each percentage point of over-performance), with a maximum percentage of 150%250%. This means that if Align outperformswe outperform the NASDAQ Composite by 2550 percentage points, the maximum number of shares that will vest is 150%250% of the award amount. For example, if the NASDAQ Composite index increased by 10% over the performance period and our stock price increased by 30% over the performance period, then the number of shares issuable under the MSUs would be 140%160% of target or (130%-110%)*2=140%3=160%.

Award TypeVesting Detail
RSUsTypically vests over four-years with 1/425% vesting annually.
annually
MSUsThree yearThree-year performance period beginning February 2015 and ending February 2018with vesting, in full, part or not at all, at the end of year three

Awards in 2015.2020. ConsistentIn 2020, our Compensation Committee reviewed our MSU program design and concluded that the program design was generally aligned with our ongoing efforts to align pay for performance, we continue to emphasizemarket. For awards made in 2020, the Compensation Committee set the percentage of "performance-based" equity awards granted to our executive officerssenior management at 67%. The Compensation Committee calculated the target values for equity awards to achieve this desired mix using a look back price that are tied directly to performance measured in relation to other companies over a specified period. In 2015, half ofwas based on the value of the equity-based awards30-trading day average closing price of our NEOs were designated as “performance-based.” In making these awards,common stock for the Compensation Committee again consideredperiod ending February 15, 2020. Based on this price per share, the market data, as well as the other competitive positioning factors described above. Under the employment agreement entered into with Mr. Hogan in connection with his appointment as CEO, hetotal desired number of targeted shares was granted a sign-on award consisting of 111,000 restricteddetermined, then split between time-based RSUs 33% and performance-based market stock units and 111,000 market stock units. The RSUs granted to Mr. Hogan vested 25% on December 31, 2015, with an additional 25% vesting on each December 31 thereafter for full vesting on December 31, 2018. The MSUs granted to Mr. Hogan will vest at the end of a three-year performance period which commenced on June 1, 2015.67%.

The table below sets forth the equitytarget value and number of shares awarded to the NEOs forin fiscal 2015:2020:

Name RSUs 
Target MSUs (1)
Joseph M. Hogan 111,000 111,000
Thomas M. Prescott 49,000 49,000
David L. White 11,500 11,500
Raphael S. Pascaud 12,000 12,000
Zelko Relic 12,000 12,000
Roger E. George 10,700 10,700
Name
Target Value
(RSUs)
RSU
(Shares)
Target Value
(MSUs) (1)
Target MSUs (1)
(Shares)
Joseph M. Hogan$2,970,000 10,864 $6,030,000 22,057 
John F. Morici$660,000 2,415 $1,340,000 4,902 
Simon Beard$594,000 2,173 $1,206,000 4,412 
Julie Tay$594,000 2,173 $1,206,000 4,412 
Raj Pudipeddi$594,000 2,173 $1,206,000 4,412 
(1)    The number of MSUs set forth in this column represents the Target Shares; however, the actual number of shares that may be earned, if any, is determined based on the formula set forth in the MSU Agreement up to a maximum of 250% of the amount of the Target Shares.

(1)
The number of MSUs set forth in this column represents the Target Shares; however, the actual number of MSUs to be earned, if any, is determined based on the formula set forth in the Market Stock Unit Agreement up to a maximum of 150% of the amount of the Target Shares.

47


Severance and Change of Control Arrangements

Employment Agreements. Each NEO is eligible to receive benefits under certain conditions in accordance with their respective employment agreement. Each such agreement provides for benefits to the executive officer upon:
a change of control; and
termination without cause or for convenience.

In adopting the change of control provisions in these agreements, the Compensation Committee’sCommittee's primary objective was to ensure that our executivesmembers of senior management have sufficient security such that they are not biased against selling the CompanyAlign in the
41


event a stockholder favorable merger and acquisition transaction is presented to the Company.presented. If Align were towe pursue a change of control transaction beneficial to Alignour stockholders, the Compensation Committee believes that our executive officers’senior management's active support of the transaction through closing would be critical into ensuring the success of such a transaction.

Change of Control Only. Though the cash severance amounts payable to our executivesMessrs. Hogan and Beard and Ms. Tay in connection with a change of control are subject to a “double trigger”"double trigger" (meaning to get paid out the cash portion of their change of control arrangement, first there has to be a change of control and then the executiveindividual must be terminated without cause or for convenience within 12 monthsa specified period of time of such change of control), the Compensation Committee adopted a “single trigger”"single trigger" for all executive officersthese individuals whereby the vesting of equity awards is accelerated by one year immediately upon a change of control.
Previously, our former CEO, had
With respect to Messrs. Morici and Pudipeddi (as well as any other individual who joins Align or is promoted to a “single trigger” pursuant to which 100% of his equity would vest immediately upon a change of control. With the hiring of Mr. Hogan, however,senior management position after September 2016), the Compensation Committee determined to eliminate thiseliminated all single trigger severance and equity acceleration provisions. Rather, severance payments and equity acceleration for these members of 100% of the CEOs equity awards. Rather, Mr. Hogan’s employment agreement contains a single trigger provision equivalentsenior management are subject to the protection given to our other NEOs whereby the vesting of equity awards is accelerated only by one year immediately upon"double trigger" arrangements that require both a change of control.in control plus a qualifying termination event before any cash payments are paid or any equity acceleration occurs.

Termination within 12 Months ofFollowing a Change of Control. In the event the executive iseither Messrs. Hogan or Beard or Ms. Tay are terminated without cause or for convenience within 12 months of a change in control (“double trigger”(18 months in the case of Mr. Hogan) ('double trigger'), 100% of his or herall remaining unvested equity awards are accelerated and a cash severance payment is made. The CEO would receiveMessrs. Morici and Pudipeddi (as well as any individual who joins Align or is promoted to a senior management position after September 2016) receives a cash severance payment and 100% of her or his unvested equity awards wouldwill accelerate in the event she or he is terminated without cause or for convenience within 18 months of the change of control (“("double trigger”)trigger" for both cash payment and equity acceleration).

Termination Unrelated to a Change of Control. For termination without cause or for convenience unrelated to a change of control, the vesting of equity awards held by an NEO (except for the CEO)Ms. Tay and Mr. Beard, is immediately accelerated by one year and a cash severance payment will be made. Our CEO wouldMessrs. Hogan, Morici and Pudipeddi (as well as any individual who joins Align or is promoted to a senior management position after September 2016), receive only receive a cash severance payment (no equity acceleration). if terminated without cause or for convenience unrelated to a change of control.

Death or Disability. In the event Mr. Hogan's employment terminates as a result of his death or disability, he (or his estate) will immediately vest in 100% of all outstanding equity awards.

The cash severance benefits are intended to provide consideration for the employee’ssenior management's service to Align and the expected length of time until subsequent employment is secured. The severance provisions also assist in recruiting executivesmembers of senior management given that executivetheir roles tend to carry higher risks. The amounts that each of our current NEOs would have been entitled to if one of the termination or change of control events mentioned above occurred on December 31, 20152020 are set forth in -PaymentsPotential Payment Upon Termination or Change of Control.”Control” below.

Other Compensation Arrangements

Welfare and Other Employee Benefits. We have establishedmaintain a tax-qualified Section 401(k) retirement plan and a Companycompany match for all U.S. employees, including our executive officers.members of senior management.

In addition, we provide health and welfare benefits to our executive officerssenior management on the same basis as all of our full-time employees in the country in which they are resident. These benefits include medical, dental and vision benefits, medical and dependent care flexible spending accounts, short-term and long-term disability insurance, accidental death, basic life insurance coverage, and our employee stock purchase plan. We design our employee benefits programs to be affordable and competitive in relation to the market, as well as compliant with applicable laws and practices. We adjust our employee benefits programs as needed based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices and the competitive market.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. Mr. Pascaud, who has his primary residence in the United Kingdom,Senior management is provided with a car in accordance with customary local practice as well as a housing allowance. In addition, executive officers are reimbursed for travel by a non-employee companion (eg.(e.g., spouse) to customer events and certain other Companycompany events where appropriate and it is appropriate and in our interest that the interestmember of the Company for the executive tosenior management have a companion join himher or her.him. See "Summary"Summary Compensation Table"Table" below for more information concerning these perquisites. In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual executive officermember of senior management in the performance of hisher or herhis duties, to make

48


our executive officers her or him more efficient and effective, and for recruitment, motivation, or retention purposes. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits will be approved and subject to periodic review by the Compensation Committee.
Changes in 2016
42


Annual Cash Incentive Award.
In March 2016, the Compensation Committee conducted a review of our Annual Cash Incentive Award plan and adopted the following formula for 2016. The pool of available funds to pay out awards to our executive officers will be based on the extent to which the Company meets or exceeds predetermined goals under selected financial metrics. Beginning in 2016, the Compensation Committee discontinued the use of key strategic initiatives as a key metric, believing that successful implementation of key strategic initiatives helped drive revenue growth and ultimately operating income which are measured separately. Consequently, the Compensation Committee selected two financial metrics, weighted as identified below, for purposes of funding the overall pool:
Revenue - 60%
Operating Income - 40%
Considered in the aggregate for 2016, these metrics are strong indicators of our overall performance and our ability to create stockholder value. These measures were balanced among propelling growth while encouraging efficiency and are aligned with our business strategies. The Committee also determined to eliminate the individual multiplier. In determining actual bonuses to be awarded to each individual NEO, bonus amounts will be adjusted upward or downward based on an executive officer's overall performance and his or her contribution to the achievement of our performance goals.
Corporate Tax Deduction on Compensation in Excess of $1 Million a Year
The Compensation Committee is responsible for addressing issues associated with
Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m)Code, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, generally disallows a deduction for federal tax deductionpurposes to public companiesany publicly traded corporation for compensationany remuneration in excess of $1 million$1,000,000 paid in any taxable year to theits CEO, or any of theCFO and up to three other members of senior management who are among our five most highly compensated officers other than the CFO. Performance-based compensation arrangements may qualify for an exemption fromexecutive officers. Prior to amendment, qualifying “performance-based compensation” was not subject to the deduction limitlimitation if they satisfy variousspecified requirements were met. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the performance-based exception has been repealed with respect to federal income taxes. The new rules generally apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, but do not apply to compensation provided pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 that is not modified in any material respect after that date. While we consider the deductibility of awards in determining compensation payable to senior management, we also reserve the Compensation Committee’s flexibility to provide one or more covered executive officers with the opportunity to earn compensation that is nondeductible under Section 162(m). Although Align considers the impact of this rule when developing and implementing its executive compensation programs, Align believes that factors other than tax deductibility are important in the design of executive compensation programs and that it is important to preserve flexibility in designing such programs. Accordingly, Align has not adopted a policy that all compensation must qualify as deductible under Section 162(m). While the Compensation Committee believes that stock options granted pursuantsuch compensation is appropriate to the Incentive Plan qualify as “performance-based,” other awards permitted by the terms of the Incentive Planattract and certain other amounts paid under Align’s compensation programs (such as salary) may not qualify for exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limitation. For 2015, approximately $1,075,421 of Mr. Hogan’s compensation was not deductible under 162(m). The 2015 compensation for all of the other NEOs was fully deductible under 162(m) as the elements of compensation that are included under Section 162(m) did not exceed $1 million for the “covered employees” described above.retain executive talent.


43





49


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD REPORT
The following is the report of the Compensation Committee of the Board with respect to the year ended December 31, 2015.2020. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement with management. Based on the Compensation Committee’sCommittee's review and discussion with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
George J. Morrow, Chair
David C. NagelAnne M. Myong
Andrea L. Saia
Greg J. Santora

50
44




SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED 2015DECEMBER 31, 2020
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation of (i) our President and Chief Executive Officer, (ii) our Chief Financial Officer, (iii) our former President and Chief Executive Officer, and (iv)(iii) our three next most highly compensated executive officers as ofduring fiscal 2015.2020. Information is provided for 20142019 and 20132018 for each NEO who was also a NEO during those years.
Name and Principal
Position
YearSalary
($)
Bonus ($) (1)
Stock Awards
($) (2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Joseph M. Hogan,20201,171,539 — 11,621,453 2,115,000 614,297 15,522,289 
President and Chief Executive Officer20191,125,769 — 13,901,609 3,220,500 21,261 18,269,139 
20181,069,231 — 36,778,283 3,870,000 40,824 41,758,338 
John F. Morici,2020536,923 — 2,582,931 453,600 9,948 3,583,402 
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Global Finance2019496,923 — 2,780,400 698,000 9,502 3,984,825 
2018457,539 — 2,170,410 718,000 9,234 3,355,183 
Simon Beard,
Senior Vice President, Managing Director, Americas
2020517,692 — 2,324,581 436,800 76,334 3,355,407 
Julie Tay,2020533,157 — 2,324,581 447,000 49,594 3,354,332 
Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Asia Pacific2019501,891 — 2,471,513 661,967 43,172 3,678,543 
Raj Pudipeddi,2020488,077 — 2,324,581 411,600 10,292 3,234,550 
Senior Vice President, and Chief Product, Innovation & Marketing Officer2019402,404 10,000 2,351,716 618,000 98,648 3,480,768 

(1)Amount reflects a one-time signing bonus for Mr. Pudipeddi.
(2)The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculations of these amounts are included in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Stock-Based Compensation and Note 12 - Stockholders' Equity (collectively, "Notes 1 and 12") to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2021. This same method was used for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The grant date fair value of the MSU awards reflected in the Stock Awards column and the tables below is computed based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. This amount is consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost we expect to recognize over the three-year performance period of the award determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718. Refer to Notes 1 and 12 for the assumptions used to value the RSU and MSU awards. The amounts shown in the Stock Awards Column and the tables below exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures and there can be no assurance that the grant date fair value amounts will ever be realized.

NameFiscal Year 2020 RSUsFiscal Year 2020 MSUs
Joe Hogan$2,960,331 $8,661,122 
John Morici$658,063 $1,924,868 
Simon Beard$592,121 $1,732,460 
Julie Tay$592,121 $1,732,460 
Raj Pudipeddi$592,121 $1,732,460 

45


Name and Principal
Position
 Year 
Salary
($)
 Bonus ($) (2) 
Stock
Awards ($)
(3)
 
Option
Awards
($)(3)
 
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 
All Other
Compensation ($)
 Total ($)
Joseph Hogan,
President & Chief Executive Officer (1)
 2015 548,077
 1,500,000
 14,330,100
   960,000
 44,822
 17,382,999
                 
Thomas M. Prescott,
Former President & Chief Executive Officer
(1)
 2015 705,000
 25,000
 5,564,440
 
 310,000
 86,405
 6,690,845
 2014 645,962
 
 7,948,800
 
 585,000
 10,464
 9,190,226
 2013 615,000
 
 4,406,900
 
 900,000
 11,355
 5,933,255
                 
David L. White
Chief Financial Officer
 2015 438,346
 
 1,305,940
 
 268,700
 9,090
 2,022,076
 2014 406,192
 
 1,645,480
 
 241,700
 9,268
 2,302,640
 2013 153,846
 
 3,239,864
 
 159,656
 4,978
 3,558,344
                 
Raphael S. Pascaud 2015 374,317
 
 1,362,720
 
 311,300
 2,298
 2,050,635
Chief Marketing Portfolio and Business Development Officer 2014 334,007
 125,453
 2,371,593
 
 228,600
 43,278
 3,102,931
 2013 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                 
Zelko Relic 2015 366,231
 
 1,362,720
 
 248,500
 9,090
 1,986,541
Vice President, Research and Development               
                
                 
Roger E. George 2015 382,368
 
 1,215,092
 
 245,700
 9,090
 1,852,250
Vice President, Legal & Corporate Affairs 2014 351,699
 
 2,324,904
 
 212,000
 8,667
 2,897,270
 2013 335,183
 
 1,724,193
 
 372,790
 8,367
 2,440,533
Assuming that the highest level of performance conditions is achieved, the aggregate fair value of the MSU awards at the grant date is as follows:

(1)
Name
Mr. Prescott retired as CEO and Mr.Value of Fiscal Year 2020 MSUs Assuming Maximum Performance
Joe Hogan was appointed as CEO in June 2015. As a result, Mr. Hogan's salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation are pro rated based on the number of months he was employed by Align in the capacity of CEO. Pursuant to Mr. Prescott's Transition Agreement, he received seven month's salary continuation through December 31, 2015 for an aggregate of $393,750. His non-equity incentive plan compensation, however, was prorated based on the number of months (5/12) that he acted as our President and CEO.
$15,025,644 
(2)
John Morici
Amounts reflect (i) a one-time signing bonus for Mr. Hogan, (ii) a one-time bonus of $25,000 intended to assist Mr. Prescott with post-termination medical care cost (in lieu of any reimbursement of COBRA premiums); and (iii) a special retention bonus paid to Mr. Pascaud in connection with our previous VP, International, Richard Twomey's departure.
$3,339,365 
(3)
Simon Beard
The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculations of these amounts are included in Note 9 to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2016. This same method was used for years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value amounts will ever be realized.$3,005,565 
Julie Tay$3,005,565 
Raj Pudipeddi$3,005,565 
Total Compensation. TotalMr. Hogan's decrease in total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation table2020 compared to 2019 was primarily due to a lower grant date fair value of his equity awards and decreased significantly from 2014 to 2015 for listed officers (other than our new CEO),cash bonus largely due to the one-time, special recognitionimpact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the second quarter of 2020, partially offset by an increase in compensation related to his required relocation to Arizona in conjunction with relocation of our corporate headquarters to Tempe, Arizona. Total compensation for each of Messrs. Morici and Pudipeddi and Ms. Tay in 2020 primarily decreased as a result of lower grant date fair values of their equity awards grantedand decreased cash bonuses largely due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2014 to reward contributions towards our record-setting 2013 results and strengthen retention. Total cash compensation, increased morethe second quarter of 2020.

51


modestly which is consistent with our philosophy of linking pay to performance and reflects the Company Multiplier described above having increased in 2015 to 100.6% from 95% in 2014. For additional information regarding the amounts included in the Summary Compensation Table, see “—Compensation"Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis" above.
Stock Awards.Stock awards include time-based RSUs that typically vest over a four yearfour-year vesting period, as well as MSUs which are earned based on a comparison of Align’sour stock price performance to the NASDAQ Composite index over a 3-yearthree-year performance period.
Option Awards. We did not grant any options inperiod and vest at the past three years.end of the third year.
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. The amounts shown in this column represent employee annual incentive award payments and are reported for the year in which they were earned, though they were paid in the following year. The material terms of the performance payment plan are described under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis –Annual– Annual Cash Incentive (Bonus) Compensation.”Compensation" above.
All Other Compensation.The amounts shown in this column and detailed in the table below represent the aggregate dollar amount for each NEO for a Company 401(k) matching program, life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment premiums, our 401(k) matching program (retirement plan in the case of Ms. Tay), as well as employee discount programs for our products which are available to all employees, including our NEOs. TheNEOs, reimbursements for automobiles and medical expenses and foreign assignment and relocation expenses.
NameDollar
Value of
Life
Insurance
Premiums
Matching
contributions
under our
401(k) Plan (or retirement plan)
Employee Discount ProgramAutomobile ReimbursementMedical Expense Reimbursement Plan
Mr. Hogan$1,296 $8,550 $— $— $1,333 
Mr. Morici$1,190 $8,550 $208 $— $— 
Mr. Beard$1,146 $8,550 $— $— $— 
Ms. Tay$— $13,116 $— $29,953 $6,525 
Mr. Pudipeddi$1,080 $8,550 $— $— $662 

Foreign Assignment and Relocation Expenses. In addition to the amounts set forth in the table above, for Mr. Beard, who was asked to relocate to the United States in September 2019 on a three year employment assignment in connection with a change in his role and responsibilities to Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Americas from a similar role in EMEA and whose family remains residing in the United Kingdom, the amounts in the All Other Compensation column also include expenses related to Mr. Beard’s expatriate assignment, including (a) commuting travel expense, cost of living allowances, housing allowancesallowance, car allowance, goods and airfareservices and tax prep fees of approximately $195,712 and (b) tax equalization payments pursuant to the Company’s tax equalization policy for travel companion, relocation as well as accrued vacation upon retirementemployees on expatriate assignment. The amount shown includes the net total of tax equalization payments for Mr. Beard received by the Company, or that became fixed and determinable, during 2020 of approximately $129,074. This net amount is attributable to aggregated U.S. tax payments made by the Company of $1,284,903, UK tax payments of $924,120 offset by tax withholdings from Mr. Beard of $2,338,097. Due to time lags in tax determinations, differences in taxable periods between jurisdictions, the availability of foreign tax credits or refunds and the potential receipt by the Company of credits or refunds in subsequent years, there may be significant differences in tax equalization payments from year to year.

Also in addition to the amounts in the table above, for Mr. Hogan, who was required to move to Arizona in connection with the move of our CEO.corporate headquarters to Tempe, Arizona in January 2021, the amounts in the All Other Compensation
46


column also include employment relocation expenses of $603,118. The foregoing amount includes $284,615 for costs incurred by Mr. Hogan in relocating his residence with the remainder provided to him to make his relocation expenses tax neutral.

Name 
Dollar
Value of
Life
Insurance
Premiums
 
Matching
contributions
under Align’s
401(k) Plan
  Airfare for travel companion Accrued Vacation PayoutRelocation
Mr. Hogan $1,078
 $7,125
  $26,562
 
$10,057
Mr. Prescott $570
 $7,950
  
 $77,884

Mr. White $1,140
 $7,950
  
 

Mr. Pascaud $2,298
 
  
 

Mr. Relic $1,140
 $7,950
  
 

Mr. George $1,140
 $7,950
  
 



GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED 20152020
The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the NEOs during 2015,2020 including:
cash amounts that could have been received in 20152020 by our NEOs under the terms of our performance-based cash incentive plan (CIP); and
time-vested RSUs and performance-based MSUs awards granted by the Compensation Committee to our NEOs in 20152020 reflected on an individual grant basis.

52


20152020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
 
 
Type
of
Award
 
Grant
Date
 
Approval
Date
 
Estimated
Future
Payouts
Under
Non-Equity
Incentive
Awards
  Non-equity Incentive 
Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Awards
 
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
 
Grant Date
Fair value
of Options
and
Awards ($)
Name
Target
($)
 Maximum ($) 
Target
(#)
 
Maximum
(#)
 
Joseph M. HoganCIP     $831,300
 1,995,120
        
 RSU 6/1/2015 3/21/2015         111,000
 $6,853,140
 MSU 6/1/2015 3/21/2015     111,000
 166,500
   $7,476,960
Thomas M. PrescottCIP     $281,300
 675,120
        
RSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015         49,000
 $2,783,690
                 
MSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015     49,000
 73,500
   $2,780,750
David L. WhiteCIP     $254,000
 609,600
        
RSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015         11,500
 $653,315
                 
MSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015     11,500
 17,250
   $652,625
Raphael S. PascaudCIP     $238,000
 571,200
        
RSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015         12,000
 $681,720
                 
MSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015     12,000
 18,000
   $681,000
Zelco RelicCIP     $215,000
 516,000
        
                 
RSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015         12,000
 $681,720
                 
MSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015     12,000
 18,000
   $681,000
Roger E. GeorgeCIP     $222,000
 532,800
        
RSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015         10,700
 $607,867
                 
MSU 2/20/2015 2/2/2015     10,700
 16,050
   $607,225
 Type
of
Award
Grant
Date
Approval
Date
Estimated
Future
Payouts
Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards
 Non-equity IncentiveEstimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
Grant Date
Fair value
of Awards ($)
NameTarget
($)
Maximum ($)Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Joseph M. HoganCIP1,762,500 4,230,000 
RSU2/20/20201/28/202010,864 2,960,331 
MSU2/20/20201/28/202022,057 55,142 8,661,122 
John F. MoriciCIP378,000 907,200 
RSU2/20/20201/28/20202,415 658,063 
MSU2/20/20201/28/20204,902 12,255 1,924,868 
Simon BeardCIP364,000 873,600 
RSU2/20/20201/28/20202,173 592,121 
MSU2/20/20201/28/20204,412 11,030 1,732,460 
Julie TayCIP364,000 873,600 
RSU2/20/20201/28/20202,173 592,121 
MSU2/20/20201/28/20204,412 11,030 1,732,460 
Raj PudipeddiCIP343,000 823,200 
RSU2/20/20201/28/20202,173 592,121 
MSU2/20/20201/28/20204,412 11,030 1,732,460 
Approval Date.For each NEO equity grant, except for Mr. Hogan, the Compensation Committee met on February 2, 2015January 28, 2020 to finalize the grant of annual equity awards. Upon approval of the RSU and MSU awards, for each NEO, the Compensation Committee determined that the actual date of grant would be February 20, 2015.2020. This grant date was chosen in order to allow sufficient time for the CEO to notify each NEO and other members of the management team of the grant. In connection with Mr. Hogan joining Align as President and CEO, the Compensation Committee approved his new hire grant on March 21, 2015, with the actual date of grant of June 1, 2015.
Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards.The amounts shown under this column represent the possible dollar payouts the NEOs could have earned for 20152020 at target.target prior to the Compensation Committee's mid-year reassessment and revision of the Bonus Plan for senior management. For 2015,2020, the target cash incentive award for each NEO (other than the CEO and former CEO) was 60%70% of his base salary. For our CEO and former CEO, the target cash incentive award was 150% and 100% of his base salary, respectively, and was pro-rated based on the number of months each individual was acting in the capacity of our CEO.salary. 
For a description of the performance objectives applicable to the receipt of these payments, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis –Annual Cash Incentive Awards." The actual amount paid to each NEO for 20152020 performance is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table above in the column "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation."
Threshold. There is no threshold performance level. Rather, the Company'sAlign's financial performance below a specific target automatically reduces only the payout related to that specific goal, not the other goals, because we want executivessenior management to have the same incentive to achieve strategic priorities as well as their individual performance goals even if our financial performance tracks below the target during the course of the year.

53


Target. The target amounts assume a corporate performance percentage of 100% and that the NEO received 100% of her or his target.
Maximum. Although each financial objective isThe maximum amount a NEO can receive was initially capped at 200%240% of their target award opportunity when the Compensation Committee established goals and objectives at the beginning of 2020. That amount was later
47


reduced to 120% of their target award opportunity when the Compensation Committee reassessed our annual cash incentive plan mid-year. Please see the discussion above under "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan" for fundinga further discussion of the total pool available for distribution, there is no maximum amount that an NEO could receive.mid-year adjustments to our 2020 Bonus Plan performance goals.
Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards.Awards:
Focal Awards Granted February 2020. The amounts shown under this columnfor MSU awards granted in February 2020 represent potential share payouts with respect to MSUs. Each MSU vests over a three-year performance period, with 100% vesting inas of February 2018.2023. The actual number of MSUsshares eligible to vest will be determined based on a comparison of Align’sour stock price performance relative to the performance of the NASDAQ Composite index over the three-year performance period, up to a maximum of 150%250% of the number of target shares. If Align under-performswe under-perform the NASDAQ Composite index, the percentage at which the MSUs convert into shares of Alignour stock will be reduced from 100%, at a rate of twothree to one (two-percentage-point(three-percentage-point reduction in units for each percentage point of under-performance), with a minimum percentage of 0%. This means that no shares will vest if Align underperformswe underperform the NASDAQ Composite index by 50%approximately 33%. If Align outperformswe outperform the NASDAQ Composite index, the percentage at which the MSUs convert to shares will be increased from 100%, at a rate of twothree to one (two-percentage-point(three-percentage-point increase in units for each percentage point of over-performance), with a maximum percentage of 150%250%. This means that if Align outperforms the NASDAQ Composite index by 25%approximately 50%, the maximum number of shares that will vest is 150%250% of the award amount.
Stock Awards. Stock awards represent grants of RSUs under our 2005 Incentive Plan. Since RSUs are taxable to each NEO when they vest, the number of shares we issue to each named executive officer will be net of applicable withholding taxes which we will be paid by Alignpay on behalf of each NEO. The RSUs will result in payment to the NEO only if the vesting criteria are met.is met and the NEO then sells the stock that has vested. Each RSU granted to our NEOs vestvests over a four-year period with 25% of the shares subject to the RSU vesting each anniversary of the date of grant, with full vesting in four years.
Grant Date Fair Value. The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of awards of RSUs and MSUs.MSUs, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Assumptions used in the calculations of theseMSUs amounts are included in Note 9Notes 1 and 12 to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20152020 included in the Company’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016.2021. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value amounts will ever be realized. The RSUs are time based awards and are not subject to performance conditions. Amounts for MSUs represent the estimate of the aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the three-year performance period determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718, excludingdate. For MSU awards granted in February 2020, the effect of estimated forfeitures. The actual number of shares that arewill be paid out will depend on Align’sour stock price performance relative to the performance of the NASDAQ Composite index over the three-year performance period, up to a maximum of 150%250% of the number of target shares.
Timing of Equity Grants. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with management, our independent auditors and legal counsel, has adopted the following practices on equity compensation awards:
Align doesWe do not plan to time, nor has ithave we timed, the release of material non-public information for the purpose of affecting the exercise price of itsany stock options;options should we decide to grant stock options again in the future;
consistent with the policy described in the bullet point above, all awards of equity compensation for new employees (other than new executive officers described in the next bullet point) are made on the first day of the month for those employees who started during the period between the 16th day of the month that is two months prior to the grant date and the 15th day of the month prior to the month of the grant date. For example, May 1, 2016 grants will cover new hires starting between March 16, 2016 and April 15, 2016; and
annualConsistent with the policy described in the bullet point above, all awards of equity compensation for new employees (other than new members of senior management) are made on the first day of the month for those employees who started during the period between the 16th day of the month that is two months prior to the grant date and the 15th day of the month prior to the month of the grant date. For example, May 1, 2020 grants will cover new hires starting between March 16, 2020 and April 15, 2020; and
Annual incentive grants are made on or about the same day for all employees (including executive officers)members of senior management); in each of 2015, 20142020, 2019, and 20132018 such date was February 20. The Compensation Committee sets the actual grant date approximately one week following approval of the size of each grant in order to provide Align managersmanagement with adequate time to inform each employee individually of their grant.

54
48


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 20152020 YEAR END
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 20152020 for each NEO. All vesting is contingent upon their continued employment with Align. Market values and payout values in this table are calculated based on the closing market price of our common stock of $534.38 per share, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on December 31, 2015,2020, which was $65.85 per share.the last trading day of the year.
NameStock Awards
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)
F
o
o
t
n
o
t
e
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not
Vested
($)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have Not Vested
(#)
F
o
o
t
n
o
t
e
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
Joseph M. Hogan6,250 (1)3,339,875 
4,800 (2)2,565,024 
10,046 (3)5,368,381 
10,864 (4)5,805,504 
19,200 (5)10,260,096 
43,100 (6)23,031,778 
26,789 (7)14,315,506 
22,057 (8)11,786,820 
John F. Morici1,750 (1)935,165 
1,573 (9)840,580 
1,150 (2)614,537 
2,009 (3)1,073,569 
2,415 (4)1,290,528 
4,500 (5)2,404,710 
5,358 (7)2,863,208 
4,902 (8)2,619,531 
Simon Beard1,500 (1)801,570 
900 (2)480,942 
1,674 (3)894,552 
2,173 (4)1,161,208 
3,700 (5)1,977,206 
4,465 (7)2,386,007 
4,412 (8)2,357,685 
Julie Tay1,550 (1)828,289 
900 (2)480,942 
1,785 (3)953,868 
2,173 (4)1,161,208 
3,700 (5)1,977,206 
4,763 (7)2,545,252 
4,412 (8)2,357,685 
Raj Pudipeddi6,697 (10)3,578,743 
2,173 (4)1,161,208 
4,412 (8)2,357,685 

(1)RSUs vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on February 20, 2018, February 20, 2019, February 20, 2020 and February 20, 2021.
(2)RSUs vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on February 20, 2019, February 20, 2020, February 20, 2021, and February 20, 2022
(3)RSUs vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on February 20, 2020, February 20, 2021, February 20, 2022, and February 20, 2023.
(4)RSUs vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on February 20, 2021, February 20, 2022, February 20, 2023, and February 20, 2024.
(5)MSUs vest 100% on February 20, 2021.
(6)MSUs vest 100% on June 20, 2021.
49
NameOption Awards Stock Awards
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
Exercisable
 
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
Unexercisable
 
F
o
o
t
n
o
t
e
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
 
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 
Option
Expiration
Date
 
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
 
F
o
o
t
n
o
t
e
 
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
that have
Not Vested
(#)
 
F
o
o
t
n
o
t
e
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)
Joseph M. Hogan            83,250
 (1) 5,482,013
      
                   111,000
 (2) 7,309,350
                        
Thomas M. Prescott13,125
   (3)   20.79
 2/18/2018            
            15,625
 (4) 1,028,906
      
             27,500
 (5) 1,810,875
      
             30,000
 (8) 1,975,500
      
             20,000
 (8) 1,317,000
      
             49,000
 (13) 3,226,650
      
                   75,000
 (6) 4,938,750
                   90,000
 (10) 5,926,500
                   49,000
 (14) 3,226,650
                        
David White            36,824
 (7) 2,424,860
      
             5,625
 (8) 370,406
      
             8,000
 (9) 526,800
      
             11,500
 (13) 757,275
      
                   15,500
 (10) 1,020,675
                   11,500
 (14) 757,275
                        
Raphael S. Pascaud5,400
   (15)   20.79
 2/18/2018            
            1,000
 (4) 65,850
      
             3,750
 (5) 246,938
      
             2,500
 (11) 164,625
      
             17,392
 (12) 1,145,263
      
             7,350
 (8) 483,998
      
             1,000
 (9) 65,850
      
             12,000
 (13) 790,200
      
                   5,900
 (10) 388,515
                   12,000
 (14) 790,200
                        
                        
Zelco Relic  
         15,550
 (16) 1,023,968
      
            750
 (8) 49,388
      
             1,000
 (9) 65,850
      
             12,000
 (13) 790,200
      
                        

55


                        
                        
                   2,000
 (10) 131,700
                   12,000
 (14) 790,200
                        
Roger E. George                       
            4,125
 (4) 271,631
      
             12,824
 (5) 844,460
      
             10,575
 (8) 696,364
      
             7,800
 (9) 513,630
      
             10,700
 (13) 704,595
      
                   25,650
 (6) 1,689,053
                   21,900
 (10) 1,442,115
                   10,700
 (14) 704,595

(1)Restricted stock unit vest at a rate of 25% on December 31, 2015, December 31, 2016, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018.
(2)Performance stock units vest on June 1, 2018.
(3)Fully vested on February 20, 2015.
(4)Restricted stock units vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares subject to the restricted stock unit on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on February 20, 2013, February 20, 2014, February 20, 2015 and February 20, 2016.
(5)Restricted stock units vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares subject to the restricted stock unit on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on February 20, 2014, February 20, 2015, February 20, 2016 and February 20, 2017.
(6)Market stock units vest at a rate of 100% on February 20, 2016 for full vesting at the end of the three-year performance cycle.
(7)Restricted stock units vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares subject to the restricted stock unit on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on August 20, 2014, August 20, 2015, August 20, 2016, and August 20, 2017.
(8)Restricted stock units vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares subject to the restricted stock unit on the first year, second year, third, fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on February 20, 2015, February 20, 2016, February 20, 2017, and February 20, 2018.
(9)Restricted stock units vest at the rate of 50% on February 20, 2016 and 50% on February 20, 2017.
(10)Market stock units vest at a rate of 100% on February 20, 2017 for full vesting at the end of three-year performance cycle.
(11)Restricted stock units vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares subject to the restricted stock unit on the first year, second year, third and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on November 20, 2014, November 20, 2015, November 20, 2016, and November 20, 2017.
(12)Restricted stock units vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares subject to the restricted stock unit on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on January 20, 2015, January 20, 2016, January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2018.
(13)Restricted stock units vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares subject to the restricted stock unit on the first year, second year, third year, and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on February 20, 2016, February 20, 2017, February 20, 2018 and February 20, 2019.
(14)Performance stock units vest at a rate of 100% on February 20, 2018
(15)Fully vested December 1, 2014.
(16)Restricted stock units vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares subject to the restricted stock unit on the first year, second year, third and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on December 20, 2014, December 20, 2015, December 20, 2016, and December 20, 2017.



56

(9)RSUs vest at a rate of Contents25% of the total number of shares on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on September 20, 2018, September 20, 2019, September 20, 2020, and September 20, 2021.
(10)RSUs vest at a rate of 25% of the total number of shares on the first year, second year, third year and fourth year anniversary of the date of grant for vesting on March 20, 2020, March 20, 2021, March 20, 2022 and March 20, 2023.

50



OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING FISCAL YEAR ENDED 20152020
The following table provides information concerning each exercise of stock options, and eachthe vesting of restricted stock units,Stock Awards for each NEO during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.    2020:
Stock Awards
Name
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting (1)
Value
Realized
on
Vesting (2)
Joseph M. Hogan95,499 $26,022,523 
John F. Morici23,276 $7,237,740 
Simon Beard16,633 $4,532,326 
Julie Tay17,246 $4,699,363 
Raj Pudipeddi2,233 $323,383 
(1)For each NEO, such number of shares represents the gross number of shares acquired by the NEO on the vesting date; however, because RSUs and MSUs are taxable to the individuals when they vest, the number of shares we issue to each of our NEOs is net of applicable withholding taxes which are paid by us on their behalf.
(2)The value realized on vesting equals the closing price per share of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on the vesting date multiplied by the gross number of shares acquired on vesting as described above in note 1.

51
  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name 
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
 
Value
Realized
Upon
Exercise (1)
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting (2)
 
Value
Realized
on
Vesting (3)
Joseph M. Hogan 
 $
 27,750
 $1,827,338
Thomas M. Prescott 
 $
 133,125
 $7,562,831
David L. White 
 $
 20,288
 $1,174,841
Raphael S. Pascaud 
 $
 12,373
 $712,580
Zelco Relic 
 $
 8,025
 $513,047
Roger E. George 2,563
 $97,138
 38,813
 $2,204,967

(1)
The value realized on exercise equals the difference between (a) either (i) the actual sales price of our common stock underlying the options exercised if the shares were immediately sold or (ii) the closing price per share of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on the date of exercise if the shares were held and (b) the applicable exercise price of such stock options.
(2)
For each NEO, such number of shares represents the gross number of shares acquired by the NEO on the vesting date; however, because RSUs and MSUs are taxable to the individuals when they vest, the number of shares we issue to each of our NEOs is net of applicable withholding taxes which are paid by us on their behalf.
(3)
The value realized on vesting equals the closing price per share of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on the vesting date multiplied by the gross number of shares acquired on vesting as described above in note (2).


57


POTENTIAL PAYMENT UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL
Named Executive Officers (Other than the CEO)
We enter into employment agreements with each of our executive officers. Each employment agreement with our NEOs (other than the CEO) contains substantially the same terms and conditions. Each employment agreement sets forth the base salary, bonus opportunity, stock options, benefits and the responsibilities of each position in effect at the time of execution of the agreement. In addition, each agreement requires Align to provide compensation to these officerstables in the event of termination of employment or a change of control of Align. The compensation due in the event of the termination of each employment agreement varies depending on the nature of the termination. What is meant by the terms “cause”, “good reason” and “change of control” is described more fully at the end of this section under the heading “Employment Agreement Definitions”. The information below does not include our former CEO as he was no longer employed by Align as of December 31, 2015.
The following table describes the potential payments upon termination or a change of control for each of our NEOs (other than the CEO):

NameType of Payment 
Payments Upon
Involuntary or Good
Reason Termination
Unrelated to Change
of Control
 
Payments Upon
Involuntary or
Good Reason
Termination
Related to a
Change of
Control
 
Change of
Control Only
David L. WhiteSeverance Payment $932,800
 $932,800
 
 Equity      
 RSUs $1,788,618
 $4,079,342
 $1,788,618
 MSUs $1,277,608
 $2,666,925
 $1,277,608
 Health and Welfare Benefits $19,017
 $19,017
 
 Total $4,018,043
 $7,698,084
 $3,066,226
        
Raphael S. PascaudSeverance Payment $873,400
 $873,400
 
 Equity      
 RSUs $1,045,237
 $2,962,723
 $1,045,237
 MSUs $702,929
 $1,768,073
 $702,929
 Health and Welfare Benefits     
 Total $2,621,566
 $5,604,196
 $1,748,166
        
Zelko RelicSeverance Payment $787,600
 $787,600
 
 Equity      
 RSUs $758,921
 $1,929,405
 $758,921
 MSUs $463,694
 $1,382,850
 $463,694
 Health and Welfare Benefits $24,963
 $24,963
 
 Total $2,035,178
 $4,124,818
 $1,222,615
        
Roger E. GeorgeSeverance Payment $814,000
 $814,000
 
 Equity      
 RSUs $1,358,979
 $3,030,680
 $1,358,979
 MSUs $4,065,424
 $5,753,644
 $4,065,424
 Health and Welfare Benefits $24,963
 $24,963
 
 Total $6,263,366
 $9,623,287
 $5,424,403

NEOs. All amounts in the table above are estimated based on an assumed triggering date of December 31, 20152020 and the closing salessale price of our common stock of $534.38, on the NASDAQ Global Market on December 31, 2015 of $65.852020, which was the last trading day of the year. In addition, the MSU calculation is based on the performance of Align stock relative to the NASDAQ Composite index assuming the performance period ended December 31, 2015.
Termination Unrelated to a Change of Control. A termination unrelated to a change of control is a termination that occurs either before or 12 months after the change of control date. Each employment agreement with our NEOs (other than the CEO)

58


provides that in the event the executive’s employment is terminated without cause or if the executive resigns for good reason, such executive will:
(1) immediately vest in an additional number of shares under all outstanding option and RSU awards as if the executive had performed 12 additional months of service;
(2) in the case of MSUs, the performance period shall be deemed to end upon the NEO’s employment termination date for the purpose of determining the percentage amount that Align has over or underperformed the NASDAQ Composite index (the “Performance Multiplier”). The Performance Multiplier is calculated as follows:
(i)if Align under-performs the NASDAQ Composite index, the percentage at which the MSUs convert into shares of Align stock will be reduced from 100% at a rate of two to one (two-percentage-point reduction in units for each percentage point of under-performance); and
(ii)if Align outperforms the index, the percentage at which the MSUs convert to shares will be increased from 100% at a rate of two to one (two-percentage-point increase in units for each percentage point of over-performance).
The executive will then vest in that number of market stock units equal to A/36*X*Y with (A) representing the number of months (including partial months) that have elapsed from the commencement of the performance period through the date of the termination of employment and (X) representing the total number of MSUs subject to the award and (Y) representing the Performance Multiplier. With respect to the MSU awards, from the beginning of the performance period in each of February 2014, 2013 and 2012 until the assumed December 31, 2015 termination date, Align had outperformed the NASDAQ Composite Index by more than 25% which resulted in a Performance Multiplier of 150% in the calculations set forth in the above table.
(3)such executive is also entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to:
(i)the then current annual base salary;
(ii)the then current year’s target bonus, prorated for the number of days such executive has been employed during the year; and
(iii)the greater of the then current year’s target bonus or the prior year’s actual bonus.
Each employment agreement also provides that Align will pay the NEO's monthly premium under COBRA until the earliest of 12 months (18 months in the case of the CEO) following the termination of employment if terminated without cause or resignation for good reason or the date upon which the executive commences new employment.
Change of Control Only. Each employment agreement with our named executive officers provides that in the event of a change of control the executive will immediately vest in an additional number of shares under all outstanding stock option and RSU awards as if he or she had performed 12 additional months of service. For the purposes of determining the number of MSUs that will vest:
the performance period shall be deemed to end upon the closing of the change of control in order to determine Align’s stock price performance relative to the NASDAQ Composite index for the purpose of calculating the amount that Align has over or underperformed the NASDAQ Composite index (with the MSUs converting into shares of Align stock either being reduced from 100% (in the case of underperformance) or increased from 100% (in the case of overperformance) at a rate of two to one (the “Performance Multiplier”); and
Align’s stock price performance will be based on the per share value of the Company’s common stock paid to its stockholders in connection with the change of control.
On the date of the change of control, the executive will vest in that number of MSUs equal to A/36*X*Ywith (A) representing the number of months (including partial months) that have elapsed from the commencement of the performance period through the date of the change of control and (X) representing the total number of MSUs subject to the award and (Y) representing the Performance Multiplier.
A Termination Related to a Change of Control. A termination related to a change of control is a termination that occurs within 12 months from the change of control date. Each employment agreement with our named executive officers (other than the CEO) provides that, if, within 12 months of a change of control either the executive’s employment is terminated without cause or the executive resigns for good reason then the executive will:
(1)immediately vest in all outstanding equity awards; and
(2)be entitled to a payment (payable in a lump sum) equal to:
(i)executive’s then current annual base salary;

59


(ii)executive’s then current year’s target bonus prorated for the number of days employed during the year, and
(iii)the greater of the then current year’s target bonus or the prior year’s actual bonus.
Each employment agreement also provides that Align will pay the NEOs monthly premium under COBRA until the earliest of 12 months following the termination of employment if terminated without cause or resignation for good reason or the date upon which the executive commences new employment.
Conditions to Payment. Prior to receiving any payments upon termination of employment, the executive officer must execute a general release of all known and unknown claims that such officer may have against Align and agree not to prosecute any legal action or other proceedings based upon any of such claims. In addition, each executive has agreed, for a period of one year following termination, not to solicit employees of Align and has further agreed to be bound by the terms of a confidentiality agreement with Align.
Chief Executive OfficerMr. Hogan
Mr. Hogan serves as our President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO pursuant to an employment agreement entered into on April 17,16, 2015. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Hogan is entitled to an annual target bonus of 150% of his base salary based upon the attainment of performance objectives agreed upon in each fiscal year and established by the Board.
The following table describes the potential payments upon termination or a change of control for our Chief Executive Officer. Note that all amounts are estimated based on an assumed triggering date of December 31, 2015 and the closing sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on December 31, 2015 of $65.85, which was the last trading day of the year.Mr. Hogan:

NameType of Payment 
Payments Upon
Involuntary or Good
Reason Termination
Unrelated to
Change of Control
 
Payments Upon
Involuntary or
Good Reason
Termination
Related to a
Change of
Control
 
Change of
Control
Only
 Death or DisabilityNameType of PaymentPayments Upon Involuntary or Good Reason Termination Unrelated to
Change of Control
Payments Upon Involuntary or Good Reason Termination Related to a Change of ControlChange of
Control
Only
Death or Disability
Joseph M. HoganSeverance Payment $5,462,500
 $5,462,500
 $
 $
Joseph M. HoganSeverance Payment$7,333,000 $7,333,000 $— $— 
Equity        
RSUs   $5,482,013
 $1,827,338
 $5,482,013
RSUs— 17,078,785 7,863,224 17,078,785 
MSUs   $10,964,025
 $2,131,894
 $10,964,025
MSUs— 149,552,506 103,587,621 149,552,506 
Health and Welfare Benefits $1,304
 $1,304
 $1,304
 $
Health and Welfare Benefits1,485 1,485 — — 
Total $5,463,804
 $21,909,842
 $3,960,536
 $16,446,038
Total$7,334,485 $173,965,776 $111,450,845 $166,631,291 
Termination Unrelated to a Change of Control.A termination unrelated to a change of control is a termination that occurs either before or 18 months after the change of control date. In the event Mr. Hogan is terminated other than for cause, death or disability or he resigns for good reason, Mr. Hogan is entitled to a payment (payable in a lump sum) equal to:
(1)twice his then current annual base salary;
(2)the then current year’s target bonus, prorated for the number of days Mr. Hogan has been employed during the year; and
(3)the greater of 150% of the then current year’s target bonus or the prior year’s actual bonus.

(1)twice his then current annual base salary;
(2)the then current year’s target bonus, prorated for the number of days Mr. Hogan has been employed during the year; and
(3)the greater of 150% of the then current year’s target bonus or the prior year’s actual bonus.
Mr. Hogan's employment agreement also provides that Align will pay his monthly premium under COBRA until the earliest of 18 months following the termination of employment if terminated without cause or resignation for good reason or the date upon which Mr. Hogan commences new employment.
Change of Control Only.In the event of a change of control, Mr. Hogan will immediately vest in an additional number of shares under all outstanding stock option and RSU awards as if he had performed 12 additional months of service. For the purposes of determining the number of MSUs that will vest:

the performance period shall be deemed to end upon the closing of the change of control in order to determine Align’sour stock price performance relative to the NASDAQ Composite index for the purpose of calculating the amount that Align haswe have over or underperformed the NASDAQ Composite index (with the MSUs converting into shares of Align stock either being reduced from 100% (in the case of underperformance) or increased from 100% (in the case of overperformance) at a rate of two to oneover-performance) (the “Performance Multiplier”"Performance Multiplier"); and

60


Align’sour stock price performance will be based on the per share value of the Company’sour common stock paid to itsour stockholders in connection with the change of control.
On the date of the change of control, Mr. Hogan will vest in that number of MSUs equal to A/(A)/36*X*Y(X)*(Y) with (A) representing the number of months (including partial months) that have elapsed from the commencement of the performance period through the date of the change of control and (X) representing the total number of MSUs subject to the award and (Y) representing the Performance Multiplier.
Termination Related to a Change of Control.A termination related to a change of control is a termination that occurs within 18 months fromafter the change of control date. If within 18 months ofafter a change of control either Mr. Hogan’sHogan's employment is terminated other than for cause, death or disability or Mr. Hogan resigns for good reason, he would immediately vest in all outstanding equity awards and receive a payment (payable in a lump sum) equal to:
(1)twice his then current annual salary;
(2)the then current year’s target bonus, prorated for the number of days Mr. Hogan has been employed during the year; and
(3)the greater of 150% of the then current year’s target bonus or the prior year’s actual bonus.
(1)twice his then current annual salary;
(2)the then current year's target bonus, prorated for the number of days Mr. Hogan has been employed during the year; and
52


(3)the greater of 150% of the then current year's target bonus or the prior year's actual bonus.

Mr. Hogan’sHogan's employment agreement also provides that Alignwe will pay his monthly premium under COBRA until the earliest of 18 months following the termination of employment if terminated without cause or resignation for good reason or the date upon which Mr. Hogan commences new employment.

Death or Disability. In the event Mr. Hogan's employment terminates as a result of his death or disability, Mr. Hogan (or his estate) will immediately vest in 100% of all outstanding equity awards. On the date of the employment termination due to death or disability, the performance period shall be considered closed, and the date of the termination shall be used in order to determine Align'sour stock price performance relative to the NASDAQ Composite index for the purpose of calculating the amount that Align has over or underperformed the NASDAQ Composite index (with the MSUs converting into shares of Align stock either being reduced from 100% (in the case of underperformance) or increased from 100% (in the case of overperformance) at a rate of two to one.index.

Conditions to Payment.Prior to receiving any payments upon termination of his employment, Mr. Hogan must execute a general release of all known and unknown claims that he may have against Align and agree not to prosecute any legal action or other proceedings based upon any of such claims. In addition, Mr. Hoganhe has agreed, for a period of one year following termination, not to solicit employees of Alignour employees and has further agreed to be bound by the terms of a confidentiality agreement with Align.us.

Messrs. Morici and Pudipeddi

Mr. Morici serves as our Chief Financial Officer pursuant to an employment agreement entered into on November 7, 2016 and Mr. Pudipeddi pursuant to a similar agreement entered into on February 4, 2019. In determining the terms of their agreements, the Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Morici and Pudipeddi (and any individual joining Align or who is promoted to a senior management position after September 2016) would have a similar form of employment agreement with severance and change of control provisions described in the table below. Specifically, these updated forms of employment agreement provide only for one year's base salary upon termination by us for convenience unrelated to a change of control which is a termination that occurs either before or 18 months after the change of control date. In addition, in the event of a change of control, the Compensation Committee has determined that all cash severance and equity acceleration is subject to a double trigger as described below.
The following table describes the potential payments upon termination or a change of control for Messrs. Morici and Pudipeddi:
NameType of PaymentPayments Upon Involuntary or Good Reason Termination Unrelated to  Change of ControlPayments Upon Involuntary or Good Reason Termination Related to a Change of ControlChange of
Control Only
John F. MoriciSeverance Payment$540,000 $1,616,000 N/A
RSUs— 4,754,379 N/A
MSUs— 17,269,665 
Health and Welfare Benefits— 28,494 N/A
Total$540,000 $23,668,538 
Raj PudipeddiSeverance Payment$490,000 $1,451,000 N/A
RSUs— 4,739,951 N/A
MSUs— 5,894,211 
Health and Welfare Benefits— 28,494 N/A
Total$490,000 $12,113,656 
Termination Unrelated to a Change of Control. A termination for convenience unrelated to a change of control is a termination that occurs either before or 18 months after the change of control date. Upon such occurrence, the employment agreements of Messrs. Morici and Pudipeddi each provide that if his employment is terminated without cause or if he resigns for good reason, he will receive one year's base salary.
A Termination Related to a Change of Control. A termination related to a change of control is a termination that occurs within 18 months after the date of a change of control. If within 18 months after a change of control the employment of either Messrs. Morici or Pudipeddi is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason, then he would:
(1)immediately vest in all outstanding equity awards;
(2)receive a lump sum payment equal to:
(a)his then current annual base salary;
53


(b)his then current year's target bonus, prorated for the number of days he has been employed during the year; and
(c)the greater of his then current year's target bonus or the prior year's actual bonus.
The employment agreement also provides that Align will pay his monthly premium under COBRA until the earliest of 12 months following the termination of employment if terminated without cause or resignation for good reason or the date upon which he commences new employment.
Conditions to Payment. Prior to receiving any payments upon termination of employment, Messrs. Morici and Pudipeddi must each execute a general release of all known and unknown claims that he may have against Align and agree not to prosecute any legal action or other proceedings based upon any of such claims. In addition, each of Messrs. Morici and Pudipeddi have agreed, for a period of one year following termination, not to solicit our employees and has further agreed to be bound by the terms of a confidentiality agreement with us.

Ms. Tay and Mr. Beard

The employment agreement entered into by each of Ms. Tay and Mr. Beard contain substantially the same terms and conditions. Each employment agreement sets forth the base salary, bonus opportunity, stock options, benefits and the responsibilities of each position in effect at the time of execution of the agreement. In addition, each agreement requires we provide compensation to each of Ms. Tay and Mr. Beard in the event of termination of employment or a change of control. The compensation due in the event of the termination of each employment agreement varies depending on the nature of the termination. What is meant by the terms "cause", "good reason" and "change of control" is described more fully at the end of this section under the heading "Employment Agreement Definitions".

NameType of PaymentPayments Upon Involuntary or Good Reason Termination Unrelated to Change of ControlPayments Upon Involuntary or Good Reason Termination Related to a Change of
Control
Change of
Control Only
Simon BeardSeverance Payment$1,568,000 $1,568,000 $— 
RSUs1,630,527 3,338,272 1,630,527 
MSUs8,209,068 14,788,657 8,209,068 
Health and Welfare Benefits8,977 8,977 — 
Total$11,416,572 $19,703,906 $9,839,595 
Julie TaySeverance Payment$1,542,000 $1,542,000 $— 
RSUs1,677,018 3,424,307 1,677,018 
MSUs8,456,662 15,186,770 8,456,662 
Health and Welfare Benefits— — — 
Total$11,675,680 $20,153,077 $10,133,680 
Termination Unrelated to a Change of Control. A termination for convenience unrelated to a change of control is a termination that occurs either before or 12 months after the change of control date. Upon such occurrence, these employment agreements provide that in the event the employment of Ms. Tay or Mr. Beard is terminated without cause or if either resigns for good reason, each will:

(1) immediately vest in an additional number of shares under all outstanding option and RSU awards as if she or he had performed 12 additional months of service;
(2) in the case of MSUs, the performance period shall be deemed to end upon her or his employment termination date for the purpose of determining the percentage amount that Align has over or underperformed the NASDAQ Composite index (the "Performance Multiplier"). The Performance Multiplier is calculated as follows:
(i)if we under-perform the NASDAQ Composite index, the percentage at which the MSUs convert into shares of Align stock will be reduced from 100% at a rate of three to one; and
(ii)if we outperform the index, the percentage at which the MSUs convert to shares will be increased from 100% at a rate of three to one.
Each NEO will then vest in that number of MSUs equal to (A)/36*(X)*(Y) with (A) representing the number of months (including partial months) that have elapsed from the commencement of the performance period through the date of the termination of employment and (X) representing the total number of MSUs subject to the award and (Y) representing the
54


Performance Multiplier. With respect to the MSU awards, from the beginning of the performance period in each of February 2017, 2018, and 2019 until the assumed December 31, 2020 termination date, if we had outperformed the NASDAQ Composite Index by more than 33% for the 2017 grant and 50% for the 2018 and 2019 grants which resulted in a Performance Multiplier of at maximum of 200% (for the 2017 grant) and 250% (for the 2018 and 2019 grants) in the calculations set forth in the above table.
(3)she or he is also entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to:
(a)her or his then current annual base salary;
(b)her or his then current year's target bonus, prorated for the number of days she or he has been employed during the year; and
(c)the greater of her or his then current year's target bonus or the prior year's actual bonus.
Each employment agreement also provides that we will pay such NEO's monthly premium under COBRA until the earliest of 12 months following the termination of employment if terminated without cause or resignation for good reason or the date upon which each commences new employment.
Change of Control Only. The employment agreements with each of Ms. Tay and Mr. Beard provide that in the event of a change of control she or he will immediately vest in an additional number of shares under all outstanding stock option and RSU awards as if she or he had performed 12 additional months of service. For the purposes of determining the number of MSUs that will vest:

the performance period shall be deemed to end upon the closing of the change of control in order to determine our stock price performance relative to the NASDAQ Composite index for the purpose of calculating the amount that we have over or underperformed the NASDAQ Composite index (with the MSUs converting into shares of Align stock either being reduced from 100% (in the case of underperformance) or increased from 100% (in the case of over performance) at a rate of three to one (the "Performance Multiplier"); and
our stock price performance will be based on the per share value of our common stock paid to our stockholders in connection with the change of control.
On the date of the change of control, each will vest in that number of MSUs equal to (A)/36*(X)*(Y) with (A) representing the number of months (including partial months) that have elapsed from the commencement of the performance period through the date of the change of control and (X) representing the total number of MSUs subject to the award and (Y) representing the Performance Multiplier.
A Termination Related to a Change of Control. A termination related to a change of control is a termination that occurs within 12 months from the change of control date. The employment agreements with each of Ms. Tay, and Mr. Beard provide that, if, within 12 months of a change of control, either her or his employment is terminated without cause or she or he resigns for good reason then she or he will:

(1)immediately vest in all outstanding equity awards; and
(2)be entitled to a payment (payable in a lump sum) equal to:
(a)her or his then current annual base salary;
(b)her or his then current year's target bonus prorated for the number of days employed during the year, and
(c)the greater of her or his then current year's target bonus or the prior year's actual bonus.
Each employment agreement also provides that we will pay their monthly premium under COBRA until the earliest of 12 months following the termination of employment if terminated without cause or resignation for good reason or the date upon which each commences new employment.
Conditions to Payment. Prior to receiving any payments upon termination of employment, Ms. Tay and Mr. Beard must execute a general release of all known and unknown claims that either may have against Align and agree not to prosecute any legal action or other proceedings based upon any of such claims. In addition, each has agreed, for a period of one year following termination, not to solicit our employees and further agreed to be bound by the terms of a confidentiality agreement with us.
Employment Agreement Definitions
Definition of Cause.In each employment agreement described above, cause means any of the following:
unauthorized use or disclosure of the confidential information or trade secrets of Align;
any breach of the employment agreement, or the Employee Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement or the Align Protection Agreement between the executivethem and Align;
55


conviction of, or a plea of “guilty” or “no contest” to, a felony under the laws of the United States or any state thereof;
misappropriation of theour assets of Align or any act of fraud or embezzlement by the executive,them, or any act of dishonesty by the executivethem in connection with the performance of hisher or herhis duties for Alignus that adversely affects itsour business or affairs;
intentional misconduct; or
the executive’sindividual's failure to satisfactorily perform hisher or herhis duties after the executivehaving received written notice of such failure and was provided at least thirty (30) days to cure such failure.
Definition of Good Reason.In each employment agreement described above, good reason means the executive’sindividual's resignation within ninety (90) days of the occurrence of any one or more of the following events:
the executive’stheir position, authority or responsibilities being significantly reduced;
the executivetheir being asked to relocate her or his principal place of employment such that the commuting distance from hisher or herhis residence prior to the change of control is increased by over thirty-five (35) miles;
the executive’stheir annual base salary or bonus being reduced; or
the executive’stheir benefits being materially reduced.

61


Definition of Change of Control.In each employment agreement described above, change of control means any of the following:
a sale of all or substantially all of Align’sour assets;
the acquisition of more than 50% of theour common stock of Align by any person or group of persons;
a reorganization of Align wherein the holders of our common stock of Align receive stock in another company (other than a subsidiary of Align), a merger of Align with another company wherein there is a 50% or greater change in the ownership of theour common stock of Align as a result of such merger, or any other transaction in which Alignwe (other than as the parent corporation) isare consolidated for federal income tax purposes or isare eligible to be consolidated for federal income tax purposes with another corporation; or
in the event that the common stock is traded on an established securities market, a public announcement that any person has acquired or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of more than 50% of theour then outstanding common stock, or the commencement of or public announcement of an intention to make a tender offer or exchange offer for more than 50% of theour then outstanding common stock.
Other Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements
In addition to the termination of employment and change of control arrangements described above, the Compensation Committee of the Board has the authority as Plan Administrator of the 2005 Incentive Plan (as amended) to accelerate the vesting of outstanding equity immediately upon an acquisition or change in ownership or majority of the Board.

Other Compensation Matters

CEO Pay Ratio  

Our compensation and benefits philosophy and the overall structure of our compensation and benefit programs are broadly similar across the organization. Compensation rates are benchmarked and set to be market-competitive in the country in which the jobs are performed. We identified the median employee using our employee population on December 31, 2020. As of that date, we had 18,178 employees, of which 1,582 were employed inside the United States, 13,315 (approximately 73% of our global workforce) were employed in one of our manufacturing and technician operations in Mexico, Costa Rica, China, Germany or Spain, and the remaining 3,281 employees were employed in 36 other countries.

In identifying the median employee, we excluded 838 workers (approximately 4.6% of our workforce) from the following countries: Austria, 7; Baltics (Lithuania and Latvia), 1; Belgium, 10; Croatia, 4; Czechoslovakia, 4; Denmark, 8; Finland, 1; Hong Kong, 44; Hungary, 1; India, 128; Ireland, 4; Luxembourg, 1; New Zealand, 4; Norway, 3; Poland, 370; Portugal, 4; Slovakia, 3; South Korea, 42; Sweden, 4; Taiwan, 43; Thailand, 44; Turkey, 33; United Arab Emirates, 32; and Vietnam, 43. After taking into account the de minimis exemption, 1,582 employees in the United States and 15,759 employees located outside of the United States were considered for identifying the median employee.

We considered actual annual base pay, actual bonus payout, and equity income, for the purposes of determining the median employee. We annualized the salaries for those employees that were hired in 2020. We did not perform adjustments to the compensation paid to part-time employees to calculate what they would have been paid on a full-time basis.

Using this methodology, we determined that our median employee was a CAD Designer 2 working in our treat facility in Costa Rica. In determining the annual total compensation of the median employee, we calculated such employee’s
56


compensation in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K as required pursuant to SEC executive compensation disclosure rules. This calculation is the same calculation used to determine total compensation for purposes of the 2020 Summary Compensation Table with respect to each of the NEOs.

Our median employee compensation for a CAD Designer 2 position in Costa Rica in 2020 as calculated using Summary Compensation Table requirements was $11,961. Our CEO’s compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table was $15,522,289. Therefore, our CEO to median employee pay ratio is 1,298 to 1.

This information is being provided for compliance purposes. Neither the Compensation Committee nor management of the Company used the pay ratio measure in making compensation decisions.

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Our purpose as an organization is to transform smiles and change lives and it is the purpose that is the heart of who we are as an organization; making us critically aware of the role and impact we have on society as a global corporate citizen. Our Board and management realize that for us to fulfill our purpose we must be committed to improving the lives of our employees, customers and their patients, suppliers, stockholders, and the communities in which we live and work. Conducting our business ethically, responsibly, and transparently through open and clear disclosures that allow us and others to hold us accountable is the right thing to do and is just the beginning. In the long run, our efforts will benefit the world in which we live, generate pride and commitment from our employees, strengthen our brand, and ultimately increase value for all our stakeholders.

To further our initiatives, our Board has delegated oversight responsibility to our Nominating and Governance Committee over our environmental, social and governance (ESG) efforts, including those related to corporate social responsibility. Our approach to corporate social responsibility encompasses the following pillars: Philanthropy, Employees, and Sustainability. In 2020, our focus naturally shifted in response to the significant tolls the COVID-19 pandemic placed on people's lives and their financial stability as we worked to secure and promote the health, safety and well-being of our employees, customers and their patients and the communities in which we work and live. Our achievements reflect that focus.

Demonstrating our commitment to these ideals, in 2020 we:
Global Code of Conduct. We materially revised our Code to emphasize our commitment to deter wrongdoing, promote integrity and ethical conduct, and deliver superior treatment outcomes and experiences to patients
Global Speak Up Policy. We launched a new Speak Up Policy to show our commitment to conducting business ethically, honestly and legally
CSR Responsibility. We elevated the role responsible for our corporate social responsibility efforts to vice president; tasked with consolidating and organizing the myriad of worldwide initiatives underway under a common program

Philanthropy. Giving back to has always played an important role in our culture and the COVID-19 pandemic increased the need to support our community significantly in 2020. While we maintained our overall philanthropic philosophy to support organizations whose visions tie closely to our own - transforming smiles, supporting and educating teens, and advancing technology through research and other partnerships with learning institutions and/or foundations - we also focused more specifically on the immediate needs of the community, our employees, customers and their patients and healthcare workers in general. Our efforts included initiatives such as:

Donations. We launched our Align Foundation in 2020; a platform through which employees are encouraged to contribute their time, talent, and financial resources to worthy causes. The Align Foundation also provides a structured means by which significant donations are directed from a donor-advised fund overseen by Fidelity Charitable, with the flexibility to provide smaller monetary donations, processes to donate our products (the Invisalign System treatment and iTero scanners), and organized ways to involve our employees in giving activities. Align and our employees made significant donations of money, materials and time and effort in 2020.
Donated 1 million renminbi to the Chinese Red Cross Foundation to support its COVID-19 prevention and outbreak control efforts
Donated $1 million in the fight against COVID-19 to relief efforts around the world
Donated personal protective equipment ("PPE") to healthcare workers and patients in the fight against COVID-19, including dedicating a portion of our extensive custom 3-D printing manufacturing facilities to the production of PPE by converting manufacturing and tooling equipment to produce PPE and teaming with public and private organizations globally to reduce the scarcity of parts and materials needed for PPE.
57


Operation Smile - We continued our support of Operation Smile, an international medical charity that provides free surgeries to children and young adults in developing countries born with cleft lip, cleft palate or other dental and facial conditions. Consistent with our mission to transform smiles and change lives, it is a partnership that continues to grow and evolve. To date, we have donated almost $1.5 million, enabling the organization to life-saving reconstructive cleft surgeries to tens of thousands of the world's most vulnerable patients, and grow its reach to more than 60 countries.
America’s ToothFairy - The mission of America's ToothFairy is to ensure underserved children in the United States can access dental care and learn about oral health through nonprofit clinics and community partners. For more than 12 years we have supported the efforts of America’s ToothFairy by providing almost $2 million for the foundation’s operational expenses and children’s oral health programs, and in the process helped more than eight million children and their caregivers learn about preventing tooth decay and gum disease. In 2020, America’s ToothFairy, with Align's help, provided over 600,000 children with oral health education and hygiene instruction.
Month of Smiles - Month of Smiles is a dedicated month of giving when all employees are encouraged to donate their time and talent to make a difference in the lives of others. In 2020, many of our offices around the world organized community service activities that offered employees the opportunity to contribute to, to work together as teams or individuals to help others. In addition, employees took time to give back to causes that are meaningful to them through volunteer activities, personal donations and intentional acts of kindness. Our collective impact was something of which we are proud - more than 3,000 employees globally volunteered their time, gave more than 5,000 hours back to their communities, and partnered with more than 60 charitable organizations around the world during our 2020 Month of Smiles.

Employees. We believe we are at our best, and that our success is driven by, our openness and willingness to accept those with differing backgrounds, beliefs, perspectives and capabilities in our workforce. We have diversity, inclusion and belonging in our policies and practices, education and events, and executive and community programs, which in 2020 included:
Employee Survey- Every year we initiate an employee survey to gather feedback from our employees. In 2020, we incorporated additional questions to hear from our employees about their experiences and opinions around inclusion.
REACH@align - We launched a new employee resource group ("ERG") in the US and Brazil called REACH which stands for Recruitment, Education, Awareness, Cultural-diversity, and High Achievement. This ERG focuses on the professional development and recruitment of minorities, cultural awareness and diversity and inclusion efforts at Align.
Health and Safety - We implemented policies designed to keep our personnel and their families safe. Our global remote working arrangements for our non-manufacturing teams continue in place in many of our offices, with essential workers allowed into our commercial and development sites on a limited basis. For our large manufacturing workforce for which remote working is impossible, we have implemented, and provided training in the proper use and application of, significant safety protocols.
Fiscal Security - A major component of protecting the health and safety of our employees was fostering an environment in which they felt secure financially so that they so that they in turn could contribute to the well-being of their families and the economies and communities in which they live. We achieved this by openly committing to our employees at the outset that we would not layoff or furlough any employees. Additionally, we told employees that we would not be seeking pay cuts or deferrals.
Women in Leadership - Our global women@align chapters offer and encourage networking, professional development, leadership mentoring, and educational projects for all levels of employees.
Diversity and Inclusion Education and Awareness - We have education and awareness programs, focused on unconscious bias, diversity and inclusion. We also have speakers and facilitated dialogues supporting diversity and inclusion initiatives to further increase empathy and cultural awareness.
Month of Wellness - The Month of Wellness is a worldwide movement fostering employee health. The Month of Wellness provides employees with a variety of wellness activities and initiatives worldwide to support their overall well-being in areas such as nutrition, fitness, financial planning, and stress management.
Volunteer and Service Leadership - Our goal is to inspire and develop employees through serving others in the communities where they work and live. We encourage our employees to volunteer through organized company activities or on their own with volunteer time off programs for applicable employees.
In addition to our other achievements in 2020, we were also honored with numerous awards for our positive work environment and culture, most recently the Great Place to Work in Brazil along with others including:
For the second year in a row, Align was named one of the Best Places to Work in IT by Computerworld who surveyed organizations across the U.S. to identify those that provide the best benefits and amenities for IT professionals. Among the attributes contributing to the award were our training, health insurance, retirement funding, flexible time off policies, and collaborative work environments.
58


The Canadian Great Place to Work ("GPTW") program recognized Align as a top workplace in both 2019 and 2020 in the areas of Giving Back, Managed by Women, and in Healthcare. Companies were ranked based on employee responses to the GPTW Trust Index survey.
For the third year in a row, the Triangle Business Journal ("TBJ") named Align's Raleigh, North Carolina office among the Top 50 Best Places to Work in the Triangle area based on employee feedback to a TBJ survey.

Sustainability. We continue to innovate for a more sustainable future for our planet. In 2020, we remained focused on reducing our impact on the environment and our climate with efforts to reduce product packaging, recycling waste as well as decreasing waste and emissions, and increasing renewable energy usage.
We continued to open new facilities and other sites that are closer to our customers which helps us decrease carbon emitting activities from shipping our products, including fully opening our new manufacturing facility in Ziyang, China.
Suppliers are key to all aspects of our business and we chose suppliers that have sustainable business practices to serve our core business processes. Our largest shipping partner, UPS, integrates sustainability into their strategic objectives and business operations designed to reduce their environmental impact, including decreasing their green house gas emissions and waste.
We've reduced the polymer content used in our aligners by almost 50% in just over five years. In addition, the majority of all scrap/waste generated by our manufacturing processes are used for energy by an incinerator to power its operations; thereby substantially reducing the amount of waste sent to landfills.
We launched an Invisalign clear aligner recycling program, currently in a pilot phase in the U.S. and Brazil, that encourages customers and their patients to return used and unused aligners which are recycled in partnership with TerraCycle®, an innovative recycling company that has become a global leader in recycling hard-to-recycle materials.
Our Juarez, Mexico manufacturing site received recognition from the State of Chihuahua for two exemplary environmental efforts; one for environmental best practices and the other for environmental compliance. Both are a reflection of our commitment to sustainable business practices such as water reuse, waste reduction and reduced energy consumption and greenhouse gases by integrating renewable energy sources.
The use of iTero scanners reduces the need for traditional impressions and the mining of the materials used to make those impressions.
Globally, we work to reduce the environmental impact of our processes and transportation by using energy efficient building designs and controls (e.g. renewable energy, including solar panels, motion activated lights, LED lighting, etc.) and work to reduce emission from employee transportation by providing car charging stations to promote zero or low emission cars, electric vehicle car fleets, incentives for carpooling, and organizing company sponsored employee transportation. We are also in the process of eliminating single use plastics in our facilities.

Suppliers. We believe in transparent and responsible business practices, including in our relationship with those who work in our supply chain. We expect our supply partners to follow the highest standards in the industry, such as ISO 14001 and we require our suppliers to adhere to responsible sourcing. For instance, we prohibit our suppliers from profiting from the sale of tantalum, tin, tungsten, and gold ("conflict minerals") that funds conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries by requiring them to source such minerals from socially responsible suppliers. Additionally, we participate in organizations focused on conducting operations in a socially and environmentally responsible manner, including organizations that support social, environmental, and ethical responsibility globally.

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
Except as otherwise noted in the footnotes to the following table, the information contained in the table below sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 24, 20162021 by:
each stockholder known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock;
each of our named executive officers namedas set forth in the summary compensation table on page 51 of this proxy statement;
each of our directors; and
all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.group (15 persons).
Beneficial ownership is determined based on the rules of the SEC. The column captioned “Total"Total Shares Beneficially Owned”Owned" represents the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned and the number of shares of our common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable, restricted stock unitsRSUs and market stock unitsMSUs that will vest on or before May 23, 2016.2021. The number of shares subject to options that each beneficial owner has the right to acquire and restricted stock unitsRSUs and MSUs that will vest on or before May 23, 20162021 is listed separately under the column “Number"Number of Shares Underlying Options
59


Exercisable and RSUs/MSUs vesting on or before May 23, 2016.”2021." These shares are not deemed exercisable or vested for purposes of computing the percentage of shares beneficially owned by any other person. “Percentage"Percentage of Outstanding Shares Beneficially Owned”Owned" is based upon [_____________]79,135,585 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 24, 2016.2021. The address for those individuals for which an address is not otherwise provided is c/o Align Technology, Inc., 2560 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131.410 N. Scottsdale Rd. Suite 1300 Tempe, AZ 85281. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe the stockholders listed below have sole voting or investment power with respect to all shares, subject to applicable community property laws.


Name and AddressNumber of
Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Number of
Shares
Underlying
Options
Exercisable
and RSUs
vesting on or
before May 23,
2021 (1)
Total Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
The Vanguard Group (2)
7,623,829 — 7,623,829 9.7 %
BlackRock, Inc. (3)
5,436,327 — 5,436,327 6.9 %
Gordon Gund, family members and affiliated entities (4)
4,710,225 — 4,710,225 6.0 %
Edgewood Management LLC (5)
4,613,620 — 4,613,620 5.9 %
Joseph M. Hogan (6)
145,432 — 145,432 *
John F. Morici9,903 — 9,903 *
Simon Beard23,483 — 23,483 *
Julie Tay20,764 — 20,764 *
Raj Pudipeddi1,452 — 1,452 *
Kevin J. Dallas2,337 1,271 3,608 *
Joseph Lacob154,085 1,271 155,356 *
C. Raymond Larkin, Jr.32,052 1,694 33,746 *
George J. Morrow16,478 1,271 17,749 *
Anne M. Myong1,499 1,271 2,770 *
Thomas M. Prescott52,858 1,271 54,129 *
Andrea L. Saia12,487 1,271 13,758 *
Greg J. Santora11,578 1,271 12,849 *
Susan E. Siegel3,892 1,271 5,163 *
Warren S. Thaler (7)
94,199 1,271 95,470 *
All current executive officers and directors as a group (15 persons)568,606 13,133 581,739 0.7 %
 *Less than 1%
(1)Except as otherwise set forth in the footnotes below, represents shares of common stock that can be acquired upon the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units on or before May 23, 2021. This column includes the full amount of restricted stock units that will vest on or before May 23, 2021, although each executive officer will actually receive the number of shares net of the number of shares necessary to cover any applicable withholding taxes which Align will pay on their behalf.
(2)Based on a filing with the SEC on Schedule 13G/A on February 10, 2021 indicating beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. Includes shares held by direct and indirect subsidiaries. The mailing address for The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(3)Based on a filing with the SEC on Schedule 13G/A, on January 29, 2021 indicating beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. Includes shares held by direct and indirect subsidiaries. The mailing address for BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.
(4)Based on a filing with the SEC on Schedule 13G/A on February 11, 2021 indicating beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. Includes shares held in trust for immediate family members and shares held by immediate family members. The mailing address for Gordon Gund is P.O. Box 3599, Battlecreek, Michigan 49016-3599.
(5)Based on a filing with the SEC on Schedule 13G/A on February 16, 2021 indicating beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. Includes shares held by advisory clients of Edgewood Management LLC, none of whom are deemed to beneficially own more than 5% of Align's common stock. The mailing address for Edgewood Management LLC is 535 Madison Avenue, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10022.
(6)Includes 1,500 shares held by a member of the household.
62
60


61
Name and Address
Number of
Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
 
Number of
Shares
Underlying
Options
Exercisable
and RSUs
vesting on or
before May 23,
2016 (1)
 
Total Shares
Beneficially
Owned
 
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Gordon Gund, family members and affiliated entities (2)7,017,150
 
 7,017
 [___]%
BlackRock, Inc. (3)5,054,469
 
 5,054,469
 [___]%
AllianceBernstein L.P. (4)4,815,022
 
 4,815,022
 [___]%
The Vanguard Group (5)4,766,319
 
 4,766,319
 [___]%
William Blair Investment Management, LLC (6)4,028,313
 
 4,028,313
 [___]%
Joseph M. Hogan13,270
 
    
Thomas M. Prescott176,026
 13,125
 189,151
 *
David L. White11,549
   11,549
 *
Raphael S. Pascaud8,887
 5,400
 14,287
 *
Zelco Relic13,577
   13,577
 *
Roger E. George30,161
   30,161
 *
Joseph Lacob (7)644,255
 45,500
 689,755
 *
C. Raymond Larkin, Jr.70,260
 67,700
 137,960
 *
George J. Morrow40,900
 55,500
 96,400
 *
David C. Nagel25,800
 65,500
 91,300
 *
Andrea L. Saia9,067
 5,500
 14,567
 *
Greg J. Santora35,900
 5,500
 41,400
 *
Warren S. Thaler (8)141,684
 5,500
 147,184
 *
All current executive officers and directors as a group (18 persons)1,301,581
 277,250
 1,578,831
 [___]%

 *Less than 1%
(1)Except as otherwise set forth in the footnotes below, represents shares of common stock that can be acquired upon the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units on or before May 23, 2016. This column includes the full amount of restricted stock units that will vest on or before May 23, 2016, although each executive officer will actually receive the number of shares that have vested net of the number of shares necessary to cover any applicable withholding taxes which Align will pay on their behalf.
(2)Based on a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Schedule 13G/A on February 9, 2016, indicating beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2015. Includes shares held in trust for immediate family members and shares held by immediate family members. The mailing address for Gordon Gund is P.O. Box 449, Princeton, New Jersey 08542.
(3)
Based on a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Schedule 13G/A on January 25, 2016, indicating beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2015. Includes shares held by direct and indirect subsidiaries. The mailing address for BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.
(4)Based on a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Schedule 13G on February 16, 2016, indicating beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2015. The mailing address for AllianceBernstein L.P. is 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 01015.
(5)Based on a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Schedule 13G/A, on February 10, 2016, indicating beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2015. Includes shares held by direct and indirect subsidiaries. The mailing address for The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(6)Based on a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Schedule 13G on February 9, 2016, indicating beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2015. The address for William Blair Investment Management, LLC is 240 W. Adams St., Chicago, IL 60606.
(7)Includes 495,488 shares held by the Joseph S. Lacob Trust and 148,767 shares held by Lacob Children’s Trust. Principal address is 2750 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025.

63


(8)Includes 53,100 shares held by Mr. Thaler and 88,584 shares held by The Thaler Family Trust, for the benefit of family members, as to which Mr. Thaler disclaims beneficial ownership.

64


DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEREPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms that we have received, or written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2015,2020, all executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all applicable filing requirements.requirements, except as follows: Ms. Jennifer Olson had late Forms 5 which were corrected in a filing on May 22, 2020.

62


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons
Our Board has adopted a Global Code of Business Conduct and Ethics("Code") that is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of Align, including Align’sour principal executive officer, principal financial officer and controller. TheUnder the Code provides in writing, that Align discourages itsand pursuant to our other policies and procedures, we encourage our directors, officers and employees fromto avoid actual or potential conflicts of interest, including by discouraging conducting company business with a relative or significant other, or with a business in which an employee, a relative or significant other is associated in any significant role (each a “Related Party”"Related Party"). If, however, such a Related Party transaction is unavoidable, the Code provides that all employees (other than theour directors and officers of Align)executive officers) must fully disclose the nature of the relationship and the transaction to their supervisor, and the Chief FinancialLegal and Regulatory Officer must approve in advance the Related Party transaction. If, however:
you are a director or officermember of Alignsenior management and you desire to enter into a transaction with a Related Party (as defined above); or
you are an employee (other than a director or officer)member of senior management) and you desire to enter into a transaction with a Related Party that the Chief FinancialLegal and Regulatory Officer (in consultation with legal counsel) has deemed to be material to Align and is reportable under the rules and regulations of the Exchange Act,
the nature of the transaction must be fully disclosed to the Audit Committee of the Board and such interesttransaction must be approved by the Audit Committee.

Related Party Transaction Disclosure:

On February 19, 2021, we entered into a sponsorship agreement with the Golden State Warriors, LLC, pursuant to which the Invisalign brand is the Official Smile Partner of the Golden State Warriors of the National Basketball Association, the Santa Cruz Warriors of the NBA G League and the Golden Guardians, an esports affiliate of the Golden State Warriors. The Company didsponsorship includes an omni-channel activation across television, digital media and social media and a jersey partnership with the Golden Guardians and the Santa Cruz Warriors. Joseph Lacob, a member of our Board, is the Co-Executive Chairman and CEO of Golden State Warriors, LLC. The cost associated with the agreement is in excess of $120,000 per year, but is not an amount that is material to Align.
63


ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
410 N. Scottsdale Rd. Suite 1300
Tempe, AZ 85281
_______________________________ 
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE
2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
__________________________________ 
GENERAL INFORMATION

Q:    Why am I receiving these materials?

A:    We have made these materials available to you via the Internet or delivered paper copies to you by mail in connection with our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders ("Annual Meeting"), which will take place online at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Wednesday, May 19, 2021. As a stockholder, you are invited to participate in the Annual Meeting via live webcast and vote on the items of business described in this proxy statement.

Q:    What is included in these materials?

A:    The proxy materials include:

this proxy statement; and
our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 ("Annual Report").

If you received a paper copy of these materials by mail, the proxy materials also include a proxy card for the Annual Meeting. If you received a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials, see "How do I vote?" below.

Q:    What information is contained in these materials?

A:    The information in this proxy statement contains important information regarding our Annual Meeting. Specifically, it:

identifies the proposals on which you are being asked to vote
provides information regarding voting procedures at the Annual Meeting
discusses our corporate governance policies and practices
describes the compensation paid to our directors and certain executive officers and
discloses other information that we are required to provide to you under applicable laws and regulations

Q:    Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the full set of proxy materials?

A:    In accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, we are making our proxy materials available over the Internet. Stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("Notice") mailed to most of our stockholders describes how you may access and review the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also provides instructions as to how you may submit your proxy via the Internet. If you received the Notice by mail and would prefer to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice.

Q:    How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?

A:     Our proxy materials are available at http://www.viewproxy.com/aligntech/2021 and will be available during the voting period at www.proxyvote.com.


Q:    Can I vote my shares by filling out and returning the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?

A:     No. The Notice only identifies the items to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. You cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions as to how to cast your vote.

64


Q:    What is the difference between holding shares directly or as a beneficial owner, in street name?

A:    Most of our stockholders hold their shares as beneficial owners through a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee. As summarized below, there are some differences between shares held directly (of record) and those owned beneficially.

    Stockholder of Record: If on the Record Date your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Limited, then you are considered the "stockholder of record." As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy.

    Beneficial Owner: If on the Record Date your shares were held on your behalf in an account with a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, the brokerage firm, bank or other nominee is considered the stockholder of record of your shares and you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares held in "street name." If you are a beneficial owner, these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by the organization considered the stockholder of record of your shares. As a beneficial owner, you may direct your nominee as to how to vote your shares. Your nominee should have enclosed or provided voting instructions for you to use directing it as to how to vote your shares. Please note that as a beneficial owner, you may not vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from the organization that is your nominee holding your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.

VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

Q:    How can I participate in the Annual Meeting?

A:    Our Annual Meeting will again be an entirely virtual meeting conducted via live webcast. The Annual Meeting webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Wednesday, May 19, 2021. Online access will begin at 9:30 a.m., Pacific Time, and we encourage you to access the Annual Meeting early.

To be admitted to the Annual Meeting, stockholders as of the Record Date must register in advance at http://viewproxy.com/aligntech/2021/htype.asp

Registered Stockholders: Stockholders who hold shares in their own name or have received a Notice or proxy card must click "Registration for Registered Holders" and enter their name, phone number, Virtual Control Number (found on your Notice or proxy card) and email address.

• "Street name" or Beneficial Stockholders: Stockholders who hold shares through a bank, broker, or other similar agent, must click "Registration for Beneficial Holders" and enter their name, phone number and email, and click submit. Thereafter, please email a copy of your legal proxy or proof of ownership that you obtain from your bank or broker to Virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com. If you are unable to obtain a legal proxy to vote your shares, you will still be able to attend the 2021 annual meeting (but will not be able to vote your shares) so long as you demonstrate proof of stock ownership. Instructions on how to connect and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at http://viewproxy.com/aligntech/2021/htype.asp.

Q:    Why is the Annual Meeting only virtual?

A:    For the health and well-being of our stockholders, employees, officers, directors and their families as well as the communities in which we live and work, we have again chosen to conduct the Annual Meeting in a virtual-only meeting format, via live audio webcast. A virtual meeting provides a convenient and efficient means to administer our Annual Meeting while allowing stockholders to safely participate from any related party transactions in 2015.location around the world.

Q:    How can I submit questions during the Annual Meeting?

A:    During registration and also the Annual Meeting, you may submit questions pertaining to the business of the Annual Meeting according to instructions to be provided either during registration or the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, each stockholder will be limited to one question. Questions pertinent to the business of the Annual Meeting will be read aloud and answered, subject to time constraints, after the end of the business portion of the Annual Meeting.

Q:    What are the rules of procedure for the Annual Meeting?

A:    The rules and procedures for the Annual Meeting will be available at http://viewproxy.com/aligntech/2021/htype.asp.

65

Q:    Will the list of Contentsstockholders be available during the Annual Meeting?

A:    During the Annual Meeting, the list of our stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for viewing by stockholders as of the Record Date upon request, for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting.

Q:    What if I have technical difficulties or trouble accessing the Annual Meeting?

A:    We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you experience accessing the Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties, please call:

866-612-8937(toll-free)
973-873-7684 (international)

VOTING INFORMATION

Q:    Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

A:    If you are a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner who owned our common stock at the close of business on March 24, 2021, the record date for the Annual Meeting ("Record Date"), you are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, 79,135,585 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding and no shares of our preferred stock were issued and outstanding.

Q:    How do I vote my shares during the Annual Meeting?

A:    By logging into the webcast, Registered Stockholders will be able to vote electronically on all proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting. Please note, Beneficial Stockholders must submit a copy of their legal proxy or proof of ownership in advance toVirtualmeeting@viewproxy.comin order to vote their shares during the Annual Meeting.

Even if you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting online, we recommend that you also vote by proxy as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to participate.

Q:    How can I vote my shares without participating in the Annual Meeting?

A:    Internet. You may vote over the Internet by following the instructions on the Notice. Stockholders who receive printed proxy materials may vote over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card. Most of Align’s stockholders who hold shares beneficially in street name may vote by accessing the website specified in the voting instructions provided by their broker, bank or other nominee. A number of banks and brokerage firms are participating in a program provided through Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions that offers the means to vote their shares through the Internet. If your shares are held in an account with a participating broker or bank, you may grant a proxy to vote those shares via the Internet by contacting the website shown on the instruction form received from your broker or bank. To be counted at the Annual Meeting, your vote must be received by 8:59 p.m. Pacific Time, on May 18, 2021.

    Telephone. Stockholders of record may vote by following the “Vote by Telephone” instructions on their Notice or on their proxy cards until 8:59 p.m. Pacific Time, on May 18, 2021.
    Mail. If you requested printed proxy materials, you can submit your vote by completing, signing and dating the proxy card mailed to you and returning it in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope. Proxy cards must be received prior to the closing of the polls at the Annual Meeting in order for the votes to be recorded.

Q:    What if I don’t give specific voting instructions?

A:    In the election of directors, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” If you elect to “ABSTAIN” in the election of directors, the abstention will not impact the election of directors. In tabulating the voting results for the election of directors, only "FOR" and "AGAINST" votes are counted.

        For the other items of business, you may vote "FOR", "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN". For these other items of business, if you elect to abstain, the abstention will have the same effect as an "AGAINST" vote.

    If you indicate your choice on your proxy on a particular matter to be acted upon, the shares will be voted as indicated.

66


    If you are a stockholder of record and you return a signed proxy card but do not indicate how you wish to vote, the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by the Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If you do not return the proxy card, your shares will not be voted and will not be deemed present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists.

If you are a beneficial owner and the nominee organization holding your shares does not receive instructions from you as to how to vote those shares, under the rules of various national and regional securities exchanges, that organization may exercise discretionary authority to vote on routine proposals (the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") as our independent public accountants) but may not vote on non-routine proposals (each of the other proposals). We encourage you to provide instructions to your broker regarding the voting of your shares.

If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker and the broker has indicated that it does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular proposal, your shares will be considered “broker non-votes” with regard to that matter. Broker non-votes will be considered as represented for purposes of determining a quorum but generally will not be considered as entitled to vote with respect to a particular proposal. Broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast with respect to a particular proposal. Thus, a broker non-vote will make a quorum more readily obtainable, but the broker non-vote will not otherwise affect the outcome of the vote on a proposal that requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote. For proposal 3 which requires 66 2/3% of the Outstanding Shares of Voting Stock to vote "FOR", a broker non-vote will have the same effect as an "AGAINST" vote.

Q:    Can I change or revoke my vote?

A:    You may change your proxy voting instructions at any time before your votes are cast at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a stockholder of record, you may either:
grant a new proxy bearing a later date by following the instructions provided in the Notice or the proxy card, which will automatically revoke the previous proxy;
provide written notice of the revocation to:
Corporate Secretary
Align Technology, Inc.
410 N. Scottsdale Rd. Suite 1300
Tempe, AZ 85281
prior to the time we take the vote at the Annual Meeting; or
participate in the Annual Meeting and vote. Your presence at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically request that it be revoked.
If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may either:
timely submit new voting instructions to your broker or other nominee; or
if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker or other nominee giving you the right to vote your shares during the Annual Meeting, participate in the Annual Meeting and vote online.
67



Q:    What are we voting on and what vote is required to approve each item?

A:    The proposals that will be presented at the Annual Meeting, the vote required for passage of each, our Board's voting recommendations, and the way the vote is calculated for the proposals are as follows:
PROPOSALVote RequiredBoard's Voting RecommendationBroker Discretionary Voting Allowed?
Proposal 1 — To Elect 10 Director NomineesA nominee must receive more "for" votes than "against" votes and the number of votes "for" must be the majority of the required quorumFORNO
Proposal 2 — To Ratify the Appointment of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2021Majority of Shares Entitled to Vote and Present in Person or Represented by ProxyFORYES
Proposal 3 — To Ratify an Amendment of our Bylaws to designate Delaware and the District Courts of the United States as the Exclusive Forums for adjudication of certain disputes66 2/3% of the Outstanding Shares of Voting Stock, meaning Common Shares OutstandingFORNO
Proposal 4 - To Approve the amendment and restatement of our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase PlanMajority of Shares Entitled to Vote and Present in Person or Represented by ProxyFORNO
Proposal 5 - To Consider an Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive OfficersMajority of Shares Entitled to Vote and Present in Person or Represented by ProxyFORNO

    We will also consider any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting. As of [●], we are not aware of any other matters to be submitted for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy cards will vote the shares they represent using their best judgment.

Q:    What constitutes a quorum?

A:    A quorum, which is a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the Record Date, must be present or represented by proxy in order to hold the Annual Meeting and to conduct business. As of the Record Date, 79,135,585 shares of common stock, representing the same number of votes, were outstanding. That means that we need the holders of at least 39,567,793 shares of common stock to be represented for us to have a quorum. Your shares will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you attend the Annual Meeting in person. Your shares will be considered present and represented by proxy if you submit a properly executed proxy card or vote via the Internet or by telephone. Under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, abstentions and broker “non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote and so are included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.

If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the Annual Meeting, then either the chairman of the Annual Meeting or the stockholders by vote of the holders of a majority of the stock having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting are authorized by our Bylaws to adjourn the Annual Meeting until a quorum is present or represented.

Q:    Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?

A:    We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of proxy materials, and making the proxy materials and voting options available online and by phone. The original solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone and other means by directors, and employees of Align. None of these officers, directors or employees will receive special compensation for such services. In addition, we may reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding these proxy materials to you and establishing and administering the Annual Meeting.

68


Q:    Who will count the vote?

A:    We expect a representative from Align will tabulate the proxies and act as inspector of the election.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Q:    What is Align’s website address?

A.    Our website address is www.aligntech.com. We make this proxy statement, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, available on our website in the Investors section, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

    This information is also available free of charge at www.sec.gov, an Internet site maintained by the SEC that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that are filed electronically with the SEC. Stockholders may obtain free copies of the documents filed with the SEC by contacting our Investor Relations department by sending a written request to Align Technology, Inc., 410 N. Scottsdale Rd. Suite 1300 Tempe, AZ 85281, Attn: Investor Relations or by sending an email to investorinfo@aligntech.com.

Q:    Where can I find the voting results of the meeting?

A:    We expect to announce preliminary results at the Annual Meeting. The final results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we expect to file with the SEC by May 25, 2021.

Q:    What if multiple stockholders share the same address?

A:     To reduce expenses, we are delivering a single copy of the Notice and, if applicable, the proxy materials to certain stockholders who share a single address, unless otherwise requested by one of the stockholders. A separate proxy card is included in the voting materials for each of these stockholders. To receive a separate copy of the Notice and, if applicable, the proxy materials you may contact us by calling (408) 470-1000 or by writing to us at Align Technology, Inc., 410 N. Scottsdale Rd. Suite 1300 Tempe, AZ 85281, Attn:  Investor Relations. You may also contact us by calling or writing if you would like to receive separate materials for future annual meetings.

Q:    Is there any information that I should know regarding future annual meetings?

A:    Stockholder proposals that timely satisfy the conditions set forth in SEC regulations under Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials may be included in our proxy statement for an annual meeting. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we must receive the proposal at our principal executive offices, addressed to the Corporate Secretary, no later than December 6, 2021. A stockholder proposal that is not intended for inclusion in our proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 may be brought before the 2022 Annual Meeting so long as we receive information and notice of the proposal in compliance with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws, addressed to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, not later than February 19, 2022 nor earlier than January 20, 2022.
69


OTHER MATTERS
We know of no other matters to be submitted at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy card to vote the shares they represent as the Board may recommend or, if the Board has not provided a recommendation, in accordance with their own judgment.
It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. You are, therefore, urged to mark, sign, date, and return the accompanying proxy card as promptly as possible in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
April [__], 2016[●]


66
70


proxycard1a.jpg



APPENDIX Aproxycard21a.jpg
Reconciliation Non-GAAP to GAAP page vi and 45 of the Proxy Statement
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Profit from Operations
(in thousands)proxycard31a.jpg
 Year Ended
 
December 31,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
GAAP Profit from Operations$144,020
 $193,576
 $94,212
       Impairment of goodwill (1)

 
 40,693
       Impairment of long lived assets (2)

 
 26,320
Non-GAAP Profit from Operations$144,020
 $193,576
 $161,225
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Net Profit     
(in thousands, except per share amounts)     
 Year Ended
 
December 31,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
GAAP Net profit$144,020
 $145,832
 $64,295
Impairment of goodwill (1)

 
 40,693
       Impairment of long lived assets (2)

 
 26,320
Tax effect on non-GAAP adjustments (3)

 
 (3,788)
Non-GAAP Net profit$144,020
 $145,832
 $127,520
GAAP net profit per diluted share$1.77
 $1.77
 $0.78
Non-GAAP net profit per diluted share$1.77
 $1.77
 $1.54
Shares used in computing diluted GAAP net profit per share81,521
 82,283
 82,589
Shares used in computing diluted non-GAAP net profit per share81,521
 82,283
 82,589



(1)
Impairment of goodwill. This charge represents non-cash write-downs of our goodwill. During the third quarter of 2012, we determined that there were sufficient indicators such as the termination of our distribution agreement with Straumann for iTero intra-oral scanners as well as the market conditions and business trends within our Scanners and Services ("Scanner") reporting unit for an impairment of goodwill. In the first quarter of 2013, changes in the competitive environment for intra-oral scanners, including announcements from our competitors of new low-priced scanners targeted at orthodontists and general practitioner dentists in North America, caused us to lower our expectations for growth and profitability for our Scanner reporting unit which resulted in the impairment of our remaining Scanner goodwill. We remove the impact of these charges to our operating performance to assist in assessing our ability to generate cash from operations. We believe this may be useful information to users of our financial statements and therefore we have excluded these charges for purposes of calculating these non-GAAP measures to facilitate an evaluation of our current operating performance, particularly in terms of liquidity.
(2 ) Impairment of long lived assets. This charge represents non-cash write downs of our long lived assets. In the first quarter of 2013, changes in the competitive environment for intra-oral scanners, including announcements from our competitors of new low-priced scanners targeted at orthodontists and general practitioner dentists in North America, caused us to lower our expectations for growth and profitability for our Scanner reporting unit which resulted in the impairment of our Scanner intangible assets for $19.3 million and plant and equipment for $7.0 million.
(3) Income tax-related adjustments. Non-GAAP financial information for the quarter is adjusted for a tax rate equal to our annual estimated tax rate on non-GAAP income. This rate is based on our estimated annual GAAP income tax rate forecast, adjusted to account for discrete tax items and items excluded from GAAP income in calculating the non-GAAP financial measures presented above. Our estimated tax rate on non-GAAP income is determined annually and may be re-calculated during the year to take into account events or trends that we believe materially impact the estimated annual rate.




A-1


Reconciliation of 2015 Adjusted Non-GAAP Profit from Operations used for Company Multiplier on page 45 of the Proxy Statement
(in thousands)
GAAP Profit from Operations$144,020
Foreign Exchange impact on FY15 operating expenses11,000
Additional Aligner deferral on FY15 revenues14,000
Organizational costs on FY15 operating expenses4,000
Stock-based compensation52,943
Medical Device Excise Tax(4)
(6,800)
Other one-time adjustment (5)
4,400
Adjusted Non-GAAP Profit from Operations for Company Multiplier$223,563
(4) Medical Device Excise tax ("MDET"): During March 2014, it was determined that our Aligners are not subject to the MDET. Prior to this determination, MDET expense was included in our 2014 target for Adjusted Operating Income. As a result, the Compensation Committee determined to exclude the beneficial impact of not paying MDET since it would have resulted in an unintended gain to the Company Multiplier.
(5) Other one-time adjustment: This charge relates to our enterprise resource planning (ERP) software.


A-2




ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
2005 INCENTIVE PLAN
(as amended and restated May 16, 2016)
1.Purposes of the Plan. The purposes of this Plan are:
to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility,
to provide incentives to individuals who perform services to the Company, and
to promote the success of the Company’s business.
The Plan permits the grant of Incentive Stock Options, Nonstatutory Stock Options, Restricted Stock, SARs, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, Performance Shares and other stock or cash awards as the Administrator may determine.

2.Definitions. As used herein, the following definitions will apply:
(a)Administrator” means the Board or any of its Committees as will be administering the Plan, in accordance with Section 4 of the Plan.
(b)Affiliate” means any corporation or any other entity (including, but not limited to, partnerships and joint ventures) controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Company.
(c)Applicable Laws” means the legal and regulatory requirements relating to the administration of equity-based awards, including but not limited to U.S. federal and state corporate laws, U.S. federal and state securities laws, the Code, any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted and the applicable laws of any non-U.S. country or jurisdiction where Awards are, or will be, granted under the Plan.
(d)Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under the Plan of Options, Restricted Stock, SARs, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, Performance Shares and other stock or cash awards as the Administrator may determine.
(e)Award Agreement” means the written or electronic agreement setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to each Award granted under the Plan. The Award Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
(f)Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
(g)Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i)A change in the ownership of the Companywhich occurs on the date that any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (“Person”), acquires ownership of the stock of the Company that, together with the stock held by such Person, constitutes more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the stock of the Company; provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection (i), the acquisition of additional stock by any one Person, who is considered to own more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the stock of the Company will not be considered a Change in Control. Further, if the shareholders of the Company immediately before such change in ownership continue to retain immediately after the change in ownership, in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of shares of the Company’s voting stock immediately prior to the change in ownership, direct or indirect beneficial ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the total voting power of the stock of the Company or of the ultimate parent entity of the Company, such event shall not be considered a Change in Control under this subsection (i). For this purpose, indirect beneficial ownership shall include, without limitation, an interest resulting from ownership of the voting securities of one or more corporations or other business entities which own the Company, as the case may be, either directly or through one or more subsidiary corporations or other business entities; or
(ii)A change in the effective control of the Company which occurs on the date that a majority of members of the Board is replaced during any twelve (12)-month period by Directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board prior to the date of the appointment or election. For purposes of this subsection (ii), if any Person is considered to be in effective control of the Company, the acquisition of additional control of the Company by the same Person will not be considered a Change in Control; or
(iii)A change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets which occurs on the date that any Person acquires (or has acquired during the twelve (12)‑month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than fifty percent (50%) of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions; provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection (iii), the following will not constitute a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets: (A) a transfer to an entity that is controlled by the Company’s shareholders immediately after the transfer, or (B) a transfer of assets by the Company to: (1) a shareholder of the Company (immediately before the asset transfer) in exchange for or with respect to the Company’s stock, (2) an entity, fifty percent (50%) or more of the total value or voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company, (3) a Person, that owns, directly or indirectly, fifty percent (50%) or more of the total value or voting power of all the outstanding stock of the Company, or (4) an entity, at least fifty percent (50%) of the total value or voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by a Person described

B-1


in this subsection (iii)(B)(3). For purposes of this subsection (iii), gross fair market value means the value of the assets of the Company, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets.
For purposes of this definition, persons will be considered to be acting as a group if they are owners of a corporation that enters into a merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of stock, or similar business transaction with the Company.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a transaction will not be deemed a Change in Control unless the transaction qualifies as a change in control event within the meaning of Code Section 409A, as it has been and may be amended from time to time, and any proposed or final Treasury Regulations and Internal Revenue Service guidance that has been promulgated or may be promulgated thereunder from time to time.
Further and for the avoidance of doubt, a transaction will not constitute a Change in Control if: (i) its sole purpose is to change the state of the Company’s incorporation, or (ii) its sole purpose is to create a holding company that will be owned in substantially the same proportions by the persons who held the Company’s securities immediately before such transaction.
(h)Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Any reference to a section of the Code or Treasury Regulation promulgated thereunder shall include such section or regulation, any valid regulation promulgated under such section, and any comparable provision of any future legislation or regulation amending, supplementing or superseding such section or regulation.
(i)Committee” means a committee of Directors or of other individuals satisfying Applicable Laws appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 4 hereof.
(j)Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company.
(k)Company” means Align Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation, or any successor thereto.
(l)Consultant” means any natural person, including an advisor, engaged by the Company or a Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate to render bona fide services to such entity, provided the services (i) are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and (ii) do not directly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities, in each case, within the meaning of Form S-8 promulgated under the Securities Act, and provided, further, that a Consultant will include only those persons to whom the issuance of Shares may be registered under Form S-8 promulgated under the Securities Act.
(m)Determination Date” means the latest possible date that will not jeopardize the qualification of an Award granted under the Plan as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.
(n)Director” means a member of the Board.
(o)Disability” means total and permanent disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, provided that in the case of Awards other than Incentive Stock Options, the Administrator in its discretion may determine whether a permanent and total disability exists in accordance with uniform and non-discriminatory standards adopted by the Administrator from time to time.
(p)Employee” means any person, including Officers and Directors, employed by the Company or its Affiliates. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company will be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company.
(q)Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(r)Exchange Program” means a program under which (i) outstanding Awards are surrendered or cancelled in exchange for awards of the same type (which may have higher or lower exercise prices and different terms), Awards of a different type, and/or cash, (ii) Participants would have the opportunity to transfer any outstanding Awards to a financial institution or other person or entity selected by the Administrator, and/or (iii) the exercise price of an outstanding Award is increased or reduced.
(s)Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock as the Administrator may determine in good faith by reference to the price of such stock on any established stock exchange or a national market system on the day of determination if the Common Stock is so listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system. If the Common Stock is not listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, the value of the Common Stock as the Administrator may determine in good faith.
(t)Fiscal Year” means the fiscal year of the Company.
(u)Incentive Stock Option” means an Option that by its terms qualifies and is otherwise intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
(v)Inside Director” means a Director who is an Employee.
(w)Misconduct” means the commission of any act of fraud, embezzlement or dishonesty by the Participant, any unauthorized use or disclosure by such person of confidential information or trade secrets of the Company or its Affiliates, or any other intentional misconduct by such person adversely affecting the business or affairs of the Company or its Affiliates in a material manner. The foregoing definition will not in any way preclude or restrict the right of the Company or its Affiliates to

B-2


discharge or dismiss any Participant for any other acts or omissions, but such other acts or omissions will not be deemed, for purposes of the Plan, to constitute grounds for termination for Misconduct.
(x)Nonstatutory Stock Option” means an Option that by its terms does not qualify or is not intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.
(y)Officer” means a person who is an officer of the Company within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
(z)Option” means a stock option granted pursuant to the Plan.
(aa)Outside Director” means a Director who is not an Employee.
(ab)Parent” means a “parent corporation,” whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(e) of the Code.
(ac)Participant” means the holder of an outstanding Award.
(ad)Performance Goals” will have the meaning set forth in Section 12 of the Plan.
(ae)Performance Period” means any Fiscal Year of the Company or such other period as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion.
(af)Performance Share” means an Award denominated in Shares which may be earned in whole or in part upon attainment of performance goals or other vesting criteria as the Administrator may determine pursuant to Section 10.
(ag)Performance Unit” means an Award which may be earned in whole or in part upon attainment of performance goals or other vesting criteria as the Administrator may determine and which may be settled for cash, Shares or other securities or a combination of the foregoing pursuant to Section 10.
(ah)Period of Restriction” means the period during which the transfer of Shares of Restricted Stock are subject to restrictions and therefore, the Shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Such restrictions may be based on the passage of time, continued service, the achievement of target levels of performance, or the occurrence of other events as determined by the Administrator.
(ai)Plan” means this 2005 Incentive Plan, as may be amended from time to time.
(aj)Restricted Stock” means Shares issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock award under Section 7 of the Plan, or issued pursuant to the early exercise of an Option.
(ak)Restricted Stock Unit” means a bookkeeping entry representing an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of one Share, granted pursuant to Section 9. Each Restricted Stock Unit represents an unfunded and unsecured obligation of the Company.
(al)Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act or any successor to Rule 16b-3, as in effect when discretion is being exercised with respect to the Plan.
(am)Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(an)Section 16(b)” means Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
(ao)Section 409A” means Section 409A of the Code and the final regulations and any guidance promulgated thereunder, as may be amended from time to time.
(ap)Service Provider” means an Employee, Director or Consultant.
(aq)Share” means a share of the Common Stock, as adjusted in accordance with Section 18 of the Plan.
(ar)Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means an Award, granted alone or in connection with an Option, that pursuant to Section 8 is designated as a SAR.
(as)Subsidiary” means a “subsidiary corporation,” whether now or hereafter exist-ing, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.

3.Stock Subject to the Plan.
(a)Stock Subject to the Plan. Subject to the provisions of Section 18 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be awarded and sold under the Plan is 30,398,863 Shares. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.
(b)Full Value Awards. Any Shares subject to Options or SARs will be counted against the numerical limits of this Section 3 as one Share for every Share subject thereto. Any Shares subject to Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares or Performance Units with a per Share or unit purchase price lower than 100% of Fair Market Value on the date of grant that were granted prior to May 16, 2013, will be counted against the numerical limits of this Section 3 as one and one-half (1 ½) Shares for every one (1) Share subject thereto. To the extent that a Share that was subject to an Award that counted as one and one-half (1 ½) Shares against the Plan Share reserve pursuant to the preceding sentence is recycled back into the Plan under Section 3(c) below, the Plan will be credited with one and one-half (1 ½) Shares.
Any Shares subject to Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares or Performance Units with a per Share or unit purchase price lower than 100% of Fair Market Value on the date of grant that were granted on or after May 16, 2013, will be counted against the numerical limits of this Section 3 as one and nine-tenths (1.9) Shares for every one (1) Share subject thereto. To the extent that a Share that was subject to an Award that counted as one and nine-tenths (1.9) Shares against

B-3


the Plan Share reserve pursuant to the preceding sentence is recycled back into the Plan under Section 3(c) below, the Plan will be credited with one and nine-tenths (1.9) Shares.
(c)Lapsed Awards. If an Award expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full or, with respect to an Award of Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units or Performance Shares, is terminated due to failure to vest, the unpurchased Shares (or for Awards other than Options or SARs, the unissued Shares) which were subject thereto will become available for future grant or sale under the Plan (unless the Plan has terminated). Upon the exercise of a SAR settled in Shares, the gross number of Shares covered by the portion of the Award so exercised (i.e., Shares actually issued pursuant to a SAR, as well as the Shares that represent payment of the exercise price and any applicable tax withholdings) will cease to be available under the Plan. Shares that have actually been issued under the Plan under any Award will not be returned to the Plan and will not become available for future distribution under the Plan; provided, however, that if Shares issued pursuant to Awards of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares or Performance Units are repurchased by the Company or are forfeited to the Company due to failure to vest, such Shares will become available for future grant under the Plan. Shares used to pay the exercise or purchase price of an Award and/or to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to an Award will not become available for future grant or sale under the Plan. To the extent an Award under the Plan is paid out in cash rather than Shares, such cash payment will not result in reducing the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing and, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 18, the maximum number of Shares that may be issued upon the exercise of Incentive Stock Options will equal the aggregate Share number stated in Section 3(a), plus, to the extent allowable under Section 422 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, any Shares that become available for issuance under the Plan under this Section 3(c).
(d)Share Reserve. The Company, during the term of this Plan, will at all times reserve and keep available such number of Shares as will be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.
(e)Outside Director Award Limitations. No Outside Director may be granted in any Fiscal Year Awards that exceed the lesser of (i) Awards covering 100,000 Shares or (ii) Awards with a grant date fair value (determined in accordance with GAAP) of greater than $1,000,000. Any Awards granted to an individual while he or she was an Employee, or while he or she was a Consultant but not an Outside Director, shall not count for purposes of this limitation. The foregoing limitation will be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization as described in Section 18.

4.Administration of the Plan.
(a)Procedure.
(i)Multiple Administrative Bodies. Different Committees with respect to different groups of Service Providers may administer the Plan.
(ii)Section 162(m). To the extent that the Administrator determines it to be desirable to qualify Awards granted hereunder as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan will be administered by a Committee of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.
(iii)Rule 16b-3. To the extent desirable to qualify transactions hereunder as exempt under Rule 16b-3, the transactions contemplated hereunder will be structured to satisfy the requirements for exemption under Rule 16b-3.
(iv)Other Administration. Other than as provided above, the Plan will be administered by (A) the Board or (B) a Committee, which committee will be constituted to satisfy Applicable Laws.
(b)Powers of the Administrator. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, and in the case of a Committee, subject to the specific duties delegated by the Board to such Committee, the Administrator will have the authority, in its discretion:
(i)to determine the Fair Market Value;
(ii)to select the Service Providers to whom Awards may be granted hereunder;
(iii)to determine the number of Shares to be covered by each Award granted hereunder;
(iv)to approve forms of Award Agreements for use under the Plan;
(v)to determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any Award granted hereunder. Such terms and conditions include, but are not limited to, the exercise price, the time or times when Awards may be exercised (which may be based on performance criteria), any vesting acceleration or waiver of forfeiture restrictions, and any restriction or limitation regarding any Award or the Shares relating thereto, based in each case on such factors as the Administrator will determine;
(vi)to construe and interpret the terms of the Plan and Awards granted pursuant to the Plan;
(vii)to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, including rules and regulations relating to sub-plans established for the purpose of satisfying applicable foreign laws or for qualifying for favorable tax treatment under applicable foreign laws;
(viii)to modify or amend each Award (subject to Section 23(c) of the Plan) including, without limitation, the discretionary authority to extend the post‑termination exercisability period of Awards longer than is otherwise provided for in the Plan. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, the Administrator shall not institute an Exchange Program;
(ix)to allow Participants to satisfy withholding tax obligations in such manner as prescribed in Section 19;

B-4


(x)to authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument required to effect the grant of an Award previously granted by the Administrator;
(xi)to allow a Participant to defer the receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to such Participant under an Award pursuant to such procedures as the Administrator may determine;
(xii)to grant in addition to the incentives described in Sections 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 below, other incentives payable in cash or Shares under the Plan as determined by the Administrator to be in the best interests of the Company and subject to any terms and conditions the Administrator deems advisable; and
(xiii)to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for administering the Plan.
(c)Effect of Administrator’s Decision. The Administrator’s decisions, determinations and interpretations will be final and binding on all Participants and any other holders of Awards and will be given the maximum deference permitted by Applicable Laws.
(d)No Liability. Under no circumstances will the Company, its Affiliates, the Administrator, or the Board incur liability for any indirect, incidental, consequential or special damages (including lost profits) of any form incurred by any person, whether or not foreseeable and regardless of the form of the act in which such a claim may be brought, with respect to the Plan or the Company’s, its Affiliates’, the Administrator’s or the Board’s roles in connection with the Plan.

5.Eligibility. Nonstatutory Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, Performance Shares and such other cash or stock awards as the Administrator determines may be granted to Service Providers. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company.

6.Stock Options. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, an Option may be granted to Service Providers at any time and from time to time as will be determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion.
(a)Limitations.
(i)Each Option will be designated in the Award Agreement as either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option. However, notwithstanding such designation, to the extent that the aggregate fair market value of the Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by the Participant during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company and any Parent or Subsidiary) exceeds $100,000, the portion of the Options falling within such limit will be Incentive Stock Options and the excess Options will be treated as Nonstatutory Stock Options. For purposes of this Section 6(a), Incentive Stock Options will be taken into account in the order in which they were granted. The fair market value of the Shares will be determined as of the time the Option with respect to such Shares is granted.
(ii)Subject to Section 3(e), the following limitations will apply to grants of Options:
(1)No Service Provider will be granted, in any Fiscal Year, Options or SARs to purchase more than 1,000,000 Shares.
(2)In connection with his or her initial service, a Service Provider may be granted Options or SARs to purchase an aggregate of up to an additional 1,000,000 Shares, which will not count against the limit set forth in Section 6(a)(ii)(1) above.
(3)The foregoing limitations will be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization as described in Section 18.
(4)If an Option or SAR is cancelled in the same Fiscal Year in which it was granted (other than in connection with a transaction described in Section 18), the cancelled Option or SAR, as applicable, will be counted against the limits set forth in subsections (1) and (2) above. For this purpose, if the exercise price of an Option or SAR is reduced, the transaction will be treated as a cancellation of the Option or SAR, as applicable, and the grant of a new Option or SAR, as applicable.
(b)Term of Option. The term of each Option will be seven (7) years from the date of grant or such shorter term as may be provided in the Award Agreement as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion. Moreover, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Participant who, at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary, the term of the Incentive Stock Option will be five (5) years from the date of grant or such shorter term as may be provided in the Award Agreement.
(c)Option Exercise Price and Consideration.
(i)Exercise Price. The per Share exercise price for the Shares to be issued pursuant to exercise of an Option will be determined by the Administrator, subject to the following:
(1)In the case of an Incentive Stock Option
(A)granted to an Employee who, at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary, the per Share exercise price will be no less than 110% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.

B-5


(B)granted to any Employee other than an Employee described in paragraph (1) immediately above, the per Share exercise price will be no less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.
(2)In the case of a Nonstatutory Stock Option, the per Share exercise price will be determined by the Administrator, but will be no less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.
(3)Notwithstanding the foregoing, Options may be granted with a per Share exercise price of less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant pursuant to a transaction described in, and in a manner consistent with, Section 424(a) of the Code.
(ii)Waiting Period and Exercise Dates. At the time an Option is granted, the Administrator will fix the period within which the Option may be exercised and will determine any con-ditions that must be satisfied before the Option may be exercised.
(iii)Option Agreement. Each Option grant will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that will specify the exercise price, the term of the Option, the acceptable forms of consideration for exercise (which may include any form of consideration permitted by Section 6(c)(iv), the conditions of exercise, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, will determine.
(iv)Form of Consideration. The Administrator will determine the acceptable form(s) of consideration for exercising an Option, including the method of payment, to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option, the Administrator will determine the acceptable form of consideration at the time of grant.
(d)Exercise of Option.
(i)Procedure for Exercise; Rights as a Stockholder. Any Option granted hereunder will be exercisable according to the terms of the Plan and at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Administrator and set forth in the Award Agreement. An Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a Share.
An Option will be deemed exercised when the Company receives: (i) notice of exercise (in such form as the Administrator specifies from time to time) from the person entitled to exercise the Option, and (ii) full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Option is exercised (together with applicable tax withholdings). Full payment may consist of any consideration and method of payment authorized by the Administrator and permitted by the Award Agreement and the Plan. No adjustment will be made for a dividend or other right for which the record date is prior to the date the Shares are issued, except as provided in Section 18 of the Plan.
(ii)Termination of Relationship as a Service Provider other than Death, Disability or Misconduct. If a Participant ceases to be a Service Provider, other than upon the Participant’s termination as a result of the Participant’s death, Disability or Misconduct, the Participant may exercise his or her Option within such period of time as is specified in the Award Agreement to the extent that the Option is vested on the date of termination (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of such Option as set forth in the Award Agreement). In the absence of a specified time in the Award Agreement, the Option will remain exercisable for three (3) months following the Participant’s termination (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of such Option as set forth in the Award Agreement). Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, if on the date of termination the Participant is not vested as to his or her entire Option, the Shares covered by the unvested portion of the Option will revert to the Plan. If after termination the Participant does not exercise his or her Option within the time specified by the Administrator, the Option will terminate, and the Shares covered by such Option will revert to the Plan.
(iii)Disability of Participant. If a Participant ceases to be a Service Provider as a result of the Participant’s Disability, the Participant may exercise his or her Option within such period of time as is specified in the Award Agreement to the extent the Option is vested on the date of termination (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of such Option as set forth in the Award Agreement). In the absence of a specified time in the Award Agreement, the Option will remain exercisable for twelve (12) months following the Participant’s termination (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of such Option as set forth in the Award Agreement). Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, if on the date of termination the Participant is not vested as to his or her entire Option, the Shares covered by the unvested portion of the Option will revert to the Plan. If after termination the Participant does not exercise his or her Option within the time specified herein, the Option will terminate, and the Shares covered by such Option will revert to the Plan.
(iv)Death of Participant. If a Participant dies while a Service Provider, the Option may be exercised following the Participant’s death within such period of time as is specified in the Award Agreement to the extent that the Option is vested on the date of death (but in no event may the Option be exercised later than the expiration of the term of such Option as set forth in the Award Agreement), by the Participant’s designated beneficiary, provided such beneficiary has been designated prior to Participant’s death in a form acceptable to the Administrator. If no such beneficiary has been designated by the Participant, then such Option may be exercised by the personal representative of the Participant’s estate or by the person(s) to whom the Option is transferred pursuant to the Participant’s will or in accordance with the laws of descent and distribution. In the absence of a specified time in the Award Agreement, the Option will remain exercisable for twelve (12) months following Participant’s death (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of such Option as set forth in the Award Agreement). Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, if at the time of death Participant is not vested as to his or her entire Option, the Shares covered

B-6


by the unvested portion of the Option will immediately revert to the Plan. If the Option is not so exercised within the time specified herein, the Option will terminate, and the Shares covered by such Option will revert to the Plan.

7.Restricted Stock.
(a)Grant of Restricted Stock. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Administrator, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock to Service Providers in such amounts as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, will determine.
(b)Restricted Stock Agreement. Each Award of Restricted Stock will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that will specify the Period of Restriction, the number of Shares granted, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, will determine. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, for Restricted Stock intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, during any Fiscal Year no Participant will receive more than an aggregate of 500,000 Shares of Restricted Stock; provided, however, that in connection with a Participant’s initial service as an Employee, for Restricted Stock intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, an Employee may be granted an aggregate of up to an additional 500,000 Shares of Restricted Stock. The foregoing limitations will be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization as described in Section 18. Unless the Administrator determines otherwise, Shares of Restricted Stock will be held by the Company as escrow agent until the restrictions on such Shares have lapsed.
(c)Transferability. Except as provided in this Section 7, Shares of Restricted Stock may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Period of Restriction.
(d)Other Restrictions. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may impose such other restrictions on Shares of Restricted Stock as it may deem advisable or appropriate.
(e)Removal of Restrictions. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 7, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock grant made under the Plan will be released from escrow as soon as practicable after the last day of the Period of Restriction or at such other time as the Administrator may determine. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed.
(f)Voting Rights. During the Period of Restriction, Service Providers holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares, unless the Administrator determines otherwise.
(g)Dividends and Other Distributions. During the Period of Restriction, Service Providers holding Shares of Restricted Stock will be entitled to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to such Shares unless the Administrator provides otherwise. If any such dividends or distributions are paid in Shares, the Shares will be subject to the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid.
(h)Return of Restricted Stock to Company. On the date set forth in the Award Agreement, the Restricted Stock for which restrictions have not lapsed will revert to the Company and again will become available for grant under the Plan.
(i)Section 162(m) Performance Restrictions. For purposes of qualifying grants of Restricted Stock as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Administrator, in its discretion, may set restrictions based upon the achievement of Performance Goals. The Performance Goals will be set by the Administrator on or before the Determination Date. In granting Restricted Stock that is intended to qualify under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Administrator will follow any procedures determined by it from time to time to be necessary or appropriate to ensure qualification of the Award under Section 162(m) of the Code (e.g., in determining the Performance Goals).

8.Stock Appreciation Rights.
(a)Grant of SARs. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, a SAR may be granted to Service Providers at any time and from time to time as will be determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion.
(b)Number of Shares. Subject to Section 3(e), the Administrator will have complete discretion to determine the number of SARs granted to any Participant, provided that during any Fiscal Year, no Participant will be granted SARs or Options covering more than 1,000,000 Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, and subject to Section 3(e), in connection with a Participant’s initial service as an Employee, an Employee may be granted SARs or Options covering an aggregate of up to an additional 1,000,000 Shares. The foregoing limitations will be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization as described in Section 18.
(c)Exercise Price and Other Terms. The Administrator, subject to the provisions of the Plan, will have complete discretion to determine the terms and conditions of SARs granted under the Plan, provided, however, that the exercise price will be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 8(c), Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted with a per Share exercise price of less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant pursuant to a transaction described in, and in a manner consistent with, Section 424(a) of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder.
(d)SAR Agreement. Each SAR grant will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that will specify the exercise price, the term of the SAR, the conditions of exercise, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, will determine.

B-7


(e)Expiration of SARs. A SAR granted under the Plan will expire upon the date determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, and set forth in the Award Agreement; provided, however, that the term will be no more than seven (7) years from the date of grant thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the rules of Section 6(d) also will apply to SARs.
(f)Payment of SAR Amount. Upon exercise of a SAR, a Participant will be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying:
(i)The difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the exercise price; times
(ii)The number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised.
At the discretion of the Administrator, the payment upon SAR exercise may be in cash, in Shares of equivalent value, or in some combination thereof.

9.Restricted Stock Units.
(a)Grant. Subject to the terms of the Plan, Restricted Stock Units may be granted at any time and from time to time as determined by the Administrator. After the Administrator determines that it will grant Restricted Stock Units under the Plan, it will advise the Participant in an Award Agreement of the terms, conditions, and restrictions related to the grant, including the number of Restricted Stock Units. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this subsection (a), for Restricted Stock Units intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, during any Fiscal Year of the Company, no Participant will receive more than an aggregate of 500,000 Restricted Stock Units. Notwithstanding the limitation in the previous sentence, for Restricted Stock Units intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, in connection with his or her initial service as an Employee, an Employee may be granted an aggregate of up to an additional 500,000 Restricted Stock Units. The foregoing limitations will be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization as described in Section 18.
(b)Vesting Criteria and Other Terms. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Administrator will set vesting criteria in its discretion, which, depending on the extent to which the criteria are met, will determine the number of Restricted Stock Units that will be paid out to the Participant. The Administrator may set vesting criteria based upon the achievement of Company-wide, divisional, business unit, or individual goals (including, but not limited to, continued employment or service), applicable federal or state securities laws, or any other basis determined by the Administrator in its discretion.
(c)Earning Restricted Stock Units. Upon meeting the applicable vesting criteria, the Participant will be entitled to receive a payout as determined by the Administrator. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time after the grant of Restricted Stock Units, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, may reduce or waive any vesting criteria that must be met to receive a payout and may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed.
(d)Form and Timing of Payment. Payment of earned Restricted Stock Units will be made as soon as practicable after the date(s) determined by the Administrator and set forth in the Award Agreement or as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement or as required by Applicable Laws. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Restricted Stock Units in cash, Shares, or a combination thereof. Shares represented by Restricted Stock Units that are fully paid in cash again will not reduce the number of Shares available for grant under the Plan.
(e)Cancellation. On the date set forth in the Award Agreement, all unearned Restricted Stock Units will be forfeited to the Company and become available for grant under the Plan.
(f)Section 162(m) Performance Restrictions. For purposes of qualifying grants of Restricted Stock Units as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Administrator, in its discretion, may set restrictions based upon the achievement of Performance Goals. The Performance Goals will be set by the Administrator on or before the Determination Date. In granting Restricted Stock Units which are intended to qualify under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Administrator will follow any procedures determined by it from time to time to be necessary or appropriate to ensure qualification of the Award under Section 162(m) of the Code (e.g., in determining the Performance Goals).

10.Performance Units and Performance Shares.
(a)Grant of Performance Units/Shares. Subject to the terms of the Plan, Performance Units and Performance Shares may be granted to Service Providers at any time and from time to time, as will be determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion. The Administrator will have complete discretion in determining the number of Performance Units/Shares granted to each Participant provided that during any Fiscal Year, for Performance Units/Shares intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, (i) no Participant will receive Performance Units having an initial value greater than $5,000,000, and (ii) no Participant will receive more than 500,000 Performance Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, for Performance Units/Shares intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, in connection with a Participant’s initial service as an Employee, an Employee may be granted an aggregate of up to an additional 500,000 Performance Shares. The foregoing limitations will be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization as described in Section 18.
(b)Value of Performance Units/Shares. Each Performance Unit will have an initial value that is established by the Administrator on or before the date of grant. Each Performance Share will have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant.

B-8


(c)Performance Objectives and Other Terms. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Administrator will set performance objectives or other vesting provisions (including, without limitation, continued status as a Service Provider) in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the number or value of Performance Units/Shares that will be paid out to the Service Providers. Each Award of Performance Units/Shares will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that will specify the Performance Period, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, will determine. The Administrator may set performance objectives based on the achievement of Company-wide, divisional, business unit, or individual goals (including, but not limited to, continued employment or service), applicable federal or state securities laws, or any other basis determined by the Administrator in its discretion.
(d)Earning of Performance Units/Shares. After the applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Units/Shares will be entitled to receive a payout of the number of Performance Units/Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance objectives or other vesting provisions have been achieved. After the grant of a Performance Unit/Share, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, may reduce or waive any performance objectives or other vesting provisions for such Performance Unit/Share.
(e)Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Units/Shares. Payment of earned Performance Units/Shares will be made as soon as practicable after the expiration of the applicable Performance Period, or as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement or as required by Applicable Laws. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance Units/Shares in the form of cash, in Shares (which have an aggregate Fair Market Value equal to the value of the earned Performance Units/Shares at the close of the applicable Performance Period) or in a combination thereof.
(f)Cancellation of Performance Units/Shares. On the date set forth in the Award Agreement, all unearned or unvested Performance Units/Shares will be forfeited to the Company, and again will be available for grant under the Plan.
(g)Section 162(m) Performance Restrictions. For purposes of qualifying grants of Performance Units/Shares as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Administrator, in its discretion, may set restrictions based upon the achievement of Performance Goals. The Performance Goals will be set by the Administrator on or before the Determination Date. In granting Performance Units/Shares which are intended to qualify under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Administrator will follow any procedures determined by it from time to time to be necessary or appropriate to ensure qualification of the Award under Section 162(m) of the Code (e.g., in determining the Performance Goals).

11.Other Cash or Stock Awards. In addition to the incentives described in Sections 6 through 10 above, and subject to the terms of the Plan, the Administrator may grant other incentives payable in cash or Shares under the Plan as it determines to be in the best interests of the Company and subject to such other terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, provided that in any Fiscal Year, a Participant will not receive a cash Award under this Section in excess of $5,000,000.

12.Performance-Based Compensation Under Code Section 162(m).
(a)General. If the Administrator, in its discretion, decides to grant an Award intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the provisions of this Section 12 will control over any contrary provision in the Plan; provided, however, that the Administrator may in its discretion grant Awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code to such Participants that are based on Performance Goals or other specific criteria or goals but that do not satisfy the requirements of this Section 12.
(b)Performance Goals. The granting and/or vesting of Awards of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares and Performance Units and other incentives under the Plan may be made subject to the attainment of performance goals relating to one or more business criteria within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and may provide for a targeted level or levels of achievement (“Performance Goals”) including cash flow; cash position; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; earnings per Share; economic profit; economic value added; equity or stockholder’s equity; market share; net income; net profit; net sales; operating earnings; operating income; profit before tax; ratio of debt to debt plus equity; ratio of operating earnings to capital spending; return on net assets; revenue; sales growth; Share price; or total return to stockholders. Any Performance Goals may be used to measure the performance of the Company as a whole or, except with respect to shareholder return metrics, to a business unit or other segment of the Company, or one or more product lines or specific markets, and may be measured either on a growth basis or relative basis to a peer group or index. The Performance Goals may differ from Participant to Participant and from Award to Award. Prior to the Determination Date, the Administrator will determine whether to make any adjustments to the calculation of any Performance Goal with respect to any Participant for any significant or extraordinary events affecting the Company. In all other respects, Performance Goals will be calculated in accordance with the Company’s financial statements, generally accepted accounting principles, or under a methodology established by the Administrator prior to or at the time of the issuance of an Award, which is consistently applied with respect to a Performance Goal in the relevant Performance Period. In addition, the Administrator will adjust any performance criteria, Performance Goal or other feature of an Award that relates to or is wholly or partially based on the number of, or the value of, any stock of the Company, to reflect any change in the Company’s capitalization as described in Section 18.
(c)Procedures. To the extent necessary to comply with the performance-based compensation provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code, with respect to any Award granted subject to Performance Goals and intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, on or before the Determination Date (i.e., within the first

B-9


twenty-five percent (25%) of the Performance Period, but in no event more than ninety (90) days following the commencement of any Performance Period or such other time as may be required or permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code), the Administrator will, in writing, (i) designate one or more Participants to whom an Award will be made, (ii) select the Performance Goals applicable to the Performance Period, (iii) establish the Performance Goals, and amounts of such Awards, as applicable, which may be earned for such Performance Period, and (iv) specify the relationship between Performance Goals and the amounts of such Awards, as applicable, to be earned by each Participant for such Performance Period.
(d)Additional Limitations. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, any Award which is granted to a Participant and is intended to constitute qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code will be subject to any additional limitations set forth in the Code (including any amendment to Section 162(m)) or any regulations and ruling issued thereunder that are requirements for qualification as qualified performance-based compensation as described in Section 162(m) of the Code, and the Plan will be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such requirements.
(e)Determination of Amounts Earned. Following the completion of each Performance Period, the Administrator will certify in writing whether the applicable Performance Goals have been achieved for such Performance Period. A Participant will be eligible to receive payment pursuant to an Award intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code for a Performance Period only if the Performance Goals for such period are achieved. In determining the amounts earned by a Participant pursuant to an Award intended to qualified as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Administrator will have the right to (i) reduce or eliminate (but not to increase) the amount payable at a given level of performance to take into account additional factors that the Administrator may deem relevant to the assessment of individual or corporate performance for the Performance Period, (ii) determine what actual Award, if any, will be paid in the event of a termination of employment as the result of a Participant’s death or disability or upon a Change in Control or in the event of a termination of employment following a Change in Control prior to the end of the Performance Period, and (iii) determine what actual Award, if any, will be paid in the event of a termination of employment other than as the result of a Participant’s death or disability prior to a Change in Control and prior to the end of the Performance Period to the extent an actual Award would have otherwise been achieved had the Participant remained employed through the end of the Performance Period.

13.Compliance With Code Section 409A. Awards will be designed and operated in such a manner that they are either exempt from the application of, or comply with, the requirements of Code Section 409A such that the grant, payment, settlement or deferral of Awards will not be subject to the additional tax or interest applicable under Code Section 409A, except as otherwise determined in the sole discretion of the Administrator. The Plan and each Award Agreement under the Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 409A and will be construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent, except as otherwise determined in the sole discretion of the Administrator. To the extent that an Award or payment, or the settlement or deferral thereof, is subject to Code Section 409A, the Award will be granted, paid, settled or deferred in a manner that will meet the requirements of Code Section 409A, such that the grant, payment, settlement or deferral will not be subject to the additional tax or interest applicable under Code Section 409A.

14.Leaves of Absence/Transfer Between Locations. Unless the Administrator provides otherwise and except as required by Applicable Laws, vesting of Awards granted hereunder will be suspended during any unpaid leave of absence. A Service Provider will not cease to be an Employee in the case of (i) any leave of absence approved by the Company or (ii) transfers between locations of the Company or between the Company, its Parent, or any Subsidiary. For purposes of Incentive Stock Options, no such leave may exceed three (3) months, unless reemployment upon expiration of such leave is guaranteed by statute or contract. If reemployment upon expiration of a leave of absence approved by the Company is not so guaranteed, then six (6) months following the first (1st) day of such leave, any Incentive Stock Option held by the Participant will cease to be treated as an Incentive Stock Option and will be treated for tax purposes as a Nonstatutory Stock Option.

15.Transferability of Awards. Unless determined otherwise by the Administrator, an Award may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the Participant, only by the Participant. If the Administrator makes an Award transferable, such Award will contain such additional terms and conditions as the Administrator deems appropriate.

16.Termination of Relationship as a Service Provider due to Misconduct. If a Participant ceases to be a Service Provider due to his or her Misconduct or should a Participant engage in Misconduct while holding an outstanding Award, then all Awards that the Participant then holds will immediately terminate and the Participant will have no further rights with respect to such Awards. Upon such a termination, the Shares covered by the Awards that so terminate will revert to the Plan.

B-10


17.Minimum Vesting Requirements.
(a)General. Except as specified otherwise in Section 17(b), no Award will vest in full earlier than the 1-year anniversary of the Award’s date of grant, unless the vesting of the Award is accelerated pursuant to a Change in Control, certain terminations of a Participant’s status as a Service Provider on or after a Change in Control, a Participant’s death, or a Participant’s Disability (each, an “Acceleration Event”).
(b)Exception to Minimum Vesting Requirements. Awards that result in issuing up to 5% of the maximum aggregate number of Shares authorized for issuance under the Plan (the “5% Limit”) may be granted to any one or more Employees or Outside Directors without respect to the minimum vesting requirements set forth in Section 17(a). All Awards that have their vesting discretionarily accelerated (except if accelerated pursuant to an Acceleration Event) are subject to the 5% Limit. For purposes of clarification, the Administrator may accelerate the vesting of any Award pursuant to an Acceleration Event without such vesting acceleration counting toward the 5% Limit. The 5% Limit applies in the aggregate to Awards that do not satisfy the minimum vesting requirements set forth in Section 17(a) and to the discretionary vesting acceleration of Awards as specified in this Section 17(b).

18.Adjustments; Dissolution or Liquidation; Merger or Change in Control.
(a)Adjustments. In the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares, other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of Shares or other securities of the Company, or other change in the corporate structure of the Company affecting the Shares occurs, the Administrator, in order to prevent diminution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, will adjust the number and class of Shares that may be delivered under the Plan and/or the number, class, and price of Shares covered by each outstanding Award, and the numerical Share and unit limits set forth in Sections 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.
(b)Dissolution or Liquidation. In the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Administrator will notify each Participant as soon as practicable prior to the effective date of such proposed transaction. To the extent it has not been previously exercised, an Award will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed action.
(c)Change in Control. In the event of a merger of the Company with or into another corporation or other entity, or Change in Control, each outstanding Award will be treated as the Administrator determines, including, without limitation, that each Award be assumed or an equivalent option or right substituted by the successor corporation or a Parent or Subsidiary of the successor corporation. The Administrator will not be required to treat all Awards similarly in the transaction.
In the event that the successor corporation does not assume or substitute for the Award (or portion thereof), (and for the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding the vesting limitations under Section 17) the Participant will fully vest in and have the right to exercise all of his or her outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights that are not assumed or substituted for, including Shares as to which such Awards would not otherwise be vested or exercisable, all restrictions on Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, and Performance Shares/Units not assumed or substituted for will lapse, and, with respect to Awards with performance-based vesting not assumed or substituted for, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at one hundred percent (100%) of target levels (unless specifically provided otherwise under the applicable Award Agreement or other written agreement between the Participant and the Company) and all other terms and conditions met. In addition, if an Option or Stock Appreciation Right is not assumed or substituted for in the event of a Change in Control, the Administrator will notify the Participant in writing or electronically that the Option or Stock Appreciation Right will be fully vested and exercisable for a period of time determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion, and the Option or Stock Appreciation Right will terminate upon the expiration of such period.
With respect to Awards granted to Outside Directors that are assumed or substituted for, if on the date of or following such assumption or substitution the Participant’s status as a Director or a director of the successor corporation, as applicable, is terminated other than upon a voluntary resignation by the Participant, then the Participant will fully vest in and have the right to exercise Options and/or Stock Appreciation Rights as to all of the Shares subject thereto, including Shares as to which such Awards would not otherwise be vested or exercisable, all restrictions on Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares and Performance Units will lapse, and, with respect to Awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at one hundred percent (100%) of target levels and all other terms and conditions met.
For the purposes of this subsection (c), an Award will be considered assumed if, following the Change in Control, the Award confers the right to purchase or receive, for each Share subject to the Award immediately prior to the Change in Control, the consideration (whether stock, cash, or other securities or property) or, in the case of a Stock Appreciation Right upon the exercise of which the Administrator determines to pay cash or a Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Share or Performance Unit which the Administrator can determine to pay in cash, the fair market value of the consideration received in the merger or Change in Control by holders of Common Stock for each Share held on the effective date of the transaction (and if holders were offered

B-11


a choice of consideration, the type of consideration chosen by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares); provided, however, that if such consideration received in the Change in Control is not solely common stock of the successor corporation or its Parent, the Administrator may, with the consent of the successor corporation, provide for the consideration to be received upon the exercise of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right or upon the payout of a Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Share or Performance Unit, for each Share subject to such Award (or in the case of an Award settled in cash, the number of implied shares determined by dividing the value of the Award by the per share consideration received by holders of Common Stock in the Change in Control), to be solely common stock of the successor corporation or its Parent equal in fair market value to the per share consideration received by holders of Common Stock in the Change in Control.
Notwithstanding anything in this Section 18(c) to the contrary, an Award that vests, is earned or paid-out upon the satisfaction of one or more performance objectives (including any Performance Goals) will not be considered assumed if the Company or its successor modifies any of such performance objectives without the Participant’s consent; provided, however, a modification to such performance objectives only to reflect the successor corporation’s post-Change in Control corporate structure will not be deemed to invalidate an otherwise valid Award assumption.
Notwithstanding anything in this Section 18(c) to the contrary, if a payment under an Award Agreement is subject to Section 409A of the Code and if the change in control definition contained in the Award Agreement or other agreement related to the Award does not comply with the definition of “change in control” for purposes of a distribution under Section 409A of the Code, then any payment of an amount that is otherwise accelerated under this Section will be delayed until the earliest time that such payment would be permissible under Section 409A of the Code without triggering any penalties applicable under Section 409A of the Code.

19.Tax Withholding
(a)Withholding Requirements. Prior to the delivery of any Shares or cash pursuant to an Award (or exercise thereof) or such earlier time as any tax withholdings are due, the Company will have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, local, foreign or other taxes (including the Participant’s FICA obligation) required to be withheld with respect to such Award (or exercise thereof).
(b)Withholding Arrangements. The Administrator, in its sole discretion and pursuant to such procedures as it may specify from time to time, may permit a Participant to satisfy such tax withholding obligation, in whole or in part by (without limitation) (i) paying cash, (ii) electing to have the Company withhold otherwise deliverable cash or Shares having a fair market value equal to the minimum statutory amount required to be withheld, (iii) delivering to the Company already-owned Shares having a fair market value equal to the minimum statutory amount required to be withheld, provided the delivery of such Shares will not result in any adverse accounting consequences as the Administrator determines in its sole discretion, (iv) selling a sufficient number of Shares otherwise deliverable to the Participant through such means as the Administrator may determine in its sole discretion (whether through a broker or otherwise) equal to the amount required to be withheld or (v) retaining from salary or other amounts payable to the Participant cash having a sufficient value to satisfy the amount required to be withheld. The amount of the withholding requirement will be deemed to include any amount which the Administrator agrees may be withheld at the time the election is made, not to exceed the amount determined by using the maximum federal, state or local marginal income tax rates applicable to the Participant with respect to the Award on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined. The fair market value of the Shares to be withheld or delivered will be determined as of the date that the taxes are required to be withheld.

20.No Effect on Employment or Service. Neither the Plan nor any Award will confer upon a Participant any right with respect to continuing the Participant’s relationship as a Service Provider, nor will they interfere in any way with the Participant’s right or the right of the Company, or Parent or Subsidiary, as applicable, to terminate such relationship at any time, with or without cause, to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws.

21.Date of Grant. The date of grant of an Award will be, for all purposes, the date on which the Administrator makes the determination granting such Award, or such other later date as is determined by the Administrator. Notice of the determination will be provided to each Participant within a reasonable time after the date of such grant.

22.Term of Plan. Subject to Section 26of the Plan, this Plan as adopted by the Board in its amended and restated form will become effective as of the date of the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and will continue in effect for a term ending on the ten (10) year anniversary of such meeting, unless terminated earlier under Section 23of the Plan.

23.Amendment and Termination of the Plan.
(a)Amendment and Termination. The Administrator may at any time amend, alter, suspend or terminate the Plan.
(b)Stockholder Approval. The Company will obtain stockholder approval of any Plan amendment to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with Applicable Laws. Without limiting the foregoing sentence, the number of Shares

B-12


available under the Plan pursuant to Section 3 herein may not be increased without approval of the Company’s stockholders, except as provided in Section 3.
(c)Effect of Amendment or Termination. No amendment, alteration, suspension or termination of the Plan will impair the rights of any Participant, unless mutually agreed otherwise between the Participant and the Administrator, which agreement must be in writing and signed by the Participant and the Company. Termination of the Plan will not affect the Administrator’s ability to exercise the powers granted to it hereunder with respect to Awards granted under the Plan prior to the date of such termination.

24.Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares.
(a)Legal Compliance. Shares will not be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Award unless the exercise of such Award and the issuance and delivery of such Shares will comply with Applicable Laws and will be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance.
(b)Investment Representations. As a condition to the exercise of an Award, the Company may require the person exercising such Award to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the Shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such a representation is required.

25.Inability to Obtain Authority. The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction or to complete or comply with the requirements of any registration or other qualification of the Shares under any state, federal or foreign law or under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the stock exchange on which Shares of the same class are then listed, or any other governmental or regulatory body, which authority, registration, qualification or rule compliance is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to or advisable for the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, will relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority, registration, qualification or rule compliance will not have been obtained.

26.Stockholder Approval. The Plan will be subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company within twelve (12) months after the date the Plan is adopted. Such stockholder approval will be obtained in the manner and to the degree required under Applicable Laws.

27.Forfeiture Events. The Administrator may specify in an Award Agreement that the Participant’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an Award will be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award. Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary under this Plan, an Award shall be subject to the Company’s clawback policy as may be established and/or amended from time to time (the “Clawback Policy”). The Administrator may require a Participant to forfeit, return or reimburse the Company all or a portion of the Award and any amounts paid thereunder pursuant to the terms of the Clawback Policy or as necessary or appropriate to comply with Applicable Laws.



B-13



B-14



B-15